-
Something wrong with this record ?
The dilemma of dual renin-angiotensin system blockade in chronic kidney disease: why beneficial in animal experiments but not in the clinic
V. Čertíková Chábová, L. Červenka
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article, Review
Grant support
NV15-28671A
MZ0
CEP Register
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 1991
Free Medical Journals
from 1998
ProQuest Central
from 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2005-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2005-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1998
- MeSH
- Acute Kidney Injury chemically induced immunology prevention & control MeSH
- Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers administration & dosage MeSH
- Renal Insufficiency, Chronic drug therapy immunology MeSH
- Species Specificity MeSH
- Hyperkalemia chemically induced immunology prevention & control MeSH
- Hypertension chemically induced immunology prevention & control MeSH
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors administration & dosage adverse effects MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Evidence-Based Medicine MeSH
- Disease Models, Animal * MeSH
- Renin-Angiotensin System drug effects immunology MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) improved the prognosis in patients with hypertension, heart failure, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. However, combining different drugs brought no further benefit while increasing the risk of hyperkalemia, hypotension and acute renal failure. This was so with combining angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptors type 1 antagonists (ARB). Dissimilarly, in animal disease models this dual therapy proved clearly superior to single drug treatment and became the optimal standard regime for comparison with other treatments. This review analyzes the causes of the discrepancy of effects of the dual therapy between animal experiments versus clinical studies, and is focused on the outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Discussed is the role of species differences in RAAS, of the variability of the disease features in humans versus relative stability in animals, of the genetic uniformity in the animals but not in humans, and of the biased publication habits of experimental versus clinical studies. We attempt to understand the causes and reconcile the discordant findings and suggest to what extent dual RAAS inhibition should be continued in animal experiments and why its application in the clinics should be limited to strictly selected groups of patients.
Department of Nephrology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Pathophysiology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18011449
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180502083300.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180405s2017 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.33549/physiolres.933607 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28471687
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Čertíková-Chábová, Věra $u Department of Nephrology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0095872
- 245 14
- $a The dilemma of dual renin-angiotensin system blockade in chronic kidney disease: why beneficial in animal experiments but not in the clinic / $c V. Čertíková Chábová, L. Červenka
- 520 9_
- $a Drugs interfering with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) improved the prognosis in patients with hypertension, heart failure, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. However, combining different drugs brought no further benefit while increasing the risk of hyperkalemia, hypotension and acute renal failure. This was so with combining angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptors type 1 antagonists (ARB). Dissimilarly, in animal disease models this dual therapy proved clearly superior to single drug treatment and became the optimal standard regime for comparison with other treatments. This review analyzes the causes of the discrepancy of effects of the dual therapy between animal experiments versus clinical studies, and is focused on the outcomes in chronic kidney disease. Discussed is the role of species differences in RAAS, of the variability of the disease features in humans versus relative stability in animals, of the genetic uniformity in the animals but not in humans, and of the biased publication habits of experimental versus clinical studies. We attempt to understand the causes and reconcile the discordant findings and suggest to what extent dual RAAS inhibition should be continued in animal experiments and why its application in the clinics should be limited to strictly selected groups of patients.
- 650 _2
- $a akutní poškození ledvin $x chemicky indukované $x imunologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D058186
- 650 _2
- $a blokátory receptoru 1 pro angiotenzin II $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D047228
- 650 _2
- $a inhibitory ACE $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D000806
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
- 650 _2
- $a medicína založená na důkazech $7 D019317
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hyperkalemie $x chemicky indukované $x imunologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D006947
- 650 _2
- $a hypertenze $x chemicky indukované $x imunologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D006973
- 650 _2
- $a chronická renální insuficience $x farmakoterapie $x imunologie $7 D051436
- 650 _2
- $a renin-angiotensin systém $x účinky léků $x imunologie $7 D012084
- 650 _2
- $a druhová specificita $7 D013045
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Červenka, Luděk, $d 1967- $7 xx0037105 $u Center for Experimental Medicine, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Pathophysiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003824 $t Physiological research $x 1802-9973 $g Roč. 66, č. 2 (2017), s. 181-192
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28471687 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 4120 $c 266 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180425100702 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1296228 $s 1008261
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 66 $c 2 $d 181-192 $i 1802-9973 $m Physiological research $n Physiol. Res. (Print) $x MED00003824
- GRA __
- $a NV15-28671A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20180405