-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Missed bleeding events after ticagrelor in PEGASUS trial: Massive non-compliance, information censoring, or both
V. Serebruany, A. Tomek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu úvodníky
- MeSH
- adenosin aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky analogy a deriváty MeSH
- cenzura ve výzkumu MeSH
- infarkt myokardu farmakoterapie MeSH
- krvácení chemicky indukované MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma MeSH
- rozvrh dávkování léků MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- úvodníky MeSH
PEGASUS trial reported reduction of composite primary endpoint after conventional 180mg/daily ticagrelor (CT), and lower 120mg/daily dose ticagrelor (LT) at expense of extra bleeding. Following approval of CT and LT for long-term secondary prevention indication, recent FDA review verified some bleeding outcomes in PEGASUS. To compare the risks after CT and LT against placebo by seven TIMI scale variables, and 9 bleeding categories considered as serious adverse events (SAE) in light of PEGASUS drug discontinuation rates (DDR). The DDR in all PEGASUS arms was high reaching astronomical 32% for CT. The distribution of some outcomes (TIMI major, trauma, epistaxis, iron deficiency, hemoptysis, and anemia) was reasonable. However, the TIMI minor events were heavily underreported when compared to similar trials. Other bleedings (intracranial, spontaneous, hematuria, and gastrointestinal) appear sporadic, lacking expected dose-dependent impact of CT and LT. Few SAE outcomes (fatal, ecchymosis, hematoma, bruises, bleeding) paradoxically reported more bleeding after LT than after CT. Many bleeding outcomes were probably missed in PEGASUS potentially due to massive non-compliance, information censoring, or both. The FDA must improve reporting of trial outcomes especially in the sponsor-controlled environment when DDR and incomplete follow-up rates are high.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17031768
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20171025123918.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 171025s2016 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.114 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27128533
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Serebruany, Victor $u Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: vserebr1@jhmi.edu.
- 245 10
- $a Missed bleeding events after ticagrelor in PEGASUS trial: Massive non-compliance, information censoring, or both / $c V. Serebruany, A. Tomek,
- 520 9_
- $a PEGASUS trial reported reduction of composite primary endpoint after conventional 180mg/daily ticagrelor (CT), and lower 120mg/daily dose ticagrelor (LT) at expense of extra bleeding. Following approval of CT and LT for long-term secondary prevention indication, recent FDA review verified some bleeding outcomes in PEGASUS. To compare the risks after CT and LT against placebo by seven TIMI scale variables, and 9 bleeding categories considered as serious adverse events (SAE) in light of PEGASUS drug discontinuation rates (DDR). The DDR in all PEGASUS arms was high reaching astronomical 32% for CT. The distribution of some outcomes (TIMI major, trauma, epistaxis, iron deficiency, hemoptysis, and anemia) was reasonable. However, the TIMI minor events were heavily underreported when compared to similar trials. Other bleedings (intracranial, spontaneous, hematuria, and gastrointestinal) appear sporadic, lacking expected dose-dependent impact of CT and LT. Few SAE outcomes (fatal, ecchymosis, hematoma, bruises, bleeding) paradoxically reported more bleeding after LT than after CT. Many bleeding outcomes were probably missed in PEGASUS potentially due to massive non-compliance, information censoring, or both. The FDA must improve reporting of trial outcomes especially in the sponsor-controlled environment when DDR and incomplete follow-up rates are high.
- 650 _2
- $a adenosin $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $x analogy a deriváty $7 D000241
- 650 _2
- $a cenzura ve výzkumu $7 D000068597
- 650 _2
- $a rozvrh dávkování léků $7 D004334
- 650 _2
- $a krvácení $x chemicky indukované $7 D006470
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a infarkt myokardu $x farmakoterapie $7 D009203
- 650 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie jako téma $7 D016032
- 655 _2
- $a úvodníky $7 D016421
- 700 1_
- $a Tomek, Ales $u Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002299 $t International journal of cardiology $x 1874-1754 $g Roč. 215, č. - (2016), s. 214-6
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27128533 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20171025 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20171025124000 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1255361 $s 992795
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 215 $c - $d 214-6 $e 20160415 $i 1874-1754 $m International journal of cardiology $n Int J Cardiol $x MED00002299
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20171025