-
Something wrong with this record ?
Lessons learned from the failure of several recent trials with biologic treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus
Z. Hruskova, V. Tesar,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
- MeSH
- Biological Factors therapeutic use MeSH
- Biological Products therapeutic use MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use MeSH
- Clinical Trials as Topic standards statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use MeSH
- Treatment Failure MeSH
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic drug therapy epidemiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represents a challenge due to variable disease manifestations, clinical course, and outcome. Long-term outcome in SLE remain unsatisfactory and a search for new therapeutic options is definitely warranted. Despite expectations, most clinical trials performed in SLE and lupus nephritis in the last decade did not reach primary outcome, and the only drug that has been licensed is belimumab. Areas covered: Results of negative trials testing monoclonal antibodies and other biologic agents in SLE are briefly summarized. Reasons for the failure of the trials are listed and discussed. Expert opinion: Future studies should recruit patients with similar organ involvement, better defined disease manifestations, higher activity, and similar severity. In addition to testing higher efficacy if given as add-on treatment to standard-of-care, the trials should be aimed at reducing dosing, or completely eliminating some parts of the current standard treatment, especially corticosteroids. Median follow-up of the patients should be longer. Moreover, specific biomarkers are needed to help to identify eligible patients and to better define response to treatment. An urgent unmet need is testing these new drugs in patients with severe SLE (including those refractory to current treatment).
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012523
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190411114703.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/14712598.2018.1504918 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30040494
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Hruskova, Zdenka $u a Department of Nephrology, First Faculty of Medicine , Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague , Prague , Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Lessons learned from the failure of several recent trials with biologic treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus / $c Z. Hruskova, V. Tesar,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represents a challenge due to variable disease manifestations, clinical course, and outcome. Long-term outcome in SLE remain unsatisfactory and a search for new therapeutic options is definitely warranted. Despite expectations, most clinical trials performed in SLE and lupus nephritis in the last decade did not reach primary outcome, and the only drug that has been licensed is belimumab. Areas covered: Results of negative trials testing monoclonal antibodies and other biologic agents in SLE are briefly summarized. Reasons for the failure of the trials are listed and discussed. Expert opinion: Future studies should recruit patients with similar organ involvement, better defined disease manifestations, higher activity, and similar severity. In addition to testing higher efficacy if given as add-on treatment to standard-of-care, the trials should be aimed at reducing dosing, or completely eliminating some parts of the current standard treatment, especially corticosteroids. Median follow-up of the patients should be longer. Moreover, specific biomarkers are needed to help to identify eligible patients and to better define response to treatment. An urgent unmet need is testing these new drugs in patients with severe SLE (including those refractory to current treatment).
- 650 _2
- $a monoklonální protilátky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000911
- 650 _2
- $a humanizované monoklonální protilátky $x terapeutické užití $7 D061067
- 650 _2
- $a biologické faktory $x terapeutické užití $7 D001685
- 650 _2
- $a biologické přípravky $x terapeutické užití $7 D001688
- 650 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky jako téma $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D002986
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a systémový lupus erythematodes $x farmakoterapie $x epidemiologie $7 D008180
- 650 _2
- $a neúspěšná terapie $7 D017211
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Tesar, Vladimir $u a Department of Nephrology, First Faculty of Medicine , Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague , Prague , Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181398 $t Expert opinion on biological therapy $x 1744-7682 $g Roč. 18, č. 9 (2018), s. 989-996
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30040494 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190411114720 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391833 $s 1050828
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 18 $c 9 $d 989-996 $e 20180731 $i 1744-7682 $m Expert opinion on biological therapy $n Expert Opin Biol Ther $x MED00181398
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405