• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Robotic and Advanced Laparoscopic Surgical Training in European Gynecological Oncology Trainees

C. Gan, M. Bossart, J. Piek, M. Halaska, D. Haidopoulos, I. Zapardiel, JP. Grabowski, V. Kesic, R. Kimmig, D. Cibula, E. Lambaudie, R. Verheijen, R. Manchanda,

. 2017 ; 27 (2) : 375-381.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18010841
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2001-01-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2001-01-01 do Před 6 měsíci

INTRODUCTION: Advanced minimal access surgical training is an important component of training in gynecological oncology (GO). Europe-wide data on this topic are lacking. We present data on availability and trainee experience of advanced laparoscopic surgical (ALS) and robotic surgical (RS) training in GO across Europe. METHOD: A prospective web-based anonymized survey of European GO trainees was sent to the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists members/trainees. It included sociodemographic information and specific questions pertaining to training experience or satisfaction in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. χ2 test was used for evaluating categorical variables and Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis (nonparametric) tests for continuous variables between 2 and more independent groups. RESULTS: A total of 113 GO trainees from 29 countries responded. The mean (standard deviation) age was 35.2 (6.1) years, 59.3% were men, 40.7% were women, and 46% were in accredited training posts. The ALS and RS training was offered in only 43% and 23% of institutes respectively, and 54% and 23% of trainees had undergone some form of formal or informal training in ALS and RS respectively. A total of 62.4% felt that RS should be a formal component of GO training programs. A total of 61% and 35% planned to go outside their institute for ALS or RS training respectively. Trainees rating (1-5 scale) of their open surgery and ALS or RS skills (3.3/2.6/1.9) and training experience (3.5/2.8/2.1), respectively, were higher for open surgery than ALS or RS (P < 0.0005). Accredited posts were more likely than nonaccredited posts to offer ALS training (60%/31%, P = 0.002), formal training schedules (27.9%/4.4%, P = 0.003), and use of logbooks (46%/23%, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Training and experience in ALS and RS are poorly rated by GO trainees across Europe, and only few centers offer this. There is an urgent need to expand and harmonize training opportunities for ALS and RS. Most trainees want RS included as a formal component of their training.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010841
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200513231253.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000879 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28114237
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Gan, Carmen $u 1 Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, United Kingdom. 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 3 Comprehensive Cancer Center South Location Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 4 2nd Medical Faculty of the Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 5 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece. 6 Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. 7 Department of Gynecology, European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer, Charite-University Medicine of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 8 Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia. 9 Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany. 10 Oncogynecological Centre, Charles University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. 11 Paoli Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France. 12 Division of Surgical and Oncological Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 13 Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London; and. 14 Department of Women's Cancer, EGA Institute of Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
245    10
$a Robotic and Advanced Laparoscopic Surgical Training in European Gynecological Oncology Trainees / $c C. Gan, M. Bossart, J. Piek, M. Halaska, D. Haidopoulos, I. Zapardiel, JP. Grabowski, V. Kesic, R. Kimmig, D. Cibula, E. Lambaudie, R. Verheijen, R. Manchanda,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Advanced minimal access surgical training is an important component of training in gynecological oncology (GO). Europe-wide data on this topic are lacking. We present data on availability and trainee experience of advanced laparoscopic surgical (ALS) and robotic surgical (RS) training in GO across Europe. METHOD: A prospective web-based anonymized survey of European GO trainees was sent to the European Network of Young Gynaecological Oncologists members/trainees. It included sociodemographic information and specific questions pertaining to training experience or satisfaction in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. χ2 test was used for evaluating categorical variables and Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis (nonparametric) tests for continuous variables between 2 and more independent groups. RESULTS: A total of 113 GO trainees from 29 countries responded. The mean (standard deviation) age was 35.2 (6.1) years, 59.3% were men, 40.7% were women, and 46% were in accredited training posts. The ALS and RS training was offered in only 43% and 23% of institutes respectively, and 54% and 23% of trainees had undergone some form of formal or informal training in ALS and RS respectively. A total of 62.4% felt that RS should be a formal component of GO training programs. A total of 61% and 35% planned to go outside their institute for ALS or RS training respectively. Trainees rating (1-5 scale) of their open surgery and ALS or RS skills (3.3/2.6/1.9) and training experience (3.5/2.8/2.1), respectively, were higher for open surgery than ALS or RS (P < 0.0005). Accredited posts were more likely than nonaccredited posts to offer ALS training (60%/31%, P = 0.002), formal training schedules (27.9%/4.4%, P = 0.003), and use of logbooks (46%/23%, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Training and experience in ALS and RS are poorly rated by GO trainees across Europe, and only few centers offer this. There is an urgent need to expand and harmonize training opportunities for ALS and RS. Most trainees want RS included as a formal component of their training.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a gynekologické chirurgické výkony $x výchova $7 D013509
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a laparoskopie $x výchova $7 D010535
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a roboticky asistované výkony $x výchova $7 D065287
650    _2
$a chirurgická onkologie $x výchova $7 D000071077
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Bossart, Michaela
700    1_
$a Piek, Jurgen
700    1_
$a Halaska, Michael
700    1_
$a Haidopoulos, Dimitrios
700    1_
$a Zapardiel, Ignacio
700    1_
$a Grabowski, Jacek P
700    1_
$a Kesic, Vesna
700    1_
$a Kimmig, Rainer
700    1_
$a Cibula, David
700    1_
$a Lambaudie, Eric
700    1_
$a Verheijen, Rene
700    1_
$a Manchanda, Ranjit
773    0_
$w MED00009896 $t International journal of gynecological cancer official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society $x 1525-1438 $g Roč. 27, č. 2 (2017), s. 375-381
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28114237 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200513231304 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288326 $s 1007653
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 27 $c 2 $d 375-381 $i 1525-1438 $m International journal of gynecological cancer $n Int J Gynecol Cancer $x MED00009896
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...