-
Something wrong with this record ?
Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: Energy and carbon emission footprint
YV. Fan, JJ. Klemeš, CT. Lee, S. Perry,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Review
- MeSH
- Anaerobiosis MeSH
- Refuse Disposal * MeSH
- Solid Waste * MeSH
- Carbon MeSH
- Carbon Footprint * MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Anaerobic digestion (AD) serves as a promising alternative for waste treatment and a potential solution to improve the energy supply security. The feasibility of AD has been proven in some of the technologically and agriculturally advanced countries. However, development is still needed for worldwide implementation, especially for AD process dealing with municipal solid waste (MSW). This paper reviews various approaches and stages in the AD of MSW, which used to optimise the biogas production and quality. The assessed stages include pre-treatment, digestion process, post-treatment as well as the waste collection and transportation. The latest approaches and integrated system to improve the AD process are also presented. The stages were assessed in a relatively quantitative manner. The range of energy requirement, carbon emission footprint and the percentage of enhancement are summarised. Thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment is identified to be less suitable for MSW (-5% to +15.4% enhancement), unless conducted in the two-phase AD system. Microwave pre-treatment shows consistent performance in elevating the biogas production of MSW, but the energy consumption (114.24-8,040 kWeh t-1) and carbon emission footprint (59.93-4,217.78 kg CO2 t-1 waste) are relatively high. Chemical (∼0.43 kWeh m-3) and membrane-based (∼0.45 kWeh m-3) post-treatments are suggested to be a lower energy consumption approach for upgrading the biogas. The feasibility in terms of cost (scale up) and other environmental impacts (non-CO2 footprint) needs to be further assessed. This study provides an overview to facilitate further development and extended implementation of AD.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19000570
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190111145214.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190107s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.005 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29996113
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Fan, Yee Van $u Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: fan@fme.vutbr.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: Energy and carbon emission footprint / $c YV. Fan, JJ. Klemeš, CT. Lee, S. Perry,
- 520 9_
- $a Anaerobic digestion (AD) serves as a promising alternative for waste treatment and a potential solution to improve the energy supply security. The feasibility of AD has been proven in some of the technologically and agriculturally advanced countries. However, development is still needed for worldwide implementation, especially for AD process dealing with municipal solid waste (MSW). This paper reviews various approaches and stages in the AD of MSW, which used to optimise the biogas production and quality. The assessed stages include pre-treatment, digestion process, post-treatment as well as the waste collection and transportation. The latest approaches and integrated system to improve the AD process are also presented. The stages were assessed in a relatively quantitative manner. The range of energy requirement, carbon emission footprint and the percentage of enhancement are summarised. Thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment is identified to be less suitable for MSW (-5% to +15.4% enhancement), unless conducted in the two-phase AD system. Microwave pre-treatment shows consistent performance in elevating the biogas production of MSW, but the energy consumption (114.24-8,040 kWeh t-1) and carbon emission footprint (59.93-4,217.78 kg CO2 t-1 waste) are relatively high. Chemical (∼0.43 kWeh m-3) and membrane-based (∼0.45 kWeh m-3) post-treatments are suggested to be a lower energy consumption approach for upgrading the biogas. The feasibility in terms of cost (scale up) and other environmental impacts (non-CO2 footprint) needs to be further assessed. This study provides an overview to facilitate further development and extended implementation of AD.
- 650 _2
- $a anaerobióza $7 D000693
- 650 _2
- $a uhlík $7 D002244
- 650 12
- $a uhlíková stopa $7 D058572
- 650 12
- $a odpadky - odstraňování $7 D012037
- 650 12
- $a tuhý odpad $7 D062611
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír $u Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Lee, Chew Tin $u Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
- 700 1_
- $a Perry, Simon $u Centre for Process Integration, School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002657 $t Journal of environmental management $x 1095-8630 $g Roč. 223, č. - (2018), s. 888-897
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29996113 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190111145419 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1364625 $s 1038693
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 223 $c - $d 888-897 $e 20180708 $i 1095-8630 $m Journal of environmental management $n J Environ Manage $x MED00002657
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190107