-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Does contrast between eggshell ground and spot coloration affect egg rejection
M. Dainson, ME. Hauber, AV. López, T. Grim, D. Hanley,
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- hnízdění MeSH
- ovum MeSH
- vaječná skořápka * MeSH
- zpěvní ptáci MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Obligate avian brood parasitic species impose the costs of incubating foreign eggs and raising young upon their unrelated hosts. The most common host defence is the rejection of parasitic eggs from the nest. Both egg colours and spot patterns influence egg rejection decisions in many host species, yet no studies have explicitly examined the role of variation in spot coloration. We studied the American robin Turdus migratorius, a blue-green unspotted egg-laying host of the brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater, a brood parasite that lays non-mimetic spotted eggs. We examined host responses to model eggs with variable spot coloration against a constant robin-mimetic ground colour to identify patterns of rejection associated with perceived contrast between spot and ground colours. By using avian visual modelling, we found that robins were more likely to reject eggs whose spots had greater chromatic (hue) but not achromatic (brightness) contrast. Therefore, egg rejection decision rules in the American robin may depend on the colour contrast between parasite eggshell spot and host ground coloration. Our study also suggests that egg recognition in relation to spot coloration, like ground colour recognition, is tuned to the natural variation of avian eggshell spot colours but not to unnatural spot colours.
Department of Biology Long Island University Post Brookville New York NY 11548 USA
Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology Palacký University 77146 Olomouc Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18016529
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180516151727.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180515s2017 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00114-017-1476-2 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28642972
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Dainson, Miri $u Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, 10065, USA. miridainson@gmail.com.
- 245 10
- $a Does contrast between eggshell ground and spot coloration affect egg rejection / $c M. Dainson, ME. Hauber, AV. López, T. Grim, D. Hanley,
- 520 9_
- $a Obligate avian brood parasitic species impose the costs of incubating foreign eggs and raising young upon their unrelated hosts. The most common host defence is the rejection of parasitic eggs from the nest. Both egg colours and spot patterns influence egg rejection decisions in many host species, yet no studies have explicitly examined the role of variation in spot coloration. We studied the American robin Turdus migratorius, a blue-green unspotted egg-laying host of the brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater, a brood parasite that lays non-mimetic spotted eggs. We examined host responses to model eggs with variable spot coloration against a constant robin-mimetic ground colour to identify patterns of rejection associated with perceived contrast between spot and ground colours. By using avian visual modelling, we found that robins were more likely to reject eggs whose spots had greater chromatic (hue) but not achromatic (brightness) contrast. Therefore, egg rejection decision rules in the American robin may depend on the colour contrast between parasite eggshell spot and host ground coloration. Our study also suggests that egg recognition in relation to spot coloration, like ground colour recognition, is tuned to the natural variation of avian eggshell spot colours but not to unnatural spot colours.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a vaječná skořápka $7 D004528
- 650 _2
- $a hnízdění $7 D009425
- 650 _2
- $a ovum $7 D010063
- 650 _2
- $a zpěvní ptáci $7 D020308
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hauber, Mark E $u Department of Psychology, Hunter College and the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, 10065, USA. Department of Animal Biology, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, 61801, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a López, Analía V $u Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, C1428EHA, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- 700 1_
- $a Grim, Tomáš $u Department of Zoology and Laboratory of Ornithology, Palacký University, 77146, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hanley, Daniel $u Department of Biology, Long Island University - Post, Brookville, New York, NY, 11548, USA.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003460 $t Naturwissenschaften $x 1432-1904 $g Roč. 104, č. 7-8 (2017), s. 54
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28642972 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180515 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180516151903 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1300153 $s 1013369
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 104 $c 7-8 $d 54 $e 20170622 $i 1432-1904 $m Naturwissenschaften $n Naturwissenschaften $x MED00003460
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180515