Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Combination treatment with mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder: exploratory responder analyses of efficacy and evaluation of patient-reported outcomes from a randomized, double-blind, factorial, dose-ranging, Phase II study (SYMPHONY)

P. Abrams, C. Kelleher, D. Staskin, R. Kay, A. Martan, I. Mincik, D. Newgreen, A. Ridder, A. Paireddy, R. van Maanen,

. 2017 ; 35 (5) : 827-838. [pub] 20160811

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze II, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18017100
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-02-01 do 2017-12-31
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-02-01 do 2017-12-31

PURPOSE: This large dose-ranging study explored the benefits of different combinations of mirabegron and solifenacin on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and patients ('responders') achieving clinically meaningful improvements in efficacy and HRQoL. METHODS: SYMPHONY (NCT01340027) was a Phase II, placebo- and monotherapy-controlled, dose-ranging, 12-week trial. Adult patients with overactive bladder (OAB) for ≥3 months were randomized to 1 of 12 groups: 6 combination (solifenacin 2.5/5/10 mg + mirabegron 25/50 mg), 5 monotherapy (solifenacin 2.5/5/10 mg, or mirabegron 25/50 mg), or placebo. Change from baseline to end of treatment was assessed, versus placebo and solifenacin 5 mg in: PROs (OAB-q [Symptom Bother/total HRQoL] and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition score), and responders achieving minimally important differences (MIDs) in PROs and predetermined clinically meaningful improvements in efficacy (e.g. <8 micturitions/24 h). Changes in PROs and responders were analysed using an ANCOVA model and logistic regression, respectively. RESULTS: The Full Analysis Set included 1278 patients. Combination therapy of solifenacin 5/10 mg + mirabegron 25/50 mg significantly improved PROs versus solifenacin 5 mg and placebo, and significantly more responders achieved MIDs in PROs and efficacy. Micturition frequency normalization was approximately twofold greater with 10 + 25 mg (OR 2.06 [95 % CI 1.11, 3.84; p = 0.023]) and 5 + 50 mg (OR 1.91 [95 % CI 1.14, 3.21; p = 0.015]) versus solifenacin 5 mg. CONCLUSION: Combining mirabegron 25/50 mg and solifenacin 5/10 mg improves objective and subjective efficacy outcomes compared with placebo or solifenacin 5 mg.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18017100
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180516152548.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2017 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00345-016-1908-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27514371
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Abrams, P $u Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK. paul.abrams@bui.ac.uk.
245    10
$a Combination treatment with mirabegron and solifenacin in patients with overactive bladder: exploratory responder analyses of efficacy and evaluation of patient-reported outcomes from a randomized, double-blind, factorial, dose-ranging, Phase II study (SYMPHONY) / $c P. Abrams, C. Kelleher, D. Staskin, R. Kay, A. Martan, I. Mincik, D. Newgreen, A. Ridder, A. Paireddy, R. van Maanen,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: This large dose-ranging study explored the benefits of different combinations of mirabegron and solifenacin on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and patients ('responders') achieving clinically meaningful improvements in efficacy and HRQoL. METHODS: SYMPHONY (NCT01340027) was a Phase II, placebo- and monotherapy-controlled, dose-ranging, 12-week trial. Adult patients with overactive bladder (OAB) for ≥3 months were randomized to 1 of 12 groups: 6 combination (solifenacin 2.5/5/10 mg + mirabegron 25/50 mg), 5 monotherapy (solifenacin 2.5/5/10 mg, or mirabegron 25/50 mg), or placebo. Change from baseline to end of treatment was assessed, versus placebo and solifenacin 5 mg in: PROs (OAB-q [Symptom Bother/total HRQoL] and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition score), and responders achieving minimally important differences (MIDs) in PROs and predetermined clinically meaningful improvements in efficacy (e.g. <8 micturitions/24 h). Changes in PROs and responders were analysed using an ANCOVA model and logistic regression, respectively. RESULTS: The Full Analysis Set included 1278 patients. Combination therapy of solifenacin 5/10 mg + mirabegron 25/50 mg significantly improved PROs versus solifenacin 5 mg and placebo, and significantly more responders achieved MIDs in PROs and efficacy. Micturition frequency normalization was approximately twofold greater with 10 + 25 mg (OR 2.06 [95 % CI 1.11, 3.84; p = 0.023]) and 5 + 50 mg (OR 1.91 [95 % CI 1.14, 3.21; p = 0.015]) versus solifenacin 5 mg. CONCLUSION: Combining mirabegron 25/50 mg and solifenacin 5/10 mg improves objective and subjective efficacy outcomes compared with placebo or solifenacin 5 mg.
650    _2
$a acetanilidy $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000083
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a kombinovaná farmakoterapie $7 D004359
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a zdravotní stav $7 D006304
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a minimální klinicky významný rozdíl $7 D000071081
650    _2
$a hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem $7 D000071066
650    12
$a kvalita života $7 D011788
650    _2
$a solifenacin sukcinát $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000069464
650    _2
$a thiazoly $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D013844
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a hyperaktivní močový měchýř $x farmakoterapie $7 D053201
650    _2
$a urologické látky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D064804
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze II $7 D017427
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Kelleher, C $u Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK.
700    1_
$a Staskin, D $u Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
700    1_
$a Kay, R $u RK Statistics Ltd, Bakewell, UK.
700    1_
$a Martan, A $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mincik, I $u Faculty of Healthcare of the University of Prešov, Prešov, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Newgreen, D $u Astellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Ridder, A $u Astellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Paireddy, A $u Astellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a van Maanen, R $u Astellas Pharma BV, Leiden, The Netherlands.
773    0_
$w MED00004739 $t World journal of urology $x 1433-8726 $g Roč. 35, č. 5 (2017), s. 827-838
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27514371 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180516152723 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1300724 $s 1013940
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 35 $c 5 $d 827-838 $e 20160811 $i 1433-8726 $m World journal of urology $n World J Urol $x MED00004739
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...