Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Pathoanatomy and computed tomography classification of glenoid fossa fractures based on ninety patients

J. Bartoníček, M. Tuček, D. Klika, A. Chochola,

. 2016 ; 40 (11) : 2383-2392. [pub] 20160330

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NT14092 MZ0 CEP Register

PURPOSE: The aim of the article is to present the pathoanatomy and a new classification of glenoid fractures developed on the basis of analysis of 3D computed tomography (CT) examinations and intra-operative findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 90 patients (69 men and 21 women) who sustained glenoid fractures. Mean patient age was 47 years (17-92). In 77 nonpolytraumatised patients, anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the affected shoulder girdle were taken, including Neer I and II views. All 90 patients underwent CT examination, combined in 73 of them with 3D CT reconstruction including subtraction of the humeral head, ribs and clavicle, from the anterior and posterolateral views. In total, 52 patients (58 %) were operated on and 38 42 %) were treated non-operatively. RESULTS: In total, five basic types of injuries to the glenoid were identified based on analysis of the separated portion of the glenoid fossa: including fractures of the superior glenoid (14 cases, 16 %), the anterior glenoid (23 cases, 23 %), the posterior rim of the glenoid (5 cases, 6 %), the inferior glenoid (38 cases, 42 %) and the entire glenoid (10 cases, 11 %). CONCLUSION: The proposed classification of glenoid fractures defines five basic types of fractures verified by 3D CT reconstructions and intra-operative findings. It respects the anatomical architecture of scapula, fracture mechanism, associated injuries to the shoulder girdle and, where appropriate, the preferred surgical approach.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010970
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190704093908.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2016 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00264-016-3169-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27026622
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Bartoníček, Jan, $u Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Central Military Hospital, Charles University Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Prague 6, Czech Republic. bartonicek.jan@seznam.cz. $d 1955- $7 nlk19990073000
245    10
$a Pathoanatomy and computed tomography classification of glenoid fossa fractures based on ninety patients / $c J. Bartoníček, M. Tuček, D. Klika, A. Chochola,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The aim of the article is to present the pathoanatomy and a new classification of glenoid fractures developed on the basis of analysis of 3D computed tomography (CT) examinations and intra-operative findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group comprised 90 patients (69 men and 21 women) who sustained glenoid fractures. Mean patient age was 47 years (17-92). In 77 nonpolytraumatised patients, anteroposterior (AP) radiographs of the affected shoulder girdle were taken, including Neer I and II views. All 90 patients underwent CT examination, combined in 73 of them with 3D CT reconstruction including subtraction of the humeral head, ribs and clavicle, from the anterior and posterolateral views. In total, 52 patients (58 %) were operated on and 38 42 %) were treated non-operatively. RESULTS: In total, five basic types of injuries to the glenoid were identified based on analysis of the separated portion of the glenoid fossa: including fractures of the superior glenoid (14 cases, 16 %), the anterior glenoid (23 cases, 23 %), the posterior rim of the glenoid (5 cases, 6 %), the inferior glenoid (38 cases, 42 %) and the entire glenoid (10 cases, 11 %). CONCLUSION: The proposed classification of glenoid fractures defines five basic types of fractures verified by 3D CT reconstructions and intra-operative findings. It respects the anatomical architecture of scapula, fracture mechanism, associated injuries to the shoulder girdle and, where appropriate, the preferred surgical approach.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a fraktury kostí $x klasifikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D050723
650    _2
$a kloubní jamka lopatky $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D061165
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a zobrazování trojrozměrné $7 D021621
650    _2
$a peroperační doba $7 D007432
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a fyzikální vyšetření $7 D010808
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a ramenní kloub $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patologie $7 D012785
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
650    _2
$a poranění ramene $7 D000070599
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Tuček, Michal $u Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Central Military Hospital, Charles University Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Prague 6, Czech Republic. $7 xx0099649
700    1_
$a Klika, Daniel $u Department of Radiology, Central Military Hospital, U Vojenskénemocnice 1200, 169 02, Prague 6, Czech Republic. $7 xx0237751
700    1_
$a Chochola, Antonín $u Department of Orthopaedics, First Faculty of Medicine, Central Military Hospital, Charles University Prague, U Vojenské nemocnice 1200, 169 02, Prague 6, Czech Republic. $7 xx0117811
773    0_
$w MED00002384 $t International orthopaedics $x 1432-5195 $g Roč. 40, č. 11 (2016), s. 2383-2392
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27026622 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190704094059 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288455 $s 1007782
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 40 $c 11 $d 2383-2392 $e 20160330 $i 1432-5195 $m International orthopaedics $n Int Orthop $x MED00002384
GRA    __
$a NT14092 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...