-
Something wrong with this record ?
Surgical treatment of "intermediate risk" lymph node negative cervical cancer patients without adjuvant radiotherapy-A retrospective cohort study and review of the literature
D. Cibula, NR. Abu-Rustum, D. Fischerova, S. Pather, K. Lavigne, J. Slama, K. Alektiar, L. Ming-Yin, R. Kocian, A. Germanova, F. Frühauf, L. Dostalek, L. Dusek, K. Narayan,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
Grant support
NV16-31643A
MZ0
CEP Register
- MeSH
- Radiotherapy, Adjuvant methods MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Lymph Nodes pathology MeSH
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms pathology surgery MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy for lymph node-negative stage IB patients with tumor-related negative prognostic factors is not uniformly accepted. It is advocated based on the GOG 92 trial, which was initiated in 1989. The aim of the current study is to report the oncological outcome of "intermediate risk" patients treated by tailored surgery without adjuvant radiotherapy. Data from two institutions that refer these patients for adjuvant radiotherapy served as a control group. METHODS: Included were patients with stage IB cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, who had negative pelvic lymph nodes but a combination of negative prognostic factors adopted from the GOG 92 trial. Data were obtained from prospectively collected databases of three institutions. Radical surgery was a single-treatment modality in one of them and in the remaining two institutes it was followed by adjuvant chemoradiation. RESULTS: In 127 patients who received only radical surgery, with a median follow-up of 6.1 years, the local recurrence rate was 1.6% (2 cases), and total recurrence was 6.3% (8 cases). Disease-specific survival at 5 years was 95.7% (91.9%; 99.4%) and 91% (83.7%; 98.3%) at 10 years. The only significant factor for disease-specific survival was tumor size ≥4 cm (P = 0.032). The recurrence rate, local control or overall survival did not differ from the control group. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not a significant prognostic factor within the whole cohort. CONCLUSIONS: An excellent oncological outcome, especially local control, can be achieved by both radical surgery or combined treatment in stage IB lymph node-negative cervical cancer patients with negative prognostic factors. The substantially better outcome than in the GOG 92 trial can be attributed to more accurate pre-operative and pathological staging and an improvement in surgical techniques.
Chris O'Brien Comprehensive Cancer Centre University of Sydney Sydney Australia
Institute for Biostatistics and Analyses Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012235
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190411132240.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.10.018 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30348519
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Cibula, David $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: dc@davidcibula.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Surgical treatment of "intermediate risk" lymph node negative cervical cancer patients without adjuvant radiotherapy-A retrospective cohort study and review of the literature / $c D. Cibula, NR. Abu-Rustum, D. Fischerova, S. Pather, K. Lavigne, J. Slama, K. Alektiar, L. Ming-Yin, R. Kocian, A. Germanova, F. Frühauf, L. Dostalek, L. Dusek, K. Narayan,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy for lymph node-negative stage IB patients with tumor-related negative prognostic factors is not uniformly accepted. It is advocated based on the GOG 92 trial, which was initiated in 1989. The aim of the current study is to report the oncological outcome of "intermediate risk" patients treated by tailored surgery without adjuvant radiotherapy. Data from two institutions that refer these patients for adjuvant radiotherapy served as a control group. METHODS: Included were patients with stage IB cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, who had negative pelvic lymph nodes but a combination of negative prognostic factors adopted from the GOG 92 trial. Data were obtained from prospectively collected databases of three institutions. Radical surgery was a single-treatment modality in one of them and in the remaining two institutes it was followed by adjuvant chemoradiation. RESULTS: In 127 patients who received only radical surgery, with a median follow-up of 6.1 years, the local recurrence rate was 1.6% (2 cases), and total recurrence was 6.3% (8 cases). Disease-specific survival at 5 years was 95.7% (91.9%; 99.4%) and 91% (83.7%; 98.3%) at 10 years. The only significant factor for disease-specific survival was tumor size ≥4 cm (P = 0.032). The recurrence rate, local control or overall survival did not differ from the control group. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not a significant prognostic factor within the whole cohort. CONCLUSIONS: An excellent oncological outcome, especially local control, can be achieved by both radical surgery or combined treatment in stage IB lymph node-negative cervical cancer patients with negative prognostic factors. The substantially better outcome than in the GOG 92 trial can be attributed to more accurate pre-operative and pathological staging and an improvement in surgical techniques.
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické uzliny $x patologie $7 D008198
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvantní radioterapie $x metody $7 D018714
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a nádory děložního čípku $x patologie $x chirurgie $7 D002583
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R $u Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, and Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Fischerova, Daniela $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pather, Selvan $u Chris O'Brien Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- 700 1_
- $a Lavigne, Katie $u Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, and Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Slama, Jiri $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Alektiar, Kaled $u Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, and Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Ming-Yin, Lin $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.
- 700 1_
- $a Kocian, Roman $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Germanova, Anna $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Frühauf, Filip $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dostalek, Lukas $u Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dusek, Ladislav $u Institute for Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Narayan, Kailash $u Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001958 $t Gynecologic oncology $x 1095-6859 $g Roč. 151, č. 3 (2018), s. 438-443
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30348519 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190411132258 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391545 $s 1050540
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 151 $c 3 $d 438-443 $e 20181020 $i 1095-6859 $m Gynecologic oncology $n Gynecol Oncol $x MED00001958
- GRA __
- $a NV16-31643A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405