• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Applying the dark diversity concept to nature conservation

RJ. Lewis, F. de Bello, JA. Bennett, P. Fibich, GE. Finerty, L. Götzenberger, I. Hiiesalu, L. Kasari, J. Lepš, M. Májeková, O. Mudrák, K. Riibak, A. Ronk, T. Rychtecká, A. Vitová, M. Pärtel,

. 2017 ; 31 (1) : 40-47. [pub] 20160622

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18011273

Linking diversity to biological processes is central for developing informed and effective conservation decisions. Unfortunately, observable patterns provide only a proportion of the information necessary for fully understanding the mechanisms and processes acting on a particular population or community. We suggest conservation managers use the often overlooked information relative to species absences and pay particular attention to dark diversity (i.e., a set of species that are absent from a site but that could disperse to and establish there, in other words, the absent portion of a habitat-specific species pool). Together with existing ecological metrics, concepts, and conservation tools, dark diversity can be used to complement and further develop conservation prioritization and management decisions through an understanding of biodiversity relativized by its potential (i.e., its species pool). Furthermore, through a detailed understanding of the population, community, and functional dark diversity, the restoration potential of degraded habitats can be more rigorously assessed and so to the likelihood of successful species invasions. We suggest the application of the dark diversity concept is currently an underappreciated source of information that is valuable for conservation applications ranging from macroscale conservation prioritization to more locally scaled restoration ecology and the management of invasive species.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18011273
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180404142706.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/cobi.12723 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27027266
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Lewis, Rob J $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu, 51005, Estonia. Department of Bioscience - Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Ny Munkegade 116, DK, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
245    10
$a Applying the dark diversity concept to nature conservation / $c RJ. Lewis, F. de Bello, JA. Bennett, P. Fibich, GE. Finerty, L. Götzenberger, I. Hiiesalu, L. Kasari, J. Lepš, M. Májeková, O. Mudrák, K. Riibak, A. Ronk, T. Rychtecká, A. Vitová, M. Pärtel,
520    9_
$a Linking diversity to biological processes is central for developing informed and effective conservation decisions. Unfortunately, observable patterns provide only a proportion of the information necessary for fully understanding the mechanisms and processes acting on a particular population or community. We suggest conservation managers use the often overlooked information relative to species absences and pay particular attention to dark diversity (i.e., a set of species that are absent from a site but that could disperse to and establish there, in other words, the absent portion of a habitat-specific species pool). Together with existing ecological metrics, concepts, and conservation tools, dark diversity can be used to complement and further develop conservation prioritization and management decisions through an understanding of biodiversity relativized by its potential (i.e., its species pool). Furthermore, through a detailed understanding of the population, community, and functional dark diversity, the restoration potential of degraded habitats can be more rigorously assessed and so to the likelihood of successful species invasions. We suggest the application of the dark diversity concept is currently an underappreciated source of information that is valuable for conservation applications ranging from macroscale conservation prioritization to more locally scaled restoration ecology and the management of invasive species.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a biodiverzita $7 D044822
650    12
$a zachování přírodních zdrojů $7 D003247
650    _2
$a ekologie $7 D004463
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a zavlečené druhy $7 D058865
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a de Bello, Francesco $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia CZ-370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bennett, Jonathan A $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu, 51005, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Fibich, Pavel $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia CZ-370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Finerty, Genevieve E $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic. Department of Environmental Research, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, U.K.
700    1_
$a Götzenberger, Lars $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hiiesalu, Inga $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu, 51005, Estonia. Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kasari, Liis $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu, 51005, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Lepš, Jan $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia CZ-370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Májeková, Maria $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Natural Science, Comenius University SK-842 15, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
700    1_
$a Mudrák, Ondřej $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82, Třeboň, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Riibak, Kersti $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu, 51005, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Ronk, Argo $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu, 51005, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Rychtecká, Terezie $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia CZ-370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vitová, Alena $u Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia CZ-370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pärtel, Meelis $u Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu, 51005, Estonia.
773    0_
$w MED00001224 $t Conservation biology the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology $x 1523-1739 $g Roč. 31, č. 1 (2017), s. 40-47
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27027266 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180404142745 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288758 $s 1008085
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 31 $c 1 $d 40-47 $e 20160622 $i 1523-1739 $m Conservation biology $n Conserv. biol. $x MED00001224
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace