-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Correlation between transversal and orthogonal maximal diameters of abdominal aortic aneurysms and alternative rupture risk predictors
K. Novak, S. Polzer, T. Krivka, R. Vlachovsky, R. Staffa, L. Kubicek, L. Lambert, J. Bursa,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 2003-01-01 do 2023-12-31
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2003-01-01 do 2023-12-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2003-01-01 do 2023-12-31
- MeSH
- aneurysma břišní aorty diagnostické zobrazování epidemiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- aorta abdominalis diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- CT angiografie metody statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- hodnocení rizik metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- modely kardiovaskulární MeSH
- počítačová simulace MeSH
- prasklé aneurysma diagnostické zobrazování epidemiologie patofyziologie MeSH
- prevalence MeSH
- rentgenový obraz - interpretace počítačová metody MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- statistika jako téma MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika epidemiologie MeSH
PURPOSE: There is no standard for measuring maximal diameter (Dmax) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from computer tomography (CT) images although differences between Dmax evaluated from transversal (axialDmax) or orthogonal (orthoDmax) planes can be large especially for angulated AAAs. Therefore we investigated their correlations with alternative rupture risk indicators as peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture risk (PWRR) to decide which Dmax is more relevant in AAA rupture risk assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Dmax values were measured by a trained radiologist from 70 collected CT scans, and the corresponding PWS and PWRR were evaluated using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). The cohort was ordered according to the difference between axialDmax and orthoDmax (Da-o) quantifying the aneurysm angulation, and Spearman's correlation coefficients between PWS/PWRR - orthoDmax/axialDmax were calculated. RESULTS: The calculated correlations PWS/PWRR vs. orthoDmax were substantially higher for angulated AAAs (with Da-o≥3mm). Under this limit, the correlations were almost the same for both Dmax values. Analysis of AAAs divided into two groups of angulated (n=38) and straight (n=32) cases revealed that both groups are similar in all parameters (orthoDmax, PWS, PWRR) with the exception of axialDmax (p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: It was confirmed that orthoDmax is better correlated with the alternative rupture risk predictors PWS and PWRR for angulated AAAs (DA-O≥3mm) while there is no difference between orthoDmax and axialDmax for straight AAAs (DA-O<3mm). As angulated AAAs represent a significant portion of cases it can be recommended to use orthoDmax as the only Dmax parameter for AAA rupture risk assessment.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18016731
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180523095051.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180515s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.03.005 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28282590
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Novak, Kamil $u Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kamil.novak@centrum.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Correlation between transversal and orthogonal maximal diameters of abdominal aortic aneurysms and alternative rupture risk predictors / $c K. Novak, S. Polzer, T. Krivka, R. Vlachovsky, R. Staffa, L. Kubicek, L. Lambert, J. Bursa,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: There is no standard for measuring maximal diameter (Dmax) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) from computer tomography (CT) images although differences between Dmax evaluated from transversal (axialDmax) or orthogonal (orthoDmax) planes can be large especially for angulated AAAs. Therefore we investigated their correlations with alternative rupture risk indicators as peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture risk (PWRR) to decide which Dmax is more relevant in AAA rupture risk assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Dmax values were measured by a trained radiologist from 70 collected CT scans, and the corresponding PWS and PWRR were evaluated using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). The cohort was ordered according to the difference between axialDmax and orthoDmax (Da-o) quantifying the aneurysm angulation, and Spearman's correlation coefficients between PWS/PWRR - orthoDmax/axialDmax were calculated. RESULTS: The calculated correlations PWS/PWRR vs. orthoDmax were substantially higher for angulated AAAs (with Da-o≥3mm). Under this limit, the correlations were almost the same for both Dmax values. Analysis of AAAs divided into two groups of angulated (n=38) and straight (n=32) cases revealed that both groups are similar in all parameters (orthoDmax, PWS, PWRR) with the exception of axialDmax (p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: It was confirmed that orthoDmax is better correlated with the alternative rupture risk predictors PWS and PWRR for angulated AAAs (DA-O≥3mm) while there is no difference between orthoDmax and axialDmax for straight AAAs (DA-O<3mm). As angulated AAAs represent a significant portion of cases it can be recommended to use orthoDmax as the only Dmax parameter for AAA rupture risk assessment.
- 650 _2
- $a prasklé aneurysma $x diagnostické zobrazování $x epidemiologie $x patofyziologie $7 D017542
- 650 _2
- $a aorta abdominalis $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001012
- 650 _2
- $a aneurysma břišní aorty $x diagnostické zobrazování $x epidemiologie $x patofyziologie $7 D017544
- 650 _2
- $a CT angiografie $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D000072226
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová simulace $7 D003198
- 650 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a modely kardiovaskulární $7 D008955
- 650 _2
- $a prevalence $7 D015995
- 650 _2
- $a rentgenový obraz - interpretace počítačová $x metody $7 D011857
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $x metody $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a statistika jako téma $7 D013223
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Polzer, Stanislav $u Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Krivka, Tomas $u Department of Medical Imaging, St. Anne´s University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vlachovsky, Robert $u 2(nd) Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Staffa, Robert $u 2(nd) Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kubicek, Lubos $u 2(nd) Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Lambert, Lukas $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bursa, Jiri $u Institute of Solid Mechanics, Mechatronics and Biomechanics, Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001218 $t Computers in biology and medicine $x 1879-0534 $g Roč. 83, č. - (2017), s. 151-156
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28282590 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180515 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180523095236 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1300355 $s 1013571
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 83 $c - $d 151-156 $e 20170306 $i 1879-0534 $m Computers in biology and medicine $n Comput Biol Med $x MED00001218
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180515
