Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Single-Step BLUP with Varying Genotyping Effort in Open-Pollinated Picea glauca

B. Ratcliffe, OG. El-Dien, EP. Cappa, I. Porth, J. Klápště, C. Chen, YA. El-Kassaby,

. 2017 ; 7 (3) : 935-942. [pub] 20170310

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Maximization of genetic gain in forest tree breeding programs is contingent on the accuracy of the predicted breeding values and precision of the estimated genetic parameters. We investigated the effect of the combined use of contemporary pedigree information and genomic relatedness estimates on the accuracy of predicted breeding values and precision of estimated genetic parameters, as well as rankings of selection candidates, using single-step genomic evaluation (HBLUP). In this study, two traits with diverse heritabilities [tree height (HT) and wood density (WD)] were assessed at various levels of family genotyping efforts (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) from a population of white spruce (Picea glauca) consisting of 1694 trees from 214 open-pollinated families, representing 43 provenances in Québec, Canada. The results revealed that HBLUP bivariate analysis is effective in reducing the known bias in heritability estimates of open-pollinated populations, as it exposes hidden relatedness, potential pedigree errors, and inbreeding. The addition of genomic information in the analysis considerably improved the accuracy in breeding value estimates by accounting for both Mendelian sampling and historical coancestry that were not captured by the contemporary pedigree alone. Increasing family genotyping efforts were associated with continuous improvement in model fit, precision of genetic parameters, and breeding value accuracy. Yet, improvements were observed even at minimal genotyping effort, indicating that even modest genotyping effort is effective in improving genetic evaluation. The combined utilization of both pedigree and genomic information may be a cost-effective approach to increase the accuracy of breeding values in forest tree breeding programs where shallow pedigrees and large testing populations are the norm.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18034014
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181026105253.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1534/g3.116.037895 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28122953
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Ratcliffe, Blaise $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
245    10
$a Single-Step BLUP with Varying Genotyping Effort in Open-Pollinated Picea glauca / $c B. Ratcliffe, OG. El-Dien, EP. Cappa, I. Porth, J. Klápště, C. Chen, YA. El-Kassaby,
520    9_
$a Maximization of genetic gain in forest tree breeding programs is contingent on the accuracy of the predicted breeding values and precision of the estimated genetic parameters. We investigated the effect of the combined use of contemporary pedigree information and genomic relatedness estimates on the accuracy of predicted breeding values and precision of estimated genetic parameters, as well as rankings of selection candidates, using single-step genomic evaluation (HBLUP). In this study, two traits with diverse heritabilities [tree height (HT) and wood density (WD)] were assessed at various levels of family genotyping efforts (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) from a population of white spruce (Picea glauca) consisting of 1694 trees from 214 open-pollinated families, representing 43 provenances in Québec, Canada. The results revealed that HBLUP bivariate analysis is effective in reducing the known bias in heritability estimates of open-pollinated populations, as it exposes hidden relatedness, potential pedigree errors, and inbreeding. The addition of genomic information in the analysis considerably improved the accuracy in breeding value estimates by accounting for both Mendelian sampling and historical coancestry that were not captured by the contemporary pedigree alone. Increasing family genotyping efforts were associated with continuous improvement in model fit, precision of genetic parameters, and breeding value accuracy. Yet, improvements were observed even at minimal genotyping effort, indicating that even modest genotyping effort is effective in improving genetic evaluation. The combined utilization of both pedigree and genomic information may be a cost-effective approach to increase the accuracy of breeding values in forest tree breeding programs where shallow pedigrees and large testing populations are the norm.
650    _2
$a chov $7 D001947
650    _2
$a genetické markery $7 D005819
650    _2
$a genotypizační techniky $x metody $7 D060005
650    _2
$a rodokmen $7 D010375
650    _2
$a smrk $x genetika $7 D028222
650    _2
$a opylení $x genetika $7 D054817
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. $7 D013486
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a El-Dien, Omnia Gamal $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada. Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt.
700    1_
$a Cappa, Eduardo P $u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Las Cabañas y De Los Reseros s/n, 1686 Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
700    1_
$a Porth, Ilga $u Départment des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Faculté de Foresterie, de Géographie et Géomatique, Université Laval Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
700    1_
$a Klápště, Jaroslav $u Department of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic. Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand.
700    1_
$a Chen, Charles $u Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-3035.
700    1_
$a El-Kassaby, Yousry A $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada y.el-kassaby@ubc.ca.
773    0_
$w MED00188068 $t G3 (Bethesda, Md.) $x 2160-1836 $g Roč. 7, č. 3 (2017), s. 935-942
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28122953 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181026105804 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1339690 $s 1031008
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 7 $c 3 $d 935-942 $e 20170310 $i 2160-1836 $m G3 $n G3 (Bethesda) $x MED00188068
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...