• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Does contrast between eggshell ground and spot coloration affect egg rejection

M. Dainson, ME. Hauber, AV. López, T. Grim, D. Hanley,

. 2017 ; 104 (7-8) : 54. [pub] 20170622

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18016529

Obligate avian brood parasitic species impose the costs of incubating foreign eggs and raising young upon their unrelated hosts. The most common host defence is the rejection of parasitic eggs from the nest. Both egg colours and spot patterns influence egg rejection decisions in many host species, yet no studies have explicitly examined the role of variation in spot coloration. We studied the American robin Turdus migratorius, a blue-green unspotted egg-laying host of the brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater, a brood parasite that lays non-mimetic spotted eggs. We examined host responses to model eggs with variable spot coloration against a constant robin-mimetic ground colour to identify patterns of rejection associated with perceived contrast between spot and ground colours. By using avian visual modelling, we found that robins were more likely to reject eggs whose spots had greater chromatic (hue) but not achromatic (brightness) contrast. Therefore, egg rejection decision rules in the American robin may depend on the colour contrast between parasite eggshell spot and host ground coloration. Our study also suggests that egg recognition in relation to spot coloration, like ground colour recognition, is tuned to the natural variation of avian eggshell spot colours but not to unnatural spot colours.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18016529
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180516151727.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2017 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00114-017-1476-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28642972
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Dainson, Miri $u Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, 10065, USA. miridainson@gmail.com.
245    10
$a Does contrast between eggshell ground and spot coloration affect egg rejection / $c M. Dainson, ME. Hauber, AV. López, T. Grim, D. Hanley,
520    9_
$a Obligate avian brood parasitic species impose the costs of incubating foreign eggs and raising young upon their unrelated hosts. The most common host defence is the rejection of parasitic eggs from the nest. Both egg colours and spot patterns influence egg rejection decisions in many host species, yet no studies have explicitly examined the role of variation in spot coloration. We studied the American robin Turdus migratorius, a blue-green unspotted egg-laying host of the brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater, a brood parasite that lays non-mimetic spotted eggs. We examined host responses to model eggs with variable spot coloration against a constant robin-mimetic ground colour to identify patterns of rejection associated with perceived contrast between spot and ground colours. By using avian visual modelling, we found that robins were more likely to reject eggs whose spots had greater chromatic (hue) but not achromatic (brightness) contrast. Therefore, egg rejection decision rules in the American robin may depend on the colour contrast between parasite eggshell spot and host ground coloration. Our study also suggests that egg recognition in relation to spot coloration, like ground colour recognition, is tuned to the natural variation of avian eggshell spot colours but not to unnatural spot colours.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a vaječná skořápka $7 D004528
650    _2
$a hnízdění $7 D009425
650    _2
$a ovum $7 D010063
650    _2
$a zpěvní ptáci $7 D020308
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hauber, Mark E $u Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, 10065, USA. Department of Animal Biology, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61801, USA.
700    1_
$a López, Analía V $u Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
700    1_
$a Grim, Tomáš $u Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University, 77146, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hanley, Daniel $u Department of Biology, Long Island University - Post, Brookville, New York, NY, 11548, USA.
773    0_
$w MED00003460 $t Naturwissenschaften $x 1432-1904 $g Roč. 104, č. 7-8 (2017), s. 54
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28642972 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180516151903 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300153 $s 1013369
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 104 $c 7-8 $d 54 $e 20170622 $i 1432-1904 $m Naturwissenschaften $n Naturwissenschaften $x MED00003460
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...