• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Facing a Clever Predator Demands Clever Responses - Red-Backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) vs. Eurasian Magpies (Pica pica)

M. Syrová, M. Němec, P. Veselý, E. Landová, R. Fuchs,

. 2016 ; 11 (7) : e0159432. [pub] 20160725

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc17031562

Red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) behave quite differently towards two common nest predators. While the European jay (Garrulus glandarius) is commonly attacked, in the presence of the Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), shrikes stay fully passive. We tested the hypotheses that this passive response to the magpie is an alternative defense strategy. Nesting shrikes were exposed to the commonly attacked European kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in a situation in which i) a harmless domestic pigeon, ii) a commonly attacked European jay, and iii) a non-attacked black-billed magpie are (separately) presented nearby. The kestrel dummy presented together with the magpie dummy was attacked with a significantly lower intensity than when it was presented with the other intruders (pigeon, jay) or alone. This means that the presence of the magpie inhibited the shrike's defense response towards the other intruder. These results support our previous hypotheses that shrikes use an alternative defense strategy in the magpie's presence. We hypothesize that the magpie is able to associate the active defense of the shrikes with the close proximity of a nest and that shrikes try not to draw the magpie's attention to the nest. The reason why this strategy is not used against the jay remains unanswered as jays as well as magpies show very similar cognitive and foraging skills enabling them to individuate the nest presence according to active parental defense.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031562
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171025123040.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0159432 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27454122
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Syrová, Michaela $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, České Budějovice, 37005, Czech Republic. Department of Ethology, Institute of Animal Science in Prague, Přátelství 815, Prague - Uhříněves, 10400, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Facing a Clever Predator Demands Clever Responses - Red-Backed Shrikes (Lanius collurio) vs. Eurasian Magpies (Pica pica) / $c M. Syrová, M. Němec, P. Veselý, E. Landová, R. Fuchs,
520    9_
$a Red-backed shrikes (Lanius collurio) behave quite differently towards two common nest predators. While the European jay (Garrulus glandarius) is commonly attacked, in the presence of the Eurasian magpie (Pica pica), shrikes stay fully passive. We tested the hypotheses that this passive response to the magpie is an alternative defense strategy. Nesting shrikes were exposed to the commonly attacked European kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) in a situation in which i) a harmless domestic pigeon, ii) a commonly attacked European jay, and iii) a non-attacked black-billed magpie are (separately) presented nearby. The kestrel dummy presented together with the magpie dummy was attacked with a significantly lower intensity than when it was presented with the other intruders (pigeon, jay) or alone. This means that the presence of the magpie inhibited the shrike's defense response towards the other intruder. These results support our previous hypotheses that shrikes use an alternative defense strategy in the magpie's presence. We hypothesize that the magpie is able to associate the active defense of the shrikes with the close proximity of a nest and that shrikes try not to draw the magpie's attention to the nest. The reason why this strategy is not used against the jay remains unanswered as jays as well as magpies show very similar cognitive and foraging skills enabling them to individuate the nest presence according to active parental defense.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a ptáci $7 D001717
650    12
$a hnízdění $7 D009425
650    12
$a predátorské chování $7 D011235
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Němec, Michal $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, České Budějovice, 37005, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Veselý, Petr $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, České Budějovice, 37005, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Landová, Eva $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 1594/7, Praha - Nové Město, 12800, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fuchs, Roman $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, České Budějovice, 37005, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 11, č. 7 (2016), s. e0159432
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27454122 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171025123122 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1255155 $s 992589
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 11 $c 7 $d e0159432 $e 20160725 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace