-
Something wrong with this record ?
In vivo knee rotational stability 2 years after double-bundle and anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction
M. Komzák, R. Hart, M. Feranec, P. Šmíd, R. Kocová,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Knee Joint physiopathology surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Joint Instability physiopathology surgery MeSH
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries physiopathology surgery MeSH
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction * MeSH
- Rotation MeSH
- Range of Motion, Articular physiology MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate knee rotational stability at least 2 years after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (SB) and double-bundle ACL reconstruction (DB) in comparison with the contralateral healthy knee joint. The Cincinnati, Lysholm and IKDC scores were analysed too. METHODS: There were 40 patients in both groups, the mean follow-up was 27 months. For all measurements, the navigation system OrthoPilot was used. Measurement started with the patient in the standing position in neutral rotation. Then, the patient achieved in 30° knee flexion under weight-bearing maximal external trunk rotation and returned to the neutral position. The same measurement was done for the internal trunk rotation. For the anterior-posterior stability, KT-1000 arthrometer was used. All measurements were repeated three times for each knee joint. RESULTS: After the DB reconstruction, the mean external rotation of the tibia (ER) was 8.2° and the internal rotation (IR) was 10.2°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, ER was 8.5° (p = 0.597) and IR was 12.1° (p = 0.064). After the SB reconstruction, ER was 9.4° and IR was 13.1°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, ER was 7.7° (p = 0.066) and IR was 9.8° (p = 0.005). Anterior-posterior translation was to the same extent for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The DB reconstruction of the ACL restores the rotational stability of the knee joint without any significant difference in comparison to the contralateral healthy knee (p > 0.05). The main finding of this study is that the internal rotational stability of the knee joint after the anatomic SB technique is not sufficient.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19001307
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190118113900.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190107s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00068-017-0769-7 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28255611
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Komzák, Martin $7 xx0231327 $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic. m.komzak@seznam.cz.
- 245 10
- $a In vivo knee rotational stability 2 years after double-bundle and anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction / $c M. Komzák, R. Hart, M. Feranec, P. Šmíd, R. Kocová,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate knee rotational stability at least 2 years after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (SB) and double-bundle ACL reconstruction (DB) in comparison with the contralateral healthy knee joint. The Cincinnati, Lysholm and IKDC scores were analysed too. METHODS: There were 40 patients in both groups, the mean follow-up was 27 months. For all measurements, the navigation system OrthoPilot was used. Measurement started with the patient in the standing position in neutral rotation. Then, the patient achieved in 30° knee flexion under weight-bearing maximal external trunk rotation and returned to the neutral position. The same measurement was done for the internal trunk rotation. For the anterior-posterior stability, KT-1000 arthrometer was used. All measurements were repeated three times for each knee joint. RESULTS: After the DB reconstruction, the mean external rotation of the tibia (ER) was 8.2° and the internal rotation (IR) was 10.2°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, ER was 8.5° (p = 0.597) and IR was 12.1° (p = 0.064). After the SB reconstruction, ER was 9.4° and IR was 13.1°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, ER was 7.7° (p = 0.066) and IR was 9.8° (p = 0.005). Anterior-posterior translation was to the same extent for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The DB reconstruction of the ACL restores the rotational stability of the knee joint without any significant difference in comparison to the contralateral healthy knee (p > 0.05). The main finding of this study is that the internal rotational stability of the knee joint after the anatomic SB technique is not sufficient.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a poranění předního zkříženého vazu $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D000070598
- 650 12
- $a rekonstrukce předního zkříženého vazu $7 D059549
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a nestabilita kloubu $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D007593
- 650 _2
- $a kolenní kloub $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D007719
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a rozsah kloubních pohybů $x fyziologie $7 D016059
- 650 _2
- $a rotace $7 D012399
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hart, R $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Feranec, M $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Šmíd, P $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kocová, R $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00157536 $t European journal of trauma and emergency surgery official publication of the European Trauma Society $x 1863-9941 $g Roč. 44, č. 1 (2018), s. 105-111
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28255611 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190118114115 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1365191 $s 1039430
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 44 $c 1 $d 105-111 $e 20170302 $i 1863-9941 $m European journal of trauma and emergency surgery $n Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg $x MED00157536
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190107