-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
BATON-CRC: A Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing Tivozanib Plus mFOLFOX6 with Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6 in Stage IV Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
AB. Benson, I. Kiss, J. Bridgewater, FA. Eskens, C. Sasse, S. Vossen, J. Chen, C. Van Sant, HA. Ball, A. Keating, A. Krivoshik,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze II, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 1995
Open Access Digital Library
od 1995-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 1995-01-01
- MeSH
- bevacizumab škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- chinoliny škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- fenylmočovinové sloučeniny škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- fluoruracil škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- inhibitory angiogeneze terapeutické užití MeSH
- kolorektální nádory farmakoterapie patologie MeSH
- leukovorin škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery krev MeSH
- neuropilin-1 krev MeSH
- organoplatinové sloučeniny škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- přežití bez známek nemoci MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky terapeutické užití MeSH
- receptory vaskulárního endoteliálního růstového faktoru antagonisté a inhibitory MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze II MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
PURPOSE: Tivozanib, a selective inhibitor of VEGFR-1, -2, and -3, plus mFOLFOX6 in an advanced gastrointestinal cancer phase Ib study had encouraging antineoplastic activity and a tolerable safety profile. This randomized, open-label, phase II trial of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) evaluated tivozanib activity versus bevacizumab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Treatment-naïve patients received mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks of each 28-day cycle plus either tivozanib orally 1.5 mg once daily for 21 days or bevacizumab intravenously 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint; some secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, time to treatment failure, and biomarker subgroup analyses. RESULTS: A prespecified interim futility analysis demonstrated that the futility boundary for superiority of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 over bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 for PFS in the intent-to-treat population was crossed; median PFS was 9.4 versus 10.7 months [HR = 1.091; confidence interval (CI), 0.693-1.718; P = 0.706]. Tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 resulted in PFS and ORR comparable with bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6; interim analyses biomarker results revealed no significant PFS association. Post hoc final analyses demonstrated a potential difference in tivozanib-specific PFS in patients with low neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), but not in patients with high NRP-1. Tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 was tolerable and adverse events were comparable with both bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 and previous tivozanib studies. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 was comparable with but not superior to bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated mCRC. Since data from the prespecified interim analysis did not demonstrate superiority, this resulted in discontinuation of the study. The safety and tolerability profile of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 was consistent with other tivozanib trials. NRP-1 is a potential predictive biomarker for tivozanib activity, but these results require further validation. Clin Cancer Res; 22(20); 5058-67. ©2016 AACR.
Astellas Pharma Global Development Northbrook Illinois
Eramus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam the Netherlands
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic
Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University Chicago Illinois
University College London Cancer Institute London United Kingdom
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18011122
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180416095413.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3117 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27401244
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Benson, Al B $u Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. a-benson@northwestern.edu.
- 245 10
- $a BATON-CRC: A Phase II Randomized Trial Comparing Tivozanib Plus mFOLFOX6 with Bevacizumab Plus mFOLFOX6 in Stage IV Metastatic Colorectal Cancer / $c AB. Benson, I. Kiss, J. Bridgewater, FA. Eskens, C. Sasse, S. Vossen, J. Chen, C. Van Sant, HA. Ball, A. Keating, A. Krivoshik,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Tivozanib, a selective inhibitor of VEGFR-1, -2, and -3, plus mFOLFOX6 in an advanced gastrointestinal cancer phase Ib study had encouraging antineoplastic activity and a tolerable safety profile. This randomized, open-label, phase II trial of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) evaluated tivozanib activity versus bevacizumab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Treatment-naïve patients received mFOLFOX6 every 2 weeks of each 28-day cycle plus either tivozanib orally 1.5 mg once daily for 21 days or bevacizumab intravenously 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint; some secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, time to treatment failure, and biomarker subgroup analyses. RESULTS: A prespecified interim futility analysis demonstrated that the futility boundary for superiority of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 over bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 for PFS in the intent-to-treat population was crossed; median PFS was 9.4 versus 10.7 months [HR = 1.091; confidence interval (CI), 0.693-1.718; P = 0.706]. Tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 resulted in PFS and ORR comparable with bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6; interim analyses biomarker results revealed no significant PFS association. Post hoc final analyses demonstrated a potential difference in tivozanib-specific PFS in patients with low neuropilin-1 (NRP-1), but not in patients with high NRP-1. Tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 was tolerable and adverse events were comparable with both bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 and previous tivozanib studies. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 was comparable with but not superior to bevacizumab/mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated mCRC. Since data from the prespecified interim analysis did not demonstrate superiority, this resulted in discontinuation of the study. The safety and tolerability profile of tivozanib/mFOLFOX6 was consistent with other tivozanib trials. NRP-1 is a potential predictive biomarker for tivozanib activity, but these results require further validation. Clin Cancer Res; 22(20); 5058-67. ©2016 AACR.
- 650 _2
- $a inhibitory angiogeneze $x terapeutické užití $7 D020533
- 650 _2
- $a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
- 650 _2
- $a bevacizumab $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000068258
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x krev $7 D014408
- 650 _2
- $a kolorektální nádory $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D015179
- 650 _2
- $a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
- 650 _2
- $a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a fluoruracil $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D005472
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a leukovorin $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D002955
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neuropilin-1 $x krev $7 D039942
- 650 _2
- $a organoplatinové sloučeniny $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D009944
- 650 _2
- $a fenylmočovinové sloučeniny $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D010671
- 650 _2
- $a chinoliny $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D011804
- 650 _2
- $a receptory vaskulárního endoteliálního růstového faktoru $x antagonisté a inhibitory $7 D040262
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze II $7 D017427
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Kiss, Igor $u Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bridgewater, John $u University College London Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom.
- 700 1_
- $a Eskens, Ferry A L M $u Eramus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Sasse, Carolyn $u Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, Illinois.
- 700 1_
- $a Vossen, Sandra $u Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, Illinois.
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Jihong $u Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, Illinois.
- 700 1_
- $a Van Sant, Chip $u Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, Illinois.
- 700 1_
- $a Ball, Howard A $u Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, Illinois.
- 700 1_
- $a Keating, Anne $u Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, Illinois.
- 700 1_
- $a Krivoshik, Andrew $u Astellas Pharma Global Development, Northbrook, Illinois.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001121 $t Clinical cancer research an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research $x 1078-0432 $g Roč. 22, č. 20 (2016), s. 5058-5067
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27401244 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180416095510 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288607 $s 1007934
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 22 $c 20 $d 5058-5067 $e 20160711 $i 1078-0432 $m Clinical cancer research $n Clin Cancer Res $x MED00001121
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404