Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Influence of the Gut Microbiota Composition on Campylobacter jejuni Colonization in Chickens

Z. Han, T. Willer, L. Li, C. Pielsticker, I. Rychlik, P. Velge, B. Kaspers, S. Rautenschlein,

. 2017 ; 85 (11) : . [pub] 20171018

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18016426
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 1970 do Před 6 měsíci
Freely Accessible Science Journals od 1995 do Před 6 měsíci
PubMed Central od 1970 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central od 1970 do Před 6 měsíci
Open Access Digital Library od 1970-01-01
Open Access Digital Library od 1970-01-01

The Campylobacter jejuni-host interaction may be affected by the host's gut microbiota through competitive exclusion, metabolites, or modification of the immune response. To understand this interaction, C. jejuni colonization and local immune responses were compared in chickens with different gut microbiota compositions. Birds were treated with an antibiotic cocktail (AT) (experiments 1 and 2) or raised under germfree (GF) conditions (experiment 3). At 18 days posthatch (dph), they were orally inoculated either with 104 CFU of C. jejuni or with diluent. Cecal as well as systemic C. jejuni colonization, T- and B-cell numbers in the gut, and gut-associated tissue were compared between the different groups. Significantly higher numbers of CFU of C. jejuni were detected in the cecal contents of AT and GF birds, with higher colonization rates in spleen, liver, and ileum, than in birds with a conventional gut microbiota (P < 0.05). Significant upregulation of T and B lymphocyte numbers was detected in cecum, cecal tonsils, and bursa of Fabricius of AT or GF birds after C. jejuni inoculation compared to the respective controls (P < 0.05). This difference was less clear in birds with a conventional gut microbiota. Histopathological gut lesions were observed only in C. jejuni-inoculated AT and GF birds but not in microbiota-colonized C. jejuni-inoculated hatchmates. These results demonstrate that the gut microbiota may contribute to the control of C. jejuni colonization and prevent lesion development. Further studies are needed to identify key players of the gut microbiota and the mechanisms behind their protective role.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18016426
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180516135326.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1128/IAI.00380-17 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28808158
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Han, Zifeng $u University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Clinic for Poultry, Hannover, Germany.
245    10
$a Influence of the Gut Microbiota Composition on Campylobacter jejuni Colonization in Chickens / $c Z. Han, T. Willer, L. Li, C. Pielsticker, I. Rychlik, P. Velge, B. Kaspers, S. Rautenschlein,
520    9_
$a The Campylobacter jejuni-host interaction may be affected by the host's gut microbiota through competitive exclusion, metabolites, or modification of the immune response. To understand this interaction, C. jejuni colonization and local immune responses were compared in chickens with different gut microbiota compositions. Birds were treated with an antibiotic cocktail (AT) (experiments 1 and 2) or raised under germfree (GF) conditions (experiment 3). At 18 days posthatch (dph), they were orally inoculated either with 104 CFU of C. jejuni or with diluent. Cecal as well as systemic C. jejuni colonization, T- and B-cell numbers in the gut, and gut-associated tissue were compared between the different groups. Significantly higher numbers of CFU of C. jejuni were detected in the cecal contents of AT and GF birds, with higher colonization rates in spleen, liver, and ileum, than in birds with a conventional gut microbiota (P < 0.05). Significant upregulation of T and B lymphocyte numbers was detected in cecum, cecal tonsils, and bursa of Fabricius of AT or GF birds after C. jejuni inoculation compared to the respective controls (P < 0.05). This difference was less clear in birds with a conventional gut microbiota. Histopathological gut lesions were observed only in C. jejuni-inoculated AT and GF birds but not in microbiota-colonized C. jejuni-inoculated hatchmates. These results demonstrate that the gut microbiota may contribute to the control of C. jejuni colonization and prevent lesion development. Further studies are needed to identify key players of the gut microbiota and the mechanisms behind their protective role.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a antibakteriální látky $x farmakologie $7 D000900
650    _2
$a B-lymfocyty $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D001402
650    _2
$a bursa Fabricii $x účinky léků $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D002060
650    _2
$a kampylobakterové infekce $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $x veterinární $7 D002169
650    _2
$a Campylobacter jejuni $x účinky léků $x imunologie $x patogenita $7 D016123
650    _2
$a cékum $x účinky léků $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D002432
650    _2
$a kur domácí $7 D002645
650    _2
$a počet mikrobiálních kolonií $7 D015169
650    _2
$a střevní mikroflóra $x imunologie $7 D000069196
650    _2
$a gnotobiologické modely $x imunologie $7 D005856
650    _2
$a interakce hostitele a patogenu $x imunologie $7 D054884
650    _2
$a ileum $x účinky léků $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D007082
650    _2
$a játra $x účinky léků $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D008099
650    _2
$a mikrobiální interakce $x imunologie $7 D056265
650    _2
$a nemoci drůbeže $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D011201
650    _2
$a slezina $x účinky léků $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D013154
650    _2
$a T-lymfocyty $x imunologie $x mikrobiologie $7 D013601
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Willer, Thomas $u University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Clinic for Poultry, Hannover, Germany.
700    1_
$a Li, Li $u University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Clinic for Poultry, Hannover, Germany.
700    1_
$a Pielsticker, Colin $u University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Clinic for Poultry, Hannover, Germany.
700    1_
$a Rychlik, Ivan $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Velge, Philippe $u INRA, UMR1282 Infectiologie et Santé Publique, Nouzilly, France.
700    1_
$a Kaspers, Bernd $u Department for Veterinary Sciences, Institute for Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Rautenschlein, Silke $u University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Clinic for Poultry, Hannover, Germany Silke.Rautenschlein@tiho-hannover.de.
773    0_
$w MED00002235 $t Infection and immunity $x 1098-5522 $g Roč. 85, č. 11 (2017)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28808158 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180516135501 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300050 $s 1013266
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 85 $c 11 $e 20171018 $i 1098-5522 $m Infection and immunity $n Infect Immun $x MED00002235
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...