• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Gender-associated differences in the prevalence of central obesity using waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio, and that of general obesity, in Slovak adults

M. Csongová, K. Volkovová, M. Gajdoš, R. Gurecká, I. Koborová, A. Líšková, K. Šebeková

. 2018 ; 26 (3) : 228-233.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19009658

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2004
ProQuest Central od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2006-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2009-03-01 do Před 6 měsíci
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources od 1993

OBJECTIVES: Central obesity represents an increased risk to develop cardiovascular diseases. Guidelines of international societies suggest estimating central obesity by measuring waist circumference (WC). Robust statistical data in literature provide evidence on the superiority of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) over WC and body mass index (BMI) for detecting cardiometabolic risk in both genders. Based on measurements of weight, height and waist circumference we compared the prevalence of central obesity using both the above mentioned criteria in the apparently healthy Slovak adults, and compared the prevalence of central obesity to that of general obesity (BMI). METHODS: Data collected from 5,184 individuals (45% males) aged ≥18 years in four cross-sectional studies carried out between the years 2009-2012 were subjected to secondary analysis. RESULTS: Waist circumference underestimated central obesity in males and overestimated in females: 37.3% of males and 41.8% of females presented central obesity according to WC, 54.2% males and 34.9% females according to WHtR. 17.3% of males centrally obese according to WC present WHtR < 0.5; while 7.8% of females centrally obese according to their WHtR do not display increased WC. The frequency of central obesity increased with age. According to BMI, the prevalence of overweight was 39% in males and 22% in females; that of obesity was 17% and 15%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of central obesity estimated using WC vs. WHtR differs significantly in Slovak adults. WHtR is considered superior for detection of the risk of future development of cardiovascular afflictions. Thus, further studies addressing the gender-associated discordance of central obesity measures are required to determine whether our results are consistent across geographical regions and ethnic groups.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19009658
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190320124352.0
007      
ta
008      
190318s2018 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21101/cejph.a4719 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30419627
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Csongová, Melinda $u Institute of Molecular Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic $7 xx0235064
245    10
$a Gender-associated differences in the prevalence of central obesity using waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio, and that of general obesity, in Slovak adults / $c M. Csongová, K. Volkovová, M. Gajdoš, R. Gurecká, I. Koborová, A. Líšková, K. Šebeková
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: Central obesity represents an increased risk to develop cardiovascular diseases. Guidelines of international societies suggest estimating central obesity by measuring waist circumference (WC). Robust statistical data in literature provide evidence on the superiority of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) over WC and body mass index (BMI) for detecting cardiometabolic risk in both genders. Based on measurements of weight, height and waist circumference we compared the prevalence of central obesity using both the above mentioned criteria in the apparently healthy Slovak adults, and compared the prevalence of central obesity to that of general obesity (BMI). METHODS: Data collected from 5,184 individuals (45% males) aged ≥18 years in four cross-sectional studies carried out between the years 2009-2012 were subjected to secondary analysis. RESULTS: Waist circumference underestimated central obesity in males and overestimated in females: 37.3% of males and 41.8% of females presented central obesity according to WC, 54.2% males and 34.9% females according to WHtR. 17.3% of males centrally obese according to WC present WHtR < 0.5; while 7.8% of females centrally obese according to their WHtR do not display increased WC. The frequency of central obesity increased with age. According to BMI, the prevalence of overweight was 39% in males and 22% in females; that of obesity was 17% and 15%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of central obesity estimated using WC vs. WHtR differs significantly in Slovak adults. WHtR is considered superior for detection of the risk of future development of cardiovascular afflictions. Thus, further studies addressing the gender-associated discordance of central obesity measures are required to determine whether our results are consistent across geographical regions and ethnic groups.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a antropometrie $7 D000886
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a obezita $x epidemiologie $7 D009765
650    _2
$a abdominální obezita $x epidemiologie $7 D056128
650    _2
$a prevalence $7 D015995
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
650    _2
$a obvod pasu $7 D055105
650    _2
$a poměr pas/výška $7 D065927
651    _2
$a Slovenská republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018154
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Volkovová, Katarína $u Institute of Biology, Medical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic $7 xx0235004
700    1_
$a Gajdoš, Martin $u Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacotherapy, Medical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic $7 xx0228673
700    1_
$a Gurecká, Radana $u Institute of Molecular Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic $7 xx0235067
700    1_
$a Koborová, Ivana $u Institute of Molecular Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic $7 xx0234994
700    1_
$a Líšková, Aurélia $u Department of Immunology and Immunotoxicology, Medical Faculty, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic $7 xx0077816
700    1_
$a Šebeková, Katarína, $u Institute of Molecular Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovak Republic $d 1955- $7 xx0080224
773    0_
$w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $x 1210-7778 $g Roč. 26, č. 3 (2018), s. 228-233
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30419627 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20190318 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190320102521 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1386371 $s 1047929
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 26 $c 3 $d 228-233 $i 1210-7778 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $n Cent. Eur. J. Public Health $x MED00001083
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20190318

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...