Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The comparison of results in C1 paddling functional test and in arm crank ergometrics in canoe slalom elite athletes

Jan Busta, Milan Bílý, Lenka Kovářová, Martin Říha

. 2018 ; 12 (2) : 18-25.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19008299

Background: Recently, there have been rising demands on the specifics of functional load testing, which should with its motor structure correspond or at least draw near the sport specialization. However, evaluation of specific forms of diagnostics is very pure in canoe slalom. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare a physiological response based on results in graded functional test when paddling in a single canoe (C1) and results reached in the standardized arm crank ergometrics. Methods: The research sample consisted of 6 elite Czech single canoeists, members of Czech senior national team and the Czech national team up to 23 years. Their average weight was 79.7±6.6 kg, height 183.4±6.6 cm and age 23.6±3.9 years. Results: When comparing the result values of physiological indicators measured in both functional tests, we have found out significant differences (statistical and substantive) in variables: VO2peak (p=0.00; 15.1%), VEpeak (p=0.06, 11.1%), HR (p=0.02; 5.7%), RR (p=0.18; 9.3%), VT (p=0.00; 18.8%) and RER (p=0.26; 4.0%). With the exception of respiratory rate, significantly lower values of all physiological variables were found in on-water testing (C1). Although there was a strong correlation between the VO2peak indicators (r=0.79, p=0.06) found between paddling and crank ergometrics, this relationship cannot be considered significant (p=0.06) due to the small research sample. Conclusions: To evaluate on-water testing and to determine the external validity of arm crank ergometrics for C1 diagnostics, it is necessary to test a bigger research sample. Therefore, it is a pilot study. However, the results indicate that the physiological load requirements in the C1 category are different from those of the kayak category (K1). Although C1 paddlers reached similar VO2peak values in the arm crank ergometrics as kayakers, in the on-water test they reached about 10 ml.kg.min-1 lower oxygen uptake compared to kayakers (Busta, Bílý, Suchý, & Kovářová, 2017).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

LIteratura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19008299
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210301131827.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
190305s2018 xr a fs 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    0_
$a 10.5817/StS2018-2-2 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Busta, Jan $7 jo20211100377 $u Faculty of physical education and sport, Charles University
245    14
$a The comparison of results in C1 paddling functional test and in arm crank ergometrics in canoe slalom elite athletes / $c Jan Busta, Milan Bílý, Lenka Kovářová, Martin Říha
504    __
$a LIteratura
520    9_
$a Background: Recently, there have been rising demands on the specifics of functional load testing, which should with its motor structure correspond or at least draw near the sport specialization. However, evaluation of specific forms of diagnostics is very pure in canoe slalom. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare a physiological response based on results in graded functional test when paddling in a single canoe (C1) and results reached in the standardized arm crank ergometrics. Methods: The research sample consisted of 6 elite Czech single canoeists, members of Czech senior national team and the Czech national team up to 23 years. Their average weight was 79.7±6.6 kg, height 183.4±6.6 cm and age 23.6±3.9 years. Results: When comparing the result values of physiological indicators measured in both functional tests, we have found out significant differences (statistical and substantive) in variables: VO2peak (p=0.00; 15.1%), VEpeak (p=0.06, 11.1%), HR (p=0.02; 5.7%), RR (p=0.18; 9.3%), VT (p=0.00; 18.8%) and RER (p=0.26; 4.0%). With the exception of respiratory rate, significantly lower values of all physiological variables were found in on-water testing (C1). Although there was a strong correlation between the VO2peak indicators (r=0.79, p=0.06) found between paddling and crank ergometrics, this relationship cannot be considered significant (p=0.06) due to the small research sample. Conclusions: To evaluate on-water testing and to determine the external validity of arm crank ergometrics for C1 diagnostics, it is necessary to test a bigger research sample. Therefore, it is a pilot study. However, the results indicate that the physiological load requirements in the C1 category are different from those of the kayak category (K1). Although C1 paddlers reached similar VO2peak values in the arm crank ergometrics as kayakers, in the on-water test they reached about 10 ml.kg.min-1 lower oxygen uptake compared to kayakers (Busta, Bílý, Suchý, & Kovářová, 2017).
650    12
$a sportovní výkon $7 D054874
650    _2
$a ergometrie $x metody $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D016552
650    _2
$a sporty $7 D013177
650    _2
$a vodní sporty $7 D000073678
650    _2
$a techniky cvičení a pohybu $x normy $7 D026241
653    10
$a kanoistika
700    1_
$a Bílý, Milan $7 jn20000400345 $u Faculty of physical education and sport, Charles University
700    1_
$a Kovářová, Lenka, $d 1979- $7 xx0145358 $u Faculty of physical education and sport, Charles University
700    1_
$a Říha, Martin $7 xx0233647 $u Faculty of physical education and sport, Charles University
773    0_
$t Studia sportiva $x 1802-7679 $g Roč. 12, č. 2 (2018), s. 18-25 $w MED00173478
856    41
$u https://journals.muni.cz/studiasportiva/ $y domovská stránka časopisu - plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20190305061116 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210227131821 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1381875 $s 1046555
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 12 $c 2 $d 18-25 $i 1802-7679 $m Studia Sportiva $x MED00173478
LZP    __
$c NLK197 $d 20210227 $a NLK 2019-03/vt

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...