Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

SGH: stress or strain gradient hypothesis? Insights from an elevation gradient on the roof of the world

P. Liancourt, Y. Le Bagousse-Pinguet, C. Rixen, J. Dolezal,

. 2017 ; 120 (1) : 29-38.

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK PubMed Central from 1995 to 1 year ago
Europe PubMed Central from 1995 to 1 year ago
Open Access Digital Library from 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 1996-01-01 to 1 year ago

Background and Aims: The stress gradient hypothesis (SGH), the view that competition prevails in undisturbed and productive environments, and shifts to facilitation in disturbed or stressful environments, has become a central paradigm in ecology. However, an alternative view proposes that the relationship between biotic interactions and environmental severity should be unimodal instead of monotonic. Possible causes of discrepancies between these two views were examined in the high elevation desert of the arid Trans-Himalayas. Methods: A putative nurse species and its associated plant community was surveyed over its entire elevation range, spanning from alpine to desert vegetation belts. The results were analysed at the community level (vegetation cover and species richness), considering the distinction between the intensity and the importance of biotic interactions. Interactions at the species level (pairwise interactions) were also considered, i.e. the variation of biotic interactions within the niche of a species, for which the abundance (species cover) and probability of occurrence (presence/absence) for the most widespread species along the gradient were distinguished. Key Results: Overall, facilitation was infrequent in our study system; however, it was observed for the two most widespread species. At the community level, the intensity and importance of biotic interactions showed a unimodal pattern. The departure from the prediction of the SGH happened abruptly where the nurse species entered the desert vegetation belt at the lowest elevation. This abrupt shift was attributed to the turnover of species with contrasting tolerances. At the species level, however, facilitation increased consistently as the level of stress increases and individuals deviate from their optimum (increasing strain). Conclusion: While the stress gradient hypothesis was not supported along our elevation gradient at the community level, the strain gradient hypothesis, considering how species perceive the ambient level of stress and deviate from their optimum, provided a parsimonious explanation for the outcome of plant-plant interactions at both scales.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18016641
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180515103624.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2017 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/aob/mcx037 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28444363
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Liancourt, Pierre $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82 Trebon, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a SGH: stress or strain gradient hypothesis? Insights from an elevation gradient on the roof of the world / $c P. Liancourt, Y. Le Bagousse-Pinguet, C. Rixen, J. Dolezal,
520    9_
$a Background and Aims: The stress gradient hypothesis (SGH), the view that competition prevails in undisturbed and productive environments, and shifts to facilitation in disturbed or stressful environments, has become a central paradigm in ecology. However, an alternative view proposes that the relationship between biotic interactions and environmental severity should be unimodal instead of monotonic. Possible causes of discrepancies between these two views were examined in the high elevation desert of the arid Trans-Himalayas. Methods: A putative nurse species and its associated plant community was surveyed over its entire elevation range, spanning from alpine to desert vegetation belts. The results were analysed at the community level (vegetation cover and species richness), considering the distinction between the intensity and the importance of biotic interactions. Interactions at the species level (pairwise interactions) were also considered, i.e. the variation of biotic interactions within the niche of a species, for which the abundance (species cover) and probability of occurrence (presence/absence) for the most widespread species along the gradient were distinguished. Key Results: Overall, facilitation was infrequent in our study system; however, it was observed for the two most widespread species. At the community level, the intensity and importance of biotic interactions showed a unimodal pattern. The departure from the prediction of the SGH happened abruptly where the nurse species entered the desert vegetation belt at the lowest elevation. This abrupt shift was attributed to the turnover of species with contrasting tolerances. At the species level, however, facilitation increased consistently as the level of stress increases and individuals deviate from their optimum (increasing strain). Conclusion: While the stress gradient hypothesis was not supported along our elevation gradient at the community level, the strain gradient hypothesis, considering how species perceive the ambient level of stress and deviate from their optimum, provided a parsimonious explanation for the outcome of plant-plant interactions at both scales.
650    12
$a nadmořská výška $7 D000531
650    _2
$a pouštní klima $7 D003889
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    12
$a vývoj rostlin $7 D063245
650    12
$a fyziologie rostlin $7 D018521
650    _2
$a rostliny $7 D010944
650    12
$a fyziologický stres $7 D013312
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Le Bagousse-Pinguet, Yoann $u Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Escuela Superior de Ciencias Experimentales y Tecnología, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, C/ Tulipán s/n, 28933 Móstoles, Spain.
700    1_
$a Rixen, Christian $u WSL Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos Dorf, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Dolezal, Jiri $u Institute of Botany, Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82 Trebon, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Na Zlate stoce 1, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 120, č. 1 (2017), s. 29-38
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28444363 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180515103757 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300265 $s 1013481
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 120 $c 1 $d 29-38 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...