Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Chloroplasts preferentially take up ferric-citrate over iron-nicotianamine complexes in Brassica napus

B. Müller, K. Kovács, HD. Pham, Y. Kavak, J. Pechoušek, L. Machala, R. Zbořil, K. Szenthe, J. Abadía, F. Fodor, Z. Klencsár, Á. Solti,

. 2019 ; 249 (3) : 751-763. [pub] 20181031

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2002-11-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 1999-11-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2002-11-01 to 1 year ago

MAIN CONCLUSION: Fe uptake machinery of chloroplasts prefers to utilise Fe(III)-citrate over Fe-nicotianamine complexes. Iron uptake in chloroplasts is a process of prime importance. Although a few members of their iron transport machinery were identified, the substrate preference of the system is still unknown. Intact chloroplasts of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) were purified and subjected to iron uptake studies using natural and artificial iron complexes. Fe-nicotianamine (NA) complexes were characterised by 5 K, 5 T Mössbauer spectrometry. Expression of components of the chloroplast Fe uptake machinery was also studied. Fe(III)-NA contained a minor paramagnetic Fe(II) component (ca. 9%), a paramagnetic Fe(III) component exhibiting dimeric or oligomeric structure (ca. 20%), and a Fe(III) complex, likely being a monomeric structure, which undergoes slow electronic relaxation at 5 K (ca. 61%). Fe(II)-NA contained more than one similar chemical Fe(II) environment with no sign of Fe(III) components. Chloroplasts preferred Fe(III)-citrate compared to Fe(III)-NA and Fe(II)-NA, but also to Fe(III)-EDTA and Fe(III)-o,o'EDDHA, and the Km value was lower for Fe(III)-citrate than for the Fe-NA complexes. Only the uptake of Fe(III)-citrate was light-dependent. Regarding the components of the chloroplast Fe uptake system, only genes of the reduction-based Fe uptake system showed high expression. Chloroplasts more effectively utilize Fe(III)-citrate, but hardly Fe-NA complexes in Fe uptake.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012197
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190416112353.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2019 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00425-018-3037-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30382344
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Müller, Brigitta $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
245    10
$a Chloroplasts preferentially take up ferric-citrate over iron-nicotianamine complexes in Brassica napus / $c B. Müller, K. Kovács, HD. Pham, Y. Kavak, J. Pechoušek, L. Machala, R. Zbořil, K. Szenthe, J. Abadía, F. Fodor, Z. Klencsár, Á. Solti,
520    9_
$a MAIN CONCLUSION: Fe uptake machinery of chloroplasts prefers to utilise Fe(III)-citrate over Fe-nicotianamine complexes. Iron uptake in chloroplasts is a process of prime importance. Although a few members of their iron transport machinery were identified, the substrate preference of the system is still unknown. Intact chloroplasts of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) were purified and subjected to iron uptake studies using natural and artificial iron complexes. Fe-nicotianamine (NA) complexes were characterised by 5 K, 5 T Mössbauer spectrometry. Expression of components of the chloroplast Fe uptake machinery was also studied. Fe(III)-NA contained a minor paramagnetic Fe(II) component (ca. 9%), a paramagnetic Fe(III) component exhibiting dimeric or oligomeric structure (ca. 20%), and a Fe(III) complex, likely being a monomeric structure, which undergoes slow electronic relaxation at 5 K (ca. 61%). Fe(II)-NA contained more than one similar chemical Fe(II) environment with no sign of Fe(III) components. Chloroplasts preferred Fe(III)-citrate compared to Fe(III)-NA and Fe(II)-NA, but also to Fe(III)-EDTA and Fe(III)-o,o'EDDHA, and the Km value was lower for Fe(III)-citrate than for the Fe-NA complexes. Only the uptake of Fe(III)-citrate was light-dependent. Regarding the components of the chloroplast Fe uptake system, only genes of the reduction-based Fe uptake system showed high expression. Chloroplasts more effectively utilize Fe(III)-citrate, but hardly Fe-NA complexes in Fe uptake.
650    _2
$a kyselina azetidinkarboxylová $x analogy a deriváty $x metabolismus $7 D001383
650    _2
$a Brassica napus $x metabolismus $7 D029688
650    _2
$a chloroplasty $x metabolismus $7 D002736
650    _2
$a železité sloučeniny $x metabolismus $7 D005290
650    _2
$a železo $x metabolismus $7 D007501
650    _2
$a kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D060888
650    _2
$a spektroskopie Mossbauerova $7 D015204
650    _2
$a transkriptom $7 D059467
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kovács, Krisztina $u Laboratory of Nuclear Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/A, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Pham, Hong-Diep $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Kavak, Yusuf $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Pechoušek, Jiři $u Departments of Experimental Physics and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Machala, Libor $u Departments of Experimental Physics and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zbořil, Radek $u Departments of Experimental Physics and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Szenthe, Kálmán $u RT-Europe Nonprofit Research Ltd., Vár tér 2, E Building, Mosonmagyaróvár, 9200, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Abadía, Javier $u Department of Plant Nutrition, Aula Dei Experimental Station, Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC), P.O. Box 13034, 50080, Saragossa, Spain.
700    1_
$a Fodor, Ferenc $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Klencsár, Zoltán $u Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Konkoly Thege Miklós út 29-33, Budapest, 1121, Hungary.
700    1_
$a Solti, Ádám $u Department of Plant Physiology and Molecular Plant Biology, Institute of Biology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, 1117, Budapest, Hungary. adam.solti@ttk.elte.hu.
773    0_
$w MED00005789 $t Planta $x 1432-2048 $g Roč. 249, č. 3 (2019), s. 751-763
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30382344 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190416112418 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1391507 $s 1050502
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 249 $c 3 $d 751-763 $e 20181031 $i 1432-2048 $m Planta $n Planta $x MED00005789
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...