-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Can auscultatory blood pressure normative values be used for evaluation of oscillometric blood pressure in children
T. Šuláková, A. Šuláková, J. Strnadel, J. Pavlíček, B. Obermannová, J. Feber,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
PubMed Central
od 2001
Wiley Free Content
od 2001
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1999
PubMed
28383188
DOI
10.1111/jch.12943
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- ambulantní monitorování krevního tlaku metody MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- krevní tlak fyziologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- měření krevního tlaku metody MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- oscilometrie přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- poslech přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The aim of the study was to analyze whether auscultatory normative values (Fourth Task Force [4TF]) can be applied to blood pressure (BP) obtained by oscillometric devices. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of oscillometric office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring in 229 children (116 boys), median age 15.31 years. Office systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) values were converted into Z scores using 4TF and oscillometric (German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescent [KiGGS]) reference values. There was good correlation between the two normative methods (r=0.9773 for SBP, r=0.9627 for DBP). Results from Bland-Altman test revealed only minimal differences in Z scores between 4TF and KiGGS for SBP, but a significant proportional error for DBP. 4TF and KiGGS Z scores were equally predictive of ambulatory hypertension. In conclusion, auscultatory and oscillometric normative data are interchangeable for SBP but not for DBP.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18016678
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180521095505.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180515s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/jch.12943 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28383188
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Šuláková, Terezie $u Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Ostrava and Medical Faculty University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Can auscultatory blood pressure normative values be used for evaluation of oscillometric blood pressure in children / $c T. Šuláková, A. Šuláková, J. Strnadel, J. Pavlíček, B. Obermannová, J. Feber,
- 520 9_
- $a The aim of the study was to analyze whether auscultatory normative values (Fourth Task Force [4TF]) can be applied to blood pressure (BP) obtained by oscillometric devices. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of oscillometric office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring in 229 children (116 boys), median age 15.31 years. Office systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) values were converted into Z scores using 4TF and oscillometric (German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescent [KiGGS]) reference values. There was good correlation between the two normative methods (r=0.9773 for SBP, r=0.9627 for DBP). Results from Bland-Altman test revealed only minimal differences in Z scores between 4TF and KiGGS for SBP, but a significant proportional error for DBP. 4TF and KiGGS Z scores were equally predictive of ambulatory hypertension. In conclusion, auscultatory and oscillometric normative data are interchangeable for SBP but not for DBP.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a poslech $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D001314
- 650 _2
- $a krevní tlak $x fyziologie $7 D001794
- 650 _2
- $a měření krevního tlaku $x metody $7 D001795
- 650 _2
- $a ambulantní monitorování krevního tlaku $x metody $7 D018660
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a oscilometrie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D009991
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Šuláková, Astrida $u Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Ostrava and Medical Faculty University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Strnadel, Jiří $u Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Ostrava and Medical Faculty University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pavlíček, Jan $u Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Ostrava and Medical Faculty University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Obermannová, Barbora $u Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Feber, Janusz $u Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario Ottawa and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188110 $t Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) $x 1751-7176 $g Roč. 19, č. 4 (2017), s. 381-387
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28383188 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180515 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180521095647 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1300302 $s 1013518
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 19 $c 4 $d 381-387 $e 20161107 $i 1751-7176 $m The journal of clinical hypertension $n J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) $x MED00188110
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180515