-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Osteosyntéza klíční kosti – přehled komplikací a příčiny selhání
[Osteosynthesis of clavicle fractures - an overview of complications and causes of failure]
J. März, Z. Klézl
Jazyk čeština Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
30257753
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- fraktury kostí chirurgie MeSH
- hojení fraktur MeSH
- intramedulární fixace fraktury škodlivé účinky metody MeSH
- klíční kost * zranění chirurgie MeSH
- kostní destičky * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- obnova funkce MeSH
- pooperační komplikace * klasifikace diagnóza etiologie chirurgie MeSH
- reoperace * metody statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rozsah kloubních pohybů MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- vnitřní fixace fraktury * škodlivé účinky přístrojové vybavení metody MeSH
- výběr pacientů MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aimed to find out whether the higher rate of complications described in literature in the case of plate and intramedullary osteosynthesis of clavicle fractures is high enough to discredit one of these methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the period from July 2007 to March 2016, a total of 151 osteosyntheses of diaphyseal clavicle fractures were performed in 149 patients (106 men, 43 women). The plate as well as intramedullary techniques were used in this group of patients. The follow-up of 12 months was completed in 125 patients (91 men, 34 women). The age of patients ranged from 15 to 74 years. The postoperative rehabilitation with no load applied started immediately by elevating the arm up to 90 ° abduction for 3 weeks, which was followed by full range of motion exercises. The load was set based on the radiological finding. The number of complications, including the failure of osteosynthesis, was assessed. RESULTS Some kind of a whole range of complications (postoperative discomfort, infection, failure of osteosynthesis, non-union) occurred in 37 patients (29.6%), with osteosynthesis failing in six of them (4.8%), always within 6 months after the surgery. No later failure was reported. A statistically significant difference was observed only when comparing the patients discomfort for individual surgical techniques, with poorer results in case of intramedullary osteosynthesis. (p<0.001). DISCUSSION The dominance of "discomfort" in intramedullary fixation was caused by soft tissue irritation by the edge of material projecting thereto. Once it was removed, the results of both the methods in terms of the number of complications were comparable. In all the cases, either an incorrect indication of respective osteosynthesis techniques, or a technically poor surgical performance were identified as the likely causes of failure of the osteosynthesis. CONCLUSIONS The osteosynthesis always failed due to a wrong indication or technical errors in the execution of osteosynthesis. The intramedullary osteosynthesis is indicated in simple two-part fractures. The plate osteosynthesis can be applied to multiple fragment fractures. In preoperative planning, a suitable method shall be opted for based on the type of the fracture and the basic principles shall be adhered to during the surgery. Key words:clavicle fractures, surgical treatment, plate osteosynthesis, intramedullary osteosynthesis, osteosynthesis failure, non-union.
Osteosynthesis of clavicle fractures - an overview of complications and causes of failure
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19002878
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190205133742.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190116s2018 xr f 000 0|cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2018/042
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30257753
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a März, Josef $u Chirurgicko-traumatologické oddělení, Karlovarská krajská nemocnice, a.s., Karlovy Vary, ČR $7 xx0139202
- 245 10
- $a Osteosyntéza klíční kosti – přehled komplikací a příčiny selhání / $c J. März, Z. Klézl
- 246 31
- $a Osteosynthesis of clavicle fractures - an overview of complications and causes of failure
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aimed to find out whether the higher rate of complications described in literature in the case of plate and intramedullary osteosynthesis of clavicle fractures is high enough to discredit one of these methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS In the period from July 2007 to March 2016, a total of 151 osteosyntheses of diaphyseal clavicle fractures were performed in 149 patients (106 men, 43 women). The plate as well as intramedullary techniques were used in this group of patients. The follow-up of 12 months was completed in 125 patients (91 men, 34 women). The age of patients ranged from 15 to 74 years. The postoperative rehabilitation with no load applied started immediately by elevating the arm up to 90 ° abduction for 3 weeks, which was followed by full range of motion exercises. The load was set based on the radiological finding. The number of complications, including the failure of osteosynthesis, was assessed. RESULTS Some kind of a whole range of complications (postoperative discomfort, infection, failure of osteosynthesis, non-union) occurred in 37 patients (29.6%), with osteosynthesis failing in six of them (4.8%), always within 6 months after the surgery. No later failure was reported. A statistically significant difference was observed only when comparing the patients discomfort for individual surgical techniques, with poorer results in case of intramedullary osteosynthesis. (p<0.001). DISCUSSION The dominance of "discomfort" in intramedullary fixation was caused by soft tissue irritation by the edge of material projecting thereto. Once it was removed, the results of both the methods in terms of the number of complications were comparable. In all the cases, either an incorrect indication of respective osteosynthesis techniques, or a technically poor surgical performance were identified as the likely causes of failure of the osteosynthesis. CONCLUSIONS The osteosynthesis always failed due to a wrong indication or technical errors in the execution of osteosynthesis. The intramedullary osteosynthesis is indicated in simple two-part fractures. The plate osteosynthesis can be applied to multiple fragment fractures. In preoperative planning, a suitable method shall be opted for based on the type of the fracture and the basic principles shall be adhered to during the surgery. Key words:clavicle fractures, surgical treatment, plate osteosynthesis, intramedullary osteosynthesis, osteosynthesis failure, non-union.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a kostní destičky $7 D001860
- 650 12
- $a klíční kost $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D002968
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D005593
- 650 _2
- $a intramedulární fixace fraktury $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D005594
- 650 _2
- $a hojení fraktur $7 D017102
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury kostí $x chirurgie $7 D050723
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a výběr pacientů $7 D018579
- 650 12
- $a pooperační komplikace $x klasifikace $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x chirurgie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a rozsah kloubních pohybů $7 D016059
- 650 _2
- $a obnova funkce $7 D020127
- 650 12
- $a reoperace $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012086
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Klézl, Zdeněk $7 xx0081733 $u Royal Derbi Hospital, Derby, England, UK; Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika 3. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 85, č. 4 (2018), s. 245-248
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190116 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190204075442 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1373948 $s 1041036
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 85 $c 4 $d 245-248 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20190116