Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Dynamics of tandemly repeated DNA sequences during evolution of diploid and tetraploid botiid loaches (Teleostei: Cobitoidea: Botiidae)

A. Sember, J. Bohlen, V. Šlechtová, M. Altmanová, Š. Pelikánová, P. Ráb,

. 2018 ; 13 (3) : e0195054. [pub] 20180328

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Polyploidization has played an important role in the evolution of vertebrates, particularly at the base of Teleostei-an enormously successful ray-finned fish group with additional genome doublings on lower taxonomic levels. The investigation of post-polyploid genome dynamics might provide important clues about the evolution and ecology of respective species and can help to decipher the role of polyploidy per se on speciation. Few studies have attempted to investigate the dynamics of repetitive DNA sequences in the post-polyploid genome using molecular cytogenetic tools in fishes, though recent efforts demonstrated their usefulness. The demonstrably monophyletic freshwater loach family Botiidae, branching to evolutionary diploid and tetraploid lineages separated >25 Mya, offers a suited model group for comparing the long-term repetitive DNA evolution. For this, we integrated phylogenetic analyses with cytogenetical survey involving Giemsa- and Chromomycin A3 (CMA3)/DAPI stainings and fluorescence in situ hybridization with 5S/45S rDNA, U2 snDNA and telomeric probes in representative sample of 12 botiid species. The karyotypes of all diploids were composed of 2n = 50 chromosomes, while majority of tetraploids had 2n = 4x = 100, with only subtle interspecific karyotype differences. The exceptional karyotype of Botia dario (2n = 4x = 96) suggested centric fusions behind the 2n reduction. Variable patterns of FISH signals revealed cases of intraspecific polymorphisms, rDNA amplification, variable degree of correspondence with CMA3+ sites and almost no phylogenetic signal. In tetraploids, either additivity or loci gain/loss was recorded. Despite absence of classical interstitial telomeric sites, large blocks of interspersed rDNA/telomeric regions were found in diploids only. We uncovered different molecular drives of studied repetitive DNA classes within botiid genomes as well as the advanced stage of the re-diploidization process in tetraploids. Our results may contribute to link genomic approach with molecular cytogenetic analyses in addressing the origin and mechanism of this polyploidization event.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033214
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181010125456.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0195054 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29590207
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Sember, Alexandr $u Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, Liběchov, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Dynamics of tandemly repeated DNA sequences during evolution of diploid and tetraploid botiid loaches (Teleostei: Cobitoidea: Botiidae) / $c A. Sember, J. Bohlen, V. Šlechtová, M. Altmanová, Š. Pelikánová, P. Ráb,
520    9_
$a Polyploidization has played an important role in the evolution of vertebrates, particularly at the base of Teleostei-an enormously successful ray-finned fish group with additional genome doublings on lower taxonomic levels. The investigation of post-polyploid genome dynamics might provide important clues about the evolution and ecology of respective species and can help to decipher the role of polyploidy per se on speciation. Few studies have attempted to investigate the dynamics of repetitive DNA sequences in the post-polyploid genome using molecular cytogenetic tools in fishes, though recent efforts demonstrated their usefulness. The demonstrably monophyletic freshwater loach family Botiidae, branching to evolutionary diploid and tetraploid lineages separated >25 Mya, offers a suited model group for comparing the long-term repetitive DNA evolution. For this, we integrated phylogenetic analyses with cytogenetical survey involving Giemsa- and Chromomycin A3 (CMA3)/DAPI stainings and fluorescence in situ hybridization with 5S/45S rDNA, U2 snDNA and telomeric probes in representative sample of 12 botiid species. The karyotypes of all diploids were composed of 2n = 50 chromosomes, while majority of tetraploids had 2n = 4x = 100, with only subtle interspecific karyotype differences. The exceptional karyotype of Botia dario (2n = 4x = 96) suggested centric fusions behind the 2n reduction. Variable patterns of FISH signals revealed cases of intraspecific polymorphisms, rDNA amplification, variable degree of correspondence with CMA3+ sites and almost no phylogenetic signal. In tetraploids, either additivity or loci gain/loss was recorded. Despite absence of classical interstitial telomeric sites, large blocks of interspersed rDNA/telomeric regions were found in diploids only. We uncovered different molecular drives of studied repetitive DNA classes within botiid genomes as well as the advanced stage of the re-diploidization process in tetraploids. Our results may contribute to link genomic approach with molecular cytogenetic analyses in addressing the origin and mechanism of this polyploidization event.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
650    _2
$a máloostní $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D003531
650    _2
$a ribozomální DNA $x genetika $7 D004275
650    12
$a diploidie $7 D004171
650    _2
$a karyotypizace $7 D007621
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    12
$a tandemové repetitivní sekvence $7 D020080
650    12
$a tetraploidie $7 D057891
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Bohlen, Jörg $u Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, Liběchov, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šlechtová, Vendula $u Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, Liběchov, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Altmanová, Marie $u Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, Liběchov, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pelikánová, Šárka $u Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, Liběchov, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ráb, Petr $u Laboratory of Fish Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Rumburská 89, Liběchov, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 13, č. 3 (2018), s. e0195054
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29590207 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181010125945 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1340850 $s 1030208
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 13 $c 3 $d e0195054 $e 20180328 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...