• This record comes from PubMed

Chloroplasts preferentially take up ferric-citrate over iron-nicotianamine complexes in Brassica napus

. 2019 Mar ; 249 (3) : 751-763. [epub] 20181031

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
VEKOP-2.3.3-15-2016-00008 Government of Hungary
PD-112047 National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary
PD-111979 National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary
K-124159 National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary
AGL2016-75226-R Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
LO1305 Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic
BO/00207/15/4 Magyar Tudományos Akadémia

Links

PubMed 30382344
DOI 10.1007/s00425-018-3037-0
PII: 10.1007/s00425-018-3037-0
Knihovny.cz E-resources

Fe uptake machinery of chloroplasts prefers to utilise Fe(III)-citrate over Fe-nicotianamine complexes. Iron uptake in chloroplasts is a process of prime importance. Although a few members of their iron transport machinery were identified, the substrate preference of the system is still unknown. Intact chloroplasts of oilseed rape (Brassica napus) were purified and subjected to iron uptake studies using natural and artificial iron complexes. Fe-nicotianamine (NA) complexes were characterised by 5 K, 5 T Mössbauer spectrometry. Expression of components of the chloroplast Fe uptake machinery was also studied. Fe(III)-NA contained a minor paramagnetic Fe(II) component (ca. 9%), a paramagnetic Fe(III) component exhibiting dimeric or oligomeric structure (ca. 20%), and a Fe(III) complex, likely being a monomeric structure, which undergoes slow electronic relaxation at 5 K (ca. 61%). Fe(II)-NA contained more than one similar chemical Fe(II) environment with no sign of Fe(III) components. Chloroplasts preferred Fe(III)-citrate compared to Fe(III)-NA and Fe(II)-NA, but also to Fe(III)-EDTA and Fe(III)-o,o'EDDHA, and the Km value was lower for Fe(III)-citrate than for the Fe-NA complexes. Only the uptake of Fe(III)-citrate was light-dependent. Regarding the components of the chloroplast Fe uptake system, only genes of the reduction-based Fe uptake system showed high expression. Chloroplasts more effectively utilize Fe(III)-citrate, but hardly Fe-NA complexes in Fe uptake.

See more in PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1999 Mar;119(3):1107-14 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 May 1;29(9):e45 PubMed

Planta. 2001 Oct;213(6):967-76 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2002 Mar;128(3):1022-30 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2002 Aug;129(4):1435-8 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1995 May;108(1):269-275 PubMed

FEBS Lett. 2003 Jan 30;535(1-3):159-65 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 21;103(12):4777-82 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1982 Jan;69(1):107-11 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2007 Mar;19(3):986-1006 PubMed

Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Jun;10(3):276-82 PubMed

Biometals. 2008 Oct;21(5):503-13 PubMed

Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2008 May;22(10):1553-62 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 29;105(30):10619-24 PubMed

Ann Bot. 2009 Jan;103(1):1-11 PubMed

Trends Plant Sci. 2009 May;14(5):280-5 PubMed

Ann Bot. 2010 May;105(5):811-22 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2009 Oct;151(2):559-73 PubMed

Plant Cell Physiol. 2010 Jan;51(1):91-102 PubMed

Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Jan;5(1):49-52 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2011 Apr;155(4):1709-22 PubMed

Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011 May;49(5):471-82 PubMed

Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012 Mar;52:91-7 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2012 Jun;24(6):2380-400 PubMed

Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013 Sep 20;19(9):919-32 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2013 Mar;25(3):1040-55 PubMed

Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:125-53 PubMed

New Phytol. 2014 May;202(3):920-8 PubMed

Front Plant Sci. 2014 Mar 21;5:100 PubMed

Front Plant Sci. 2014 Mar 25;5:105 PubMed

Trends Plant Sci. 2015 Jan;20(1):33-40 PubMed

Physiol Plant. 2015 May;154(1):82-94 PubMed

Planta. 2016 Jul;244(1):167-79 PubMed

Front Plant Sci. 2016 Feb 19;7:178 PubMed

New Phytol. 2016 Aug;211(3):1129-41 PubMed

Plant Biotechnol J. 2016 Dec;14(12):2228-2239 PubMed

Planta. 2016 Dec;244(6):1303-1313 PubMed

Front Plant Sci. 2016 Aug 05;7:1192 PubMed

Plant J. 2017 Mar;89(6):1184-1194 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2018 Jan;176(1):596-610 PubMed

Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680-5 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...