• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Registered Replication Report: Study 1 From Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002)

I. Cheung, L. Campbell, EP. LeBel, RA. Ackerman, B. Aykutog˘lu, Š. Bahník, JD. Bowen, CA. Bredow, C. Bromberg, PA. Caprariello, RJ. Carcedo, KJ. Carson, RJ. Cobb, NL. Collins, CA. Corretti, TE. DiDonato, C. Ellithorpe, N. Fernández-Rouco, PT....

. 2016 ; 11 (5) : 750-764.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18017012

Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, and Hannon (2002, Study 1) demonstrated a causal link between subjective commitment to a relationship and how people responded to hypothetical betrayals of that relationship. Participants primed to think about their commitment to their partner (high commitment) reacted to the betrayals with reduced exit and neglect responses relative to those primed to think about their independence from their partner (low commitment). The priming manipulation did not affect constructive voice and loyalty responses. Although other studies have demonstrated a correlation between subjective commitment and responses to betrayal, this study provides the only experimental evidence that inducing changes to subjective commitment can causally affect forgiveness responses. This Registered Replication Report (RRR) meta-analytically combines the results of 16 new direct replications of the original study, all of which followed a standardized, vetted, and preregistered protocol. The results showed little effect of the priming manipulation on the forgiveness outcome measures, but it also did not observe an effect of priming on subjective commitment, so the manipulation did not work as it had in the original study. We discuss possible explanations for the discrepancy between the findings from this RRR and the original study.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18017012
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180524094355.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/1745691616664694 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27694468
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Cheung, Irene $u Department of Psychology, Huron University College at The University of Western Ontario icheung5@uwo.ca.
245    10
$a Registered Replication Report: Study 1 From Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002) / $c I. Cheung, L. Campbell, EP. LeBel, RA. Ackerman, B. Aykutog˘lu, Š. Bahník, JD. Bowen, CA. Bredow, C. Bromberg, PA. Caprariello, RJ. Carcedo, KJ. Carson, RJ. Cobb, NL. Collins, CA. Corretti, TE. DiDonato, C. Ellithorpe, N. Fernández-Rouco, PT. Fuglestad, RM. Goldberg, FD. Golom, E. Gündog˘du-Aktürk, LB. Hoplock, P. Houdek, HS. Kane, JS. Kim, S. Kraus, CT. Leone, NP. Li, JM. Logan, RD. Millman, MM. Morry, JC. Pink, T. Ritchey, LM. Root Luna, HC. Sinclair, DA. Stinson, TA. Sucharyna, ND. Tidwell, A. Uysal, M. Vranka, LA. Winczewski, JC. Yong,
520    9_
$a Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, and Hannon (2002, Study 1) demonstrated a causal link between subjective commitment to a relationship and how people responded to hypothetical betrayals of that relationship. Participants primed to think about their commitment to their partner (high commitment) reacted to the betrayals with reduced exit and neglect responses relative to those primed to think about their independence from their partner (low commitment). The priming manipulation did not affect constructive voice and loyalty responses. Although other studies have demonstrated a correlation between subjective commitment and responses to betrayal, this study provides the only experimental evidence that inducing changes to subjective commitment can causally affect forgiveness responses. This Registered Replication Report (RRR) meta-analytically combines the results of 16 new direct replications of the original study, all of which followed a standardized, vetted, and preregistered protocol. The results showed little effect of the priming manipulation on the forgiveness outcome measures, but it also did not observe an effect of priming on subjective commitment, so the manipulation did not work as it had in the original study. We discuss possible explanations for the discrepancy between the findings from this RRR and the original study.
650    _2
$a odpuštění $7 D061347
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a interpersonální vztahy $7 D007398
650    _2
$a opakované seznamování se skutečností $7 D060865
650    _2
$a sexuální chování $7 D012725
650    _2
$a myšlení $7 D013850
650    _2
$a důvěra $7 D035502
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
700    1_
$a Campbell, Lorne $u Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario.
700    1_
$a LeBel, Etienne P $u Berkeley Initiative for Transparency in the Social Sciences, University of California, Berkeley.
700    1_
$a Ackerman, Robert A $u The University of Texas at Dallas
700    1_
$a Aykutog˘lu, Bülent $u Middle East Technical University
700    1_
$a Bahník, Šteˇpán $u University of Würzburg
700    1_
$a Bowen, Jeffrey D $u University of California, Santa Barbara
700    1_
$a Bredow, Carrie A $u Hope College
700    1_
$a Bromberg, Christopher $u University of California, Santa Barbara
700    1_
$a Caprariello, Peter A $u Stony Brook University
700    1_
$a Carcedo, Rodrigo J $u University of Salamanca
700    1_
$a Carson, Kevin J $u The University of Texas at Dallas
700    1_
$a Cobb, Rebecca J $u Simon Fraser University
700    1_
$a Collins, Nancy L $u University of California, Santa Barbara
700    1_
$a Corretti, Conrad A $u The University of Texas at Dallas
700    1_
$a DiDonato, Theresa E $u Loyola University Maryland
700    1_
$a Ellithorpe, Chelsea $u Mississippi State University
700    1_
$a Fernández-Rouco, Noelia $u University of Cantabria
700    1_
$a Fuglestad, Paul T $u University of North Florida
700    1_
$a Goldberg, Rebecca M $u Mississippi State University
700    1_
$a Golom, Frank D $u Loyola University Maryland
700    1_
$a Gündog˘du-Aktürk, Elçin $u Middle East Technical University
700    1_
$a Hoplock, Lisa B $u University of Victoria
700    1_
$a Houdek, Petr $u University of Economics, Prague
700    1_
$a Kane, Heidi S $u The University of Texas at Dallas
700    1_
$a Kim, John S $u Lesley University
700    1_
$a Kraus, Sue $u Fort Lewis College
700    1_
$a Leone, Christopher T $u University of North Florida
700    1_
$a Li, Norman P $u Singapore Management University
700    1_
$a Logan, Jill M $u Simon Fraser University
700    1_
$a Millman, Roanne D $u Simon Fraser University
700    1_
$a Morry, Marian M $u University of Manitoba
700    1_
$a Pink, Jennifer C $u Simon Fraser University
700    1_
$a Ritchey, Taylor $u Mississippi State University
700    1_
$a Root Luna, Lindsey M $u Hope College
700    1_
$a Sinclair, H Colleen $u Mississippi State University
700    1_
$a Stinson, Danu Anthony $u University of Victoria
700    1_
$a Sucharyna, Tamara A $u University of Manitoba
700    1_
$a Tidwell, Natasha D $u Fort Lewis College
700    1_
$a Uysal, Ahmet $u Middle East Technical University
700    1_
$a Vranka, Marek $u Charles University in Prague
700    1_
$a Winczewski, Lauren A $u University of California, Santa Barbara
700    1_
$a Yong, Jose C $u Singapore Management University
773    0_
$w MED00195146 $t Perspectives on psychological science a journal of the Association for Psychological Science $x 1745-6924 $g Roč. 11, č. 5 (2016), s. 750-764
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27694468 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180524094541 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300636 $s 1013852
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 11 $c 5 $d 750-764 $i 1745-6924 $m Perspectives on psychological science $n Perspect Psychol Sci $x MED00195146
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace