• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Repetitive somatic embryogenesis induced cytological and proteomic changes in embryogenic lines of Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.]

F. Gautier, K. Eliášová, JC. Leplé, Z. Vondráková, AM. Lomenech, C. Le Metté, P. Label, G. Costa, JF. Trontin, C. Teyssier, MA. Lelu-Walter,

. 2018 ; 18 (1) : 164. [pub] 20180810

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19012476

BACKGROUND: To explore poorly understood differences between primary and subsequent somatic embryogenic lines of plants, we induced secondary (2ry) and tertiary (3ry) lines from cotyledonary somatic embryos (SEs) of two Douglas-fir genotypes: SD4 and TD17. The 2ry lines exhibited significantly higher embryogenic potential (SE yields) than the 1ry lines initiated from zygotic embryos (SD4, 2155 vs 477; TD17, 240 vs 29 g- 1 f.w.). Moreover, we observed similar differences in yield between 2ry and 3ry lines of SD4 (2400 vs 3921 g- 1 f.w.). To elucidate reasons for differences in embryogenic potential induced by repetitive somatic embryogenesis we then compared 2ry vs 1ry and 2ry vs 3ry lines at histo-cytological (using LC-MS/MS) and proteomic levels. RESULTS: Repetitive somatic embryogenesis dramatically improved the proliferating lines' cellular organization (genotype SD4's most strongly). Frequencies of singulated, bipolar SEs and compact polyembryogenic centers with elongated suspensors and apparently cleavable embryonal heads increased in 2ry and (even more) 3ry lines. Among 2300-2500 identified proteins, 162 and 228 were classified significantly differentially expressed between 2ry vs 1ry and 3ry vs 2ry lines, respectively, with special emphasis on "Proteolysis" and "Catabolic process" Gene Ontology categories. Strikingly, most of the significant proteins (> 70%) were down-regulated in 2ry relative to 1ry lines, but up-regulated in 3ry relative to 2ry lines, revealing a down-up pattern of expression. GO category enrichment analyses highlighted the opposite adjustments of global protein patterns, particularly for processes involved in chitin catabolism, lignin and L-phenylalanine metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, oxidation-reduction, and response to karrikin. Sub-Network Enrichment Analyses highlighted interactions between significant proteins and both plant growth regulators and secondary metabolites after first (especially jasmonic acid, flavonoids) and second (especially salicylic acid, abscisic acid, lignin) embryogenesis cycles. Protein networks established after each induction affected the same "Plant development" and "Defense response" biological processes, but most strongly after the third cycle, which could explain the top embryogenic performance of 3ry lines. CONCLUSIONS: This first report of cellular and molecular changes after repetitive somatic embryogenesis in conifers shows that each cycle enhanced the structure and singularization of EMs through modulation of growth regulator pathways, thereby improving the lines' embryogenic status.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012476
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190411092916.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12870-018-1337-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30097018
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Gautier, Florian $u BioForA, INRA, ONF, F-45075, Orléans, France. SylvaLIM, University Limoges, F-78060, Limoges, France.
245    10
$a Repetitive somatic embryogenesis induced cytological and proteomic changes in embryogenic lines of Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.] / $c F. Gautier, K. Eliášová, JC. Leplé, Z. Vondráková, AM. Lomenech, C. Le Metté, P. Label, G. Costa, JF. Trontin, C. Teyssier, MA. Lelu-Walter,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: To explore poorly understood differences between primary and subsequent somatic embryogenic lines of plants, we induced secondary (2ry) and tertiary (3ry) lines from cotyledonary somatic embryos (SEs) of two Douglas-fir genotypes: SD4 and TD17. The 2ry lines exhibited significantly higher embryogenic potential (SE yields) than the 1ry lines initiated from zygotic embryos (SD4, 2155 vs 477; TD17, 240 vs 29 g- 1 f.w.). Moreover, we observed similar differences in yield between 2ry and 3ry lines of SD4 (2400 vs 3921 g- 1 f.w.). To elucidate reasons for differences in embryogenic potential induced by repetitive somatic embryogenesis we then compared 2ry vs 1ry and 2ry vs 3ry lines at histo-cytological (using LC-MS/MS) and proteomic levels. RESULTS: Repetitive somatic embryogenesis dramatically improved the proliferating lines' cellular organization (genotype SD4's most strongly). Frequencies of singulated, bipolar SEs and compact polyembryogenic centers with elongated suspensors and apparently cleavable embryonal heads increased in 2ry and (even more) 3ry lines. Among 2300-2500 identified proteins, 162 and 228 were classified significantly differentially expressed between 2ry vs 1ry and 3ry vs 2ry lines, respectively, with special emphasis on "Proteolysis" and "Catabolic process" Gene Ontology categories. Strikingly, most of the significant proteins (> 70%) were down-regulated in 2ry relative to 1ry lines, but up-regulated in 3ry relative to 2ry lines, revealing a down-up pattern of expression. GO category enrichment analyses highlighted the opposite adjustments of global protein patterns, particularly for processes involved in chitin catabolism, lignin and L-phenylalanine metabolism, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, oxidation-reduction, and response to karrikin. Sub-Network Enrichment Analyses highlighted interactions between significant proteins and both plant growth regulators and secondary metabolites after first (especially jasmonic acid, flavonoids) and second (especially salicylic acid, abscisic acid, lignin) embryogenesis cycles. Protein networks established after each induction affected the same "Plant development" and "Defense response" biological processes, but most strongly after the third cycle, which could explain the top embryogenic performance of 3ry lines. CONCLUSIONS: This first report of cellular and molecular changes after repetitive somatic embryogenesis in conifers shows that each cycle enhanced the structure and singularization of EMs through modulation of growth regulator pathways, thereby improving the lines' embryogenic status.
650    _2
$a genové regulační sítě $7 D053263
650    _2
$a hmotnostní spektrometrie $7 D013058
650    _2
$a rostlinné proteiny $x metabolismus $x fyziologie $7 D010940
650    _2
$a somatická embryogeneze rostlin $x metody $7 D058439
650    _2
$a proteomika $7 D040901
650    _2
$a Pseudotsuga $x embryologie $x růst a vývoj $x metabolismus $7 D028224
650    _2
$a semena rostlinná $x růst a vývoj $x metabolismus $7 D012639
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Eliášová, Kateřina $u Institute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Rozvojová 263, 165 02, Praha, 6-Lysolaje, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Leplé, Jean-Charles $u BioForA, INRA, ONF, F-45075, Orléans, France. BIOGECO, INRA, University Bordeaux, F-33610, Cestas, France.
700    1_
$a Vondráková, Zuzana $u Institute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Rozvojová 263, 165 02, Praha, 6-Lysolaje, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lomenech, Anne-Marie $u Plateforme Protéome, Centre de Génomique Fonctionnelle, University Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
700    1_
$a Le Metté, Claire $u BioForA, INRA, ONF, F-45075, Orléans, France.
700    1_
$a Label, Philippe $u University Clermont Auvergne, INRA, PIAF, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
700    1_
$a Costa, Guy $u SylvaLIM, University Limoges, F-78060, Limoges, France.
700    1_
$a Trontin, Jean-François $u Pôle Biotechnologie et Sylviculture Avancée, FCBA, Campus Forêt-Bois de Pierroton, F-33610, Cestas, France.
700    1_
$a Teyssier, Caroline $u BioForA, INRA, ONF, F-45075, Orléans, France. caroline.teyssier@inra.fr.
700    1_
$a Lelu-Walter, Marie-Anne $u BioForA, INRA, ONF, F-45075, Orléans, France.
773    0_
$w MED00006798 $t BMC plant biology $x 1471-2229 $g Roč. 18, č. 1 (2018), s. 164
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30097018 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190411092934 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1391786 $s 1050781
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 18 $c 1 $d 164 $e 20180810 $i 1471-2229 $m Bmc plant biology $n BMC Plant Biol $x MED00006798
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace