Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

And What About Siblings? A Longitudinal Analysis of Sibling Effects on Youth's Intergroup Attitudes

K. Eckstein, J. Šerek, P. Noack,

. 2018 ; 47 (2) : 383-397. [pub] 20170713

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2009-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Family Health Database (ProQuest) from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest) from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 1992-02-01 to 1 year ago

Within the process of political socialization, the family is of particular importance. Apart from parents, however, little is known about the role of other close family members. The present study examined if siblings affect each other's intergroup attitudes (i.e., intolerance towards immigrants, social dominance orientation). Drawing on a sample of 362 sibling dyads (older siblings: M age = 17.77, 53.6% female; younger siblings: M age = 13.61, 61.3% female), the results showed that older siblings' intergroup attitudes predicted younger siblings' attitudes, but this effect was moderated by gender. Specifically, older siblings' intolerance and social dominance orientation were only found to affect their younger sisters, yet not their younger brothers. Although younger siblings' intergroup attitudes had no main effect on older siblings, a significant moderation by age indicated that younger siblings affected older siblings' social dominance orientation with increasing age. These moderation effects of age and gender were not mediated by the quality of family relationships. The findings also remained the same when parental intergroup attitudes were taken into account. While siblings were generally identified as an important agent of political socialization in youth, the results also highlight the necessity to further examine the mechanism that either facilitate or hinder sibling effects.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033832
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181016112256.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10964-017-0713-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28707155
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Eckstein, Katharina $u Department of Educational Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstr. 27, 07743, Jena, Germany. katharina.eckstein@uni-jena.de.
245    10
$a And What About Siblings? A Longitudinal Analysis of Sibling Effects on Youth's Intergroup Attitudes / $c K. Eckstein, J. Šerek, P. Noack,
520    9_
$a Within the process of political socialization, the family is of particular importance. Apart from parents, however, little is known about the role of other close family members. The present study examined if siblings affect each other's intergroup attitudes (i.e., intolerance towards immigrants, social dominance orientation). Drawing on a sample of 362 sibling dyads (older siblings: M age = 17.77, 53.6% female; younger siblings: M age = 13.61, 61.3% female), the results showed that older siblings' intergroup attitudes predicted younger siblings' attitudes, but this effect was moderated by gender. Specifically, older siblings' intolerance and social dominance orientation were only found to affect their younger sisters, yet not their younger brothers. Although younger siblings' intergroup attitudes had no main effect on older siblings, a significant moderation by age indicated that younger siblings affected older siblings' social dominance orientation with increasing age. These moderation effects of age and gender were not mediated by the quality of family relationships. The findings also remained the same when parental intergroup attitudes were taken into account. While siblings were generally identified as an important agent of political socialization in youth, the results also highlight the necessity to further examine the mechanism that either facilitate or hinder sibling effects.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    12
$a postoj $7 D001290
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a longitudinální studie $7 D008137
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a politika $7 D011057
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
650    12
$a sourozenecké vztahy $7 D012801
650    _2
$a sourozenci $x psychologie $7 D035781
650    12
$a sociální dominance $7 D012930
650    12
$a sociální identifikace $7 D012933
650    12
$a socializace $7 D012951
650    _2
$a xenofobie $x psychologie $7 D065806
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Šerek, Jan $u Institute for Research on Children, Youth and Family, Masaryk University, Joštova 10, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Noack, Peter $u Department of Educational Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Humboldtstr. 27, 07743, Jena, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00005967 $t Journal of youth and adolescence $x 1573-6601 $g Roč. 47, č. 2 (2018), s. 383-397
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28707155 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181016112753 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1339611 $s 1030826
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 47 $c 2 $d 383-397 $e 20170713 $i 1573-6601 $m Journal of youth and adolescence $n J Youth Adolesc $x MED00005967
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...