-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Purine derivate content and amino acid profile in larval stages of three edible insects
M. Bednářová, M. Borkovcová, T. Komprda,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
23633284
DOI
10.1002/jsfa.6198
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- aminokyseliny analýza MeSH
- brouci chemie MeSH
- dietní proteiny analýza MeSH
- dna (nemoc) MeSH
- druhová specificita MeSH
- Gryllidae chemie MeSH
- hmyz chemie MeSH
- hyperurikemie MeSH
- kur domácí MeSH
- larva chemie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- maso analýza MeSH
- puriny škodlivé účinky analýza MeSH
- Tenebrio chemie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND: Considering their high content of protein, insects are a valuable alternative protein source. However, no evaluation of their purine content has so far been done. High content of purine derivates may lead to the exclusion of such food from the diet of people with specific diseases. The aim of this study was to analyse the content of selected purine derivates and amino acid profile in the three insect species most often used for entomophagy in Europe and compare them with the purine content in egg white and chicken breast. RESULTS: The content of individual purine derivates and their total content were significantly dependent on insect species. The purine content in all three species was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in egg white, but some values were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in chicken breast. The total protein content was 548.9 g kg(-1) dry matter (DM) in mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), 551.6 g kg(-1) DM in superworm (Zophobas atratus) and 564.9 g kg(-1) DM in cricket (Gryllus assimilis). CONCLUSION: Larvae of mealworm and superworm are protein-rich and purine-low meat alternatives. In contrast, cricket nymphs are protein-rich and purine-rich and cannot be recommended for people with hyperuricemia or gout.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14064187
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140710093547.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140704s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/jsfa.6198 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23633284
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Bednářová, Martina $u Department of Information Technology, University Workplaces, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Purine derivate content and amino acid profile in larval stages of three edible insects / $c M. Bednářová, M. Borkovcová, T. Komprda,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Considering their high content of protein, insects are a valuable alternative protein source. However, no evaluation of their purine content has so far been done. High content of purine derivates may lead to the exclusion of such food from the diet of people with specific diseases. The aim of this study was to analyse the content of selected purine derivates and amino acid profile in the three insect species most often used for entomophagy in Europe and compare them with the purine content in egg white and chicken breast. RESULTS: The content of individual purine derivates and their total content were significantly dependent on insect species. The purine content in all three species was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in egg white, but some values were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than in chicken breast. The total protein content was 548.9 g kg(-1) dry matter (DM) in mealworm (Tenebrio molitor), 551.6 g kg(-1) DM in superworm (Zophobas atratus) and 564.9 g kg(-1) DM in cricket (Gryllus assimilis). CONCLUSION: Larvae of mealworm and superworm are protein-rich and purine-low meat alternatives. In contrast, cricket nymphs are protein-rich and purine-rich and cannot be recommended for people with hyperuricemia or gout.
- 650 _2
- $a aminokyseliny $x analýza $7 D000596
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a brouci $x chemie $7 D001517
- 650 _2
- $a kur domácí $7 D002645
- 650 _2
- $a dietní proteiny $x analýza $7 D004044
- 650 _2
- $a dna (nemoc) $7 D006073
- 650 _2
- $a Gryllidae $x chemie $7 D006135
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hyperurikemie $7 D033461
- 650 _2
- $a hmyz $x chemie $7 D007313
- 650 _2
- $a larva $x chemie $7 D007814
- 650 _2
- $a maso $x analýza $7 D008460
- 650 _2
- $a puriny $x škodlivé účinky $x analýza $7 D011687
- 650 _2
- $a druhová specificita $7 D013045
- 650 _2
- $a Tenebrio $x chemie $7 D013712
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Borkovcová, Marie
- 700 1_
- $a Komprda, Tomáš
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003015 $t Journal of the science of food and agriculture $x 1097-0010 $g Roč. 94, č. 1 (2014), s. 71-6
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23633284 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140704 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140710093839 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1031671 $s 862919
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 94 $c 1 $d 71-6 $i 1097-0010 $m Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture $n J Sci Food Agric $x MED00003015
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140704