• Something wrong with this record ?

In vivo knee rotational stability 2 years after double-bundle and anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction

M. Komzák, R. Hart, M. Feranec, P. Šmíd, R. Kocová,

. 2018 ; 44 (1) : 105-111. [pub] 20170302

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost) from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate knee rotational stability at least 2 years after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (SB) and double-bundle ACL reconstruction (DB) in comparison with the contralateral healthy knee joint. The Cincinnati, Lysholm and IKDC scores were analysed too. METHODS: There were 40 patients in both groups, the mean follow-up was 27 months. For all measurements, the navigation system OrthoPilot was used. Measurement started with the patient in the standing position in neutral rotation. Then, the patient achieved in 30° knee flexion under weight-bearing maximal external trunk rotation and returned to the neutral position. The same measurement was done for the internal trunk rotation. For the anterior-posterior stability, KT-1000 arthrometer was used. All measurements were repeated three times for each knee joint. RESULTS: After the DB reconstruction, the mean external rotation of the tibia (ER) was 8.2° and the internal rotation (IR) was 10.2°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, ER was 8.5° (p = 0.597) and IR was 12.1° (p = 0.064). After the SB reconstruction, ER was 9.4° and IR was 13.1°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, ER was 7.7° (p = 0.066) and IR was 9.8° (p = 0.005). Anterior-posterior translation was to the same extent for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The DB reconstruction of the ACL restores the rotational stability of the knee joint without any significant difference in comparison to the contralateral healthy knee (p > 0.05). The main finding of this study is that the internal rotational stability of the knee joint after the anatomic SB technique is not sufficient.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19001307
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190118113900.0
007      
ta
008      
190107s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00068-017-0769-7 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28255611
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Komzák, Martin $7 xx0231327 $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic. m.komzak@seznam.cz.
245    10
$a In vivo knee rotational stability 2 years after double-bundle and anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction / $c M. Komzák, R. Hart, M. Feranec, P. Šmíd, R. Kocová,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate knee rotational stability at least 2 years after anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (SB) and double-bundle ACL reconstruction (DB) in comparison with the contralateral healthy knee joint. The Cincinnati, Lysholm and IKDC scores were analysed too. METHODS: There were 40 patients in both groups, the mean follow-up was 27 months. For all measurements, the navigation system OrthoPilot was used. Measurement started with the patient in the standing position in neutral rotation. Then, the patient achieved in 30° knee flexion under weight-bearing maximal external trunk rotation and returned to the neutral position. The same measurement was done for the internal trunk rotation. For the anterior-posterior stability, KT-1000 arthrometer was used. All measurements were repeated three times for each knee joint. RESULTS: After the DB reconstruction, the mean external rotation of the tibia (ER) was 8.2° and the internal rotation (IR) was 10.2°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, ER was 8.5° (p = 0.597) and IR was 12.1° (p = 0.064). After the SB reconstruction, ER was 9.4° and IR was 13.1°. In the contralateral healthy knee joint, ER was 7.7° (p = 0.066) and IR was 9.8° (p = 0.005). Anterior-posterior translation was to the same extent for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The DB reconstruction of the ACL restores the rotational stability of the knee joint without any significant difference in comparison to the contralateral healthy knee (p > 0.05). The main finding of this study is that the internal rotational stability of the knee joint after the anatomic SB technique is not sufficient.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a poranění předního zkříženého vazu $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D000070598
650    12
$a rekonstrukce předního zkříženého vazu $7 D059549
650    _2
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a nestabilita kloubu $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D007593
650    _2
$a kolenní kloub $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D007719
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a rozsah kloubních pohybů $x fyziologie $7 D016059
650    _2
$a rotace $7 D012399
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hart, R $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Feranec, M $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šmíd, P $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kocová, R $u , MUDr.Jana Jánského 11, 669 02, Znojmo, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00157536 $t European journal of trauma and emergency surgery official publication of the European Trauma Society $x 1863-9941 $g Roč. 44, č. 1 (2018), s. 105-111
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28255611 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190118114115 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1365191 $s 1039430
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 44 $c 1 $d 105-111 $e 20170302 $i 1863-9941 $m European journal of trauma and emergency surgery $n Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg $x MED00157536
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190107

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...