• Something wrong with this record ?

Is surgery for pineal cysts safe and effective? Short review

M. Májovský, D. Netuka, V. Beneš,

. 2018 ; 41 (1) : 119-124. [pub] 20170712

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Review

Grant support
NV15-32791A MZ0 CEP Register

In this short review, the authors performed a database search and summarize current knowledge of the management of patients with pineal cysts (PCs) and investigate the role of surgical treatment. The scientific literature on the surgical treatment of PCs is sparse and encompasses only case series with little over 200 operated patients combined. All included papers reported favorable results after pineal cyst surgery with improvement of symptoms in most patients. Microsurgical resection of PCs, preferably using the supracerebellar-infratentorial approach, could be considered as a viable treatment option in symptomatic patients. Even patients with non-specific symptoms are reported to improve after surgery. However, evidence offered by this literature review is very limited and therefore our conclusions must be tempered by the restricted set of data. For ethical reasons, a randomized controlled trial is not an acceptable approach, and therefore patient registry could be a useful tool to identify a subset of symptomatic patients that might benefit from pineal cyst resection.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024846
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20201109154055.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10143-017-0876-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28702847
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Májovský, Martin $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, U Vojenske nemocnice, 1200, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Is surgery for pineal cysts safe and effective? Short review / $c M. Májovský, D. Netuka, V. Beneš,
520    9_
$a In this short review, the authors performed a database search and summarize current knowledge of the management of patients with pineal cysts (PCs) and investigate the role of surgical treatment. The scientific literature on the surgical treatment of PCs is sparse and encompasses only case series with little over 200 operated patients combined. All included papers reported favorable results after pineal cyst surgery with improvement of symptoms in most patients. Microsurgical resection of PCs, preferably using the supracerebellar-infratentorial approach, could be considered as a viable treatment option in symptomatic patients. Even patients with non-specific symptoms are reported to improve after surgery. However, evidence offered by this literature review is very limited and therefore our conclusions must be tempered by the restricted set of data. For ethical reasons, a randomized controlled trial is not an acceptable approach, and therefore patient registry could be a useful tool to identify a subset of symptomatic patients that might benefit from pineal cyst resection.
650    _2
$a nádory mozku $x chirurgie $7 D001932
650    _2
$a cysty centrálního nervového systému $x chirurgie $7 D020863
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a výběr pacientů $7 D018579
650    12
$a epifýza mozková $7 D010870
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Netuka, David $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, U Vojenske nemocnice, 1200, Prague 6, Czech Republic. netuka.david@gmail.com.
700    1_
$a Beneš, Vladimír $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Military University Hospital, U Vojenske nemocnice, 1200, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00003513 $t Neurosurgical review $x 1437-2320 $g Roč. 41, č. 1 (2018), s. 119-124
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28702847 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20201109154054 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1316977 $s 1021767
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 41 $c 1 $d 119-124 $e 20170712 $i 1437-2320 $m Neurosurgical review $n Neurosurg Rev $x MED00003513
GRA    __
$a NV15-32791A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...