-
Something wrong with this record ?
Chloroplasts preferentially take up ferric-citrate over iron-nicotianamine complexes in Brassica napus
B. Müller, K. Kovács, HD. Pham, Y. Kavak, J. Pechoušek, L. Machala, R. Zbořil, K. Szenthe, J. Abadía, F. Fodor, Z. Klencsár, Á. Solti,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2002-11-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 1999-11-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2002-11-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Brassica napus metabolism MeSH
- Chloroplasts metabolism MeSH
- Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction MeSH
- Azetidinecarboxylic Acid analogs & derivatives metabolism MeSH
- Spectroscopy, Mossbauer MeSH
- Transcriptome MeSH
- Ferric Compounds metabolism MeSH
- Iron metabolism MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
MAIN CONCLUSION: Fe uptake machinery of chloroplasts prefers to utilise Fe(III)-citrate over Fe-nicotianamine complexes. Iron uptake in chloroplasts is a process of prime importance. Although a few members of their iron transport machinery were identified, the substrate preference of the system is still unknown. Intact chloroplasts of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) were purified and subjected to iron uptake studies using natural and artificial iron complexes. Fe-nicotianamine (NA) complexes were characterised by 5 K, 5 T Mössbauer spectrometry. Expression of components of the chloroplast Fe uptake machinery was also studied. Fe(III)-NA contained a minor paramagnetic Fe(II) component (ca. 9%), a paramagnetic Fe(III) component exhibiting dimeric or oligomeric structure (ca. 20%), and a Fe(III) complex, likely being a monomeric structure, which undergoes slow electronic relaxation at 5 K (ca. 61%). Fe(II)-NA contained more than one similar chemical Fe(II) environment with no sign of Fe(III) components. Chloroplasts preferred Fe(III)-citrate compared to Fe(III)-NA and Fe(II)-NA, but also to Fe(III)-EDTA and Fe(III)-o,o'EDDHA, and the Km value was lower for Fe(III)-citrate than for the Fe-NA complexes. Only the uptake of Fe(III)-citrate was light-dependent. Regarding the components of the chloroplast Fe uptake system, only genes of the reduction-based Fe uptake system showed high expression. Chloroplasts more effectively utilize Fe(III)-citrate, but hardly Fe-NA complexes in Fe uptake.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012197
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190416112353.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2019 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00425-018-3037-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30382344
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Müller, Brigitta $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
- 245 10
- $a Chloroplasts preferentially take up ferric-citrate over iron-nicotianamine complexes in Brassica napus / $c B. Müller, K. Kovács, HD. Pham, Y. Kavak, J. Pechoušek, L. Machala, R. Zbořil, K. Szenthe, J. Abadía, F. Fodor, Z. Klencsár, Á. Solti,
- 520 9_
- $a MAIN CONCLUSION: Fe uptake machinery of chloroplasts prefers to utilise Fe(III)-citrate over Fe-nicotianamine complexes. Iron uptake in chloroplasts is a process of prime importance. Although a few members of their iron transport machinery were identified, the substrate preference of the system is still unknown. Intact chloroplasts of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) were purified and subjected to iron uptake studies using natural and artificial iron complexes. Fe-nicotianamine (NA) complexes were characterised by 5 K, 5 T Mössbauer spectrometry. Expression of components of the chloroplast Fe uptake machinery was also studied. Fe(III)-NA contained a minor paramagnetic Fe(II) component (ca. 9%), a paramagnetic Fe(III) component exhibiting dimeric or oligomeric structure (ca. 20%), and a Fe(III) complex, likely being a monomeric structure, which undergoes slow electronic relaxation at 5 K (ca. 61%). Fe(II)-NA contained more than one similar chemical Fe(II) environment with no sign of Fe(III) components. Chloroplasts preferred Fe(III)-citrate compared to Fe(III)-NA and Fe(II)-NA, but also to Fe(III)-EDTA and Fe(III)-o,o'EDDHA, and the Km value was lower for Fe(III)-citrate than for the Fe-NA complexes. Only the uptake of Fe(III)-citrate was light-dependent. Regarding the components of the chloroplast Fe uptake system, only genes of the reduction-based Fe uptake system showed high expression. Chloroplasts more effectively utilize Fe(III)-citrate, but hardly Fe-NA complexes in Fe uptake.
- 650 _2
- $a kyselina azetidinkarboxylová $x analogy a deriváty $x metabolismus $7 D001383
- 650 _2
- $a Brassica napus $x metabolismus $7 D029688
- 650 _2
- $a chloroplasty $x metabolismus $7 D002736
- 650 _2
- $a železité sloučeniny $x metabolismus $7 D005290
- 650 _2
- $a železo $x metabolismus $7 D007501
- 650 _2
- $a kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D060888
- 650 _2
- $a spektroskopie Mossbauerova $7 D015204
- 650 _2
- $a transkriptom $7 D059467
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kovács, Krisztina $u Laboratory of Nuclear Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Pham, Hong-Diep $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Kavak, Yusuf $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Pechoušek, Jiři $u Departments of Experimental Physics and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Machala, Libor $u Departments of Experimental Physics and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zbořil, Radek $u Departments of Experimental Physics and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Szenthe, Kálmán $u RT-Europe Nonprofit Research Ltd., Vár tér 2, E Building, Mosonmagyaróvár, 9200, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Abadía, Javier $u Department of Plant Nutrition, Aula Dei Experimental Station, Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), P.O. Box 13034, 50080, Saragossa, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Fodor, Ferenc $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Klencsár, Zoltán $u Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Konkoly Thege Miklós út 29-33, Budapest, 1121, Hungary.
- 700 1_
- $a Solti, Ádám $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary. adam.solti@ttk.elte.hu.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005789 $t Planta $x 1432-2048 $g Roč. 249, č. 3 (2019), s. 751-763
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30382344 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190416112418 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391507 $s 1050502
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 249 $c 3 $d 751-763 $e 20181031 $i 1432-2048 $m Planta $n Planta $x MED00005789
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405