• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Thalamic Iron Differentiates Primary-Progressive and Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

A. Burgetova, P. Dusek, M. Vaneckova, D. Horakova, C. Langkammer, J. Krasensky, L. Sobisek, P. Matras, M. Masek, Z. Seidl,

. 2017 ; 38 (6) : 1079-1086. [pub] 20170427

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18010625

Grantová podpora
NV15-25602A MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Potential differences between primary progressive and relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis are the subject of ongoing controversial discussions. The aim of this work was to determine whether and how primary-progressive and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis subtypes differ regarding conventional MR imaging parameters, cerebral iron deposits, and their association with clinical status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 24 patients with primary-progressive MS, 80 with relapsing-remitting MS, and 20 healthy controls with 1.5T MR imaging for assessment of the conventional quantitative parameters: T2 lesion load, T1 lesion load, brain parenchymal fraction, and corpus callosum volume. Quantitative susceptibility mapping was performed to estimate iron concentration in the deep gray matter. RESULTS: Decreased susceptibility within the thalamus in relapsing-remitting MS compared with primary-progressive MS was the only significant MR imaging difference between these MS subtypes. In the relapsing-remitting MS subgroup, the Expanded Disability Status Scale score was positively associated with conventional parameters reflecting white matter lesions and brain atrophy and with iron in the putamen and caudate nucleus. A positive association with putaminal iron and the Expanded Disability Status Scale score was found in primary-progressive MS. CONCLUSIONS: Susceptibility in the thalamus might provide additional support for the differentiation between primary-progressive and relapsing-remitting MS. That the Expanded Disability Status Scale score was associated with conventional MR imaging parameters and iron concentrations in several deep gray matter regions in relapsing-remitting MS, while only a weak association with putaminal iron was observed in primary-progressive MS suggests different driving forces of disability in these MS subtypes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010625
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180426095809.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3174/ajnr.A5166 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28450431
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Burgetova, A $u From the Departments of Radiology (A.B., M.V., J.K., P.M., M.M., Z.S.) andrea.burgetova@vfn.cz.
245    10
$a Thalamic Iron Differentiates Primary-Progressive and Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis / $c A. Burgetova, P. Dusek, M. Vaneckova, D. Horakova, C. Langkammer, J. Krasensky, L. Sobisek, P. Matras, M. Masek, Z. Seidl,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Potential differences between primary progressive and relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis are the subject of ongoing controversial discussions. The aim of this work was to determine whether and how primary-progressive and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis subtypes differ regarding conventional MR imaging parameters, cerebral iron deposits, and their association with clinical status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 24 patients with primary-progressive MS, 80 with relapsing-remitting MS, and 20 healthy controls with 1.5T MR imaging for assessment of the conventional quantitative parameters: T2 lesion load, T1 lesion load, brain parenchymal fraction, and corpus callosum volume. Quantitative susceptibility mapping was performed to estimate iron concentration in the deep gray matter. RESULTS: Decreased susceptibility within the thalamus in relapsing-remitting MS compared with primary-progressive MS was the only significant MR imaging difference between these MS subtypes. In the relapsing-remitting MS subgroup, the Expanded Disability Status Scale score was positively associated with conventional parameters reflecting white matter lesions and brain atrophy and with iron in the putamen and caudate nucleus. A positive association with putaminal iron and the Expanded Disability Status Scale score was found in primary-progressive MS. CONCLUSIONS: Susceptibility in the thalamus might provide additional support for the differentiation between primary-progressive and relapsing-remitting MS. That the Expanded Disability Status Scale score was associated with conventional MR imaging parameters and iron concentrations in several deep gray matter regions in relapsing-remitting MS, while only a weak association with putaminal iron was observed in primary-progressive MS suggests different driving forces of disability in these MS subtypes.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a železo $x analýza $7 D007501
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a chronicko-progresivní roztroušená skleróza $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D020528
650    _2
$a relabující-remitující roztroušená skleróza $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D020529
650    _2
$a thalamus $x chemie $x patologie $7 D013788
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dusek, P $u Neurology (P.D., D.H.), Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. Institute of Neuroradiology (P.D.), University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Vaneckova, M $u From the Departments of Radiology (A.B., M.V., J.K., P.M., M.M., Z.S.).
700    1_
$a Horakova, D $u Neurology (P.D., D.H.), Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Langkammer, C $u Department of Neurology (C.L.), Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
700    1_
$a Krasensky, J $u From the Departments of Radiology (A.B., M.V., J.K., P.M., M.M., Z.S.).
700    1_
$a Sobisek, L $u Department of Statistics and Probability (L.S.), University of Economics, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Matras, P $u From the Departments of Radiology (A.B., M.V., J.K., P.M., M.M., Z.S.).
700    1_
$a Masek, M $u From the Departments of Radiology (A.B., M.V., J.K., P.M., M.M., Z.S.).
700    1_
$a Seidl, Z $u From the Departments of Radiology (A.B., M.V., J.K., P.M., M.M., Z.S.).
773    0_
$w MED00009116 $t AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology $x 1936-959X $g Roč. 38, č. 6 (2017), s. 1079-1086
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28450431 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180426095920 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288110 $s 1007437
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 38 $c 6 $d 1079-1086 $e 20170427 $i 1936-959X $m American journal of neuroradiology $n AJNR Am J Neuroradiol $x MED00009116
GRA    __
$a NV15-25602A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace