-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Performing and interpreting individual pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with Hemophilia A or B: Rationale and general considerations
A. Iorio, AN. Edginton, V. Blanchette, J. Blatny, A. Boban, M. Cnossen, P. Collins, SE. Croteau, K. Fischer, DP. Hart, S. Ito, J. Korth-Bradley, S. Lethagen, D. Lillicrap, M. Makris, R. Mathôt, M. Morfini, EJ. Neufeld, J. Spears,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2017
PubMed Central
od 2017
Europe PubMed Central
od 2017
ProQuest Central
od 2017-07-01 do 2022-11-30
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2017-07-01 do 2022-11-30
Elsevier Open Access Journals
od 2017-07-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2017
PubMed
30046759
DOI
10.1002/rth2.12106
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
Objectives: In a separate document, we have provided specific guidance on performing individual pharmacokinetic (PK) studies using limited samples in persons with hemophilia with the goal to optimize prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates. This paper, intended for clinicians, aims to describe how to interpret and apply PK properties obtained in persons with hemophilia. Methods: The members of the Working Party on population PK (PopPK) of the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Factor VIII and IX and rare bleeding disorders, together with additional hemophilia and PK experts, completed a survey and ranking exercise whereby key areas of interest in the field were identified. The group had regular web conferences to refine the manuscript's scope and structure, taking into account comments from the external feedback to the earlier document. Results: Many clinical decisions in hemophilia are based on some form of explicit or implicit PK assessment. Individual patient PK profiles can be analyzed through traditional or PopPK methods, with the latter providing the advantage of fewer samples needing to be collected on any prophylaxis regimen, and without the need the for a washout period. The most useful presentation of PK results for clinical decision making are a curve of the factor activity level over time, the time to achieve a certain activity level, or related parameters like half-life or exposure (AUC). Software platforms have been developed to deliver this information to clinicians at the point of care. Key characteristics of studies measuring average PK parameters were reviewed, outlining what makes a credible head-to-head comparison among different concentrates. Large data collections of PK and treatment outcomes currently ongoing will advance care in the future. Conclusions: Traditionally used to compare different concentrates, PK can support tailoring of hemophilia treatment by individual profiling, which is greatly simplified by adopting a PopPK/Bayesian method and limited sampling protocol.
Boston Hemophilia Center Boston Children's Hospital Boston MA USA
Department of Infection Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
Department of Internal Medicine University Hospital Center Zagreb Croatia
Department of Paediatric Haematology University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic
Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine Queen's University Kingston ON Canada
Hospital Pharmacy Clinical Pharmacology Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands
Italian Association Haemophilia Centers Milan Italy
School of Pharmacy University of Waterloo Waterloo ON Canada
St Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis TN USA
University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada
Van Creveldkliniek University Medical Center Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18034350
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210208141145.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181008s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/rth2.12106 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30046759
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Iorio, Alfonso $u Department of Health Research, Methods, Evidence and Impact McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada. Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada.
- 245 10
- $a Performing and interpreting individual pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with Hemophilia A or B: Rationale and general considerations / $c A. Iorio, AN. Edginton, V. Blanchette, J. Blatny, A. Boban, M. Cnossen, P. Collins, SE. Croteau, K. Fischer, DP. Hart, S. Ito, J. Korth-Bradley, S. Lethagen, D. Lillicrap, M. Makris, R. Mathôt, M. Morfini, EJ. Neufeld, J. Spears,
- 520 9_
- $a Objectives: In a separate document, we have provided specific guidance on performing individual pharmacokinetic (PK) studies using limited samples in persons with hemophilia with the goal to optimize prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates. This paper, intended for clinicians, aims to describe how to interpret and apply PK properties obtained in persons with hemophilia. Methods: The members of the Working Party on population PK (PopPK) of the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Factor VIII and IX and rare bleeding disorders, together with additional hemophilia and PK experts, completed a survey and ranking exercise whereby key areas of interest in the field were identified. The group had regular web conferences to refine the manuscript's scope and structure, taking into account comments from the external feedback to the earlier document. Results: Many clinical decisions in hemophilia are based on some form of explicit or implicit PK assessment. Individual patient PK profiles can be analyzed through traditional or PopPK methods, with the latter providing the advantage of fewer samples needing to be collected on any prophylaxis regimen, and without the need the for a washout period. The most useful presentation of PK results for clinical decision making are a curve of the factor activity level over time, the time to achieve a certain activity level, or related parameters like half-life or exposure (AUC). Software platforms have been developed to deliver this information to clinicians at the point of care. Key characteristics of studies measuring average PK parameters were reviewed, outlining what makes a credible head-to-head comparison among different concentrates. Large data collections of PK and treatment outcomes currently ongoing will advance care in the future. Conclusions: Traditionally used to compare different concentrates, PK can support tailoring of hemophilia treatment by individual profiling, which is greatly simplified by adopting a PopPK/Bayesian method and limited sampling protocol.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Edginton, Andrea N $u School of Pharmacy University of Waterloo Waterloo ON Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Blanchette, Victor $u Division of Hematology/Oncology Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Pediatrics University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Blatny, Jan $u Department of Paediatric Haematology University Hospital Brno Brno Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Boban, Ana $u Department of Internal Medicine University Hospital Center Zagreb Croatia.
- 700 1_
- $a Cnossen, Marjon $u Department of Pediatric Hematology Erasmus University Medical Center Sophia Children's Hospital Rotterdam The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Collins, Peter $u Arthur Bloom Haemophilia Centre School of Medicine University Hospital of Wales Cardiff University Cardiff UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Croteau, Stacy E $u Boston Hemophilia Center Boston Children's Hospital Boston MA USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Fischer, Katheljin $u Van Creveldkliniek University Medical Center Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Hart, Daniel P $u The Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Centre, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry London UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Ito, Shinya $u University of Toronto Toronto ON Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Korth-Bradley, Joan $u Pfizer Collegeville PA USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Lethagen, Stefan $u Sobi Stockholm Sweden.
- 700 1_
- $a Lillicrap, David $u Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine Queen's University Kingston ON Canada.
- 700 1_
- $a Makris, Mike $u Department of Infection, Immunity& Cardiovascular Disease University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Mathôt, Ron $u Hospital Pharmacy-Clinical Pharmacology Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Morfini, Massimo $u Italian Association Haemophilia Centers Milan Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Neufeld, Ellis J $u St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Memphis TN USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Spears, Jeffrey $u Grifols Durham NC USA.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00196806 $t Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis $x 2475-0379 $g Roč. 2, č. 3 (2018), s. 535-548
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30046759 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210208141144 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1341162 $s 1031344
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 2 $c 3 $d 535-548 $e 20180520 $i 2475-0379 $m Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis $n Res Pract Thromb Haemost $x MED00196806
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20181008