-
Something wrong with this record ?
Single-Step BLUP with Varying Genotyping Effort in Open-Pollinated Picea glauca
B. Ratcliffe, OG. El-Dien, EP. Cappa, I. Porth, J. Klápště, C. Chen, YA. El-Kassaby,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S., Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2011
Free Medical Journals
from 2011
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 2011-06-01 to 2020
PubMed Central
from 2011
Europe PubMed Central
from 2011
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
from 2011-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2011
PubMed
28122953
DOI
10.1534/g3.116.037895
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Breeding MeSH
- Genetic Markers MeSH
- Genotyping Techniques methods MeSH
- Pollination genetics MeSH
- Pedigree MeSH
- Picea genetics MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
Maximization of genetic gain in forest tree breeding programs is contingent on the accuracy of the predicted breeding values and precision of the estimated genetic parameters. We investigated the effect of the combined use of contemporary pedigree information and genomic relatedness estimates on the accuracy of predicted breeding values and precision of estimated genetic parameters, as well as rankings of selection candidates, using single-step genomic evaluation (HBLUP). In this study, two traits with diverse heritabilities [tree height (HT) and wood density (WD)] were assessed at various levels of family genotyping efforts (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) from a population of white spruce (Picea glauca) consisting of 1694 trees from 214 open-pollinated families, representing 43 provenances in Québec, Canada. The results revealed that HBLUP bivariate analysis is effective in reducing the known bias in heritability estimates of open-pollinated populations, as it exposes hidden relatedness, potential pedigree errors, and inbreeding. The addition of genomic information in the analysis considerably improved the accuracy in breeding value estimates by accounting for both Mendelian sampling and historical coancestry that were not captured by the contemporary pedigree alone. Increasing family genotyping efforts were associated with continuous improvement in model fit, precision of genetic parameters, and breeding value accuracy. Yet, improvements were observed even at minimal genotyping effort, indicating that even modest genotyping effort is effective in improving genetic evaluation. The combined utilization of both pedigree and genomic information may be a cost-effective approach to increase the accuracy of breeding values in forest tree breeding programs where shallow pedigrees and large testing populations are the norm.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18034014
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181026105253.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181008s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1534/g3.116.037895 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28122953
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Ratcliffe, Blaise $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
- 245 10
- $a Single-Step BLUP with Varying Genotyping Effort in Open-Pollinated Picea glauca / $c B. Ratcliffe, OG. El-Dien, EP. Cappa, I. Porth, J. Klápště, C. Chen, YA. El-Kassaby,
- 520 9_
- $a Maximization of genetic gain in forest tree breeding programs is contingent on the accuracy of the predicted breeding values and precision of the estimated genetic parameters. We investigated the effect of the combined use of contemporary pedigree information and genomic relatedness estimates on the accuracy of predicted breeding values and precision of estimated genetic parameters, as well as rankings of selection candidates, using single-step genomic evaluation (HBLUP). In this study, two traits with diverse heritabilities [tree height (HT) and wood density (WD)] were assessed at various levels of family genotyping efforts (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) from a population of white spruce (Picea glauca) consisting of 1694 trees from 214 open-pollinated families, representing 43 provenances in Québec, Canada. The results revealed that HBLUP bivariate analysis is effective in reducing the known bias in heritability estimates of open-pollinated populations, as it exposes hidden relatedness, potential pedigree errors, and inbreeding. The addition of genomic information in the analysis considerably improved the accuracy in breeding value estimates by accounting for both Mendelian sampling and historical coancestry that were not captured by the contemporary pedigree alone. Increasing family genotyping efforts were associated with continuous improvement in model fit, precision of genetic parameters, and breeding value accuracy. Yet, improvements were observed even at minimal genotyping effort, indicating that even modest genotyping effort is effective in improving genetic evaluation. The combined utilization of both pedigree and genomic information may be a cost-effective approach to increase the accuracy of breeding values in forest tree breeding programs where shallow pedigrees and large testing populations are the norm.
- 650 _2
- $a chov $7 D001947
- 650 _2
- $a genetické markery $7 D005819
- 650 _2
- $a genotypizační techniky $x metody $7 D060005
- 650 _2
- $a rodokmen $7 D010375
- 650 _2
- $a smrk $x genetika $7 D028222
- 650 _2
- $a opylení $x genetika $7 D054817
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. $7 D013486
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a El-Dien, Omnia Gamal $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada. Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21521, Egypt.
- 700 1_
- $a Cappa, Eduardo P $u Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Instituto de Recursos Biológicos, Las Cabañas y De Los Reseros s/n, 1686 Hurlingham, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- 700 1_
- $a Porth, Ilga $u Départment des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt, Faculté de Foresterie, de Géographie et Géomatique, Université Laval Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Klápště, Jaroslav $u Department of Genetics and Physiology of Forest Trees, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic. Scion (New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd.), Whakarewarewa, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand.
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Charles $u Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078-3035.
- 700 1_
- $a El-Kassaby, Yousry A $u Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada y.el-kassaby@ubc.ca.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00188068 $t G3 (Bethesda, Md.) $x 2160-1836 $g Roč. 7, č. 3 (2017), s. 935-942
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28122953 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181026105804 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1339690 $s 1031008
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 7 $c 3 $d 935-942 $e 20170310 $i 2160-1836 $m G3 $n G3 (Bethesda) $x MED00188068
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20181008