Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The fate of ribosomal RNA genes in spontaneous polyploid dogrose hybrids [Rosa L. sect. Caninae (DC.) Ser.] exhibiting non-symmetrical meiosis

V. Herklotz, A. Kovařík, J. Lunerová, S. Lippitsch, M. Groth, CM. Ritz,

. 2018 ; 94 (1) : 77-90. [pub] 20180312

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19012877

Dogroses represent an exceptional system for studying the effects of genome doubling and hybridization: their asymmetrical meiosis enables recombination in bi-parentally inherited chromosomes but prevents it in maternally inherited ones. We employed fluorescent in situ hybridization, genome skimming, amplicon sequencing of genomic and cDNA as well as conventional cloning of nuclear ribosomal DNA in two phylogenetically distinct pentaploid (2n = 5x = 35) species, Rosa canina and Rosa inodora, and their naturally occurring reciprocal hybrids, Rosa dumalis (5x) and Rosa agrestis (5x, 6x). Both progenitor species differed in composition, meiotic behaviour and expression of rDNA loci: R. canina (five 18S and 5-8 5S loci) was dominated by the Canina ribotypes, but R. inodora (four 18S loci and 7-8 5S loci) by the Rubiginosa ribotype. The co-localized 5S/18S loci occurred on either bivalent-forming (R. canina) or univalent-forming (R. inodora) chromosomes. Ribosomal DNA loci were additively inherited; however, the Canina ribotypes were dominantly expressed, even in genotypes with relatively low copy number of these genes. Moreover, we observed rDNA homogenization towards the paternally transmitted Canina ribotype in 6x R. agrestis. The here-observed variation in arrangement and composition of rDNA types between R. canina and R. inodora suggests the involvement of different genomes in bivalent formation. This results supports the hypothesis that the asymmetrical meiosis arose at least twice by independent ancient hybridization events.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012877
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190412124512.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/tpj.13843 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29385286
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Herklotz, Veit $u Department of Botany, Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, Am Museum 1, D-02826, Görlitz, Germany.
245    14
$a The fate of ribosomal RNA genes in spontaneous polyploid dogrose hybrids [Rosa L. sect. Caninae (DC.) Ser.] exhibiting non-symmetrical meiosis / $c V. Herklotz, A. Kovařík, J. Lunerová, S. Lippitsch, M. Groth, CM. Ritz,
520    9_
$a Dogroses represent an exceptional system for studying the effects of genome doubling and hybridization: their asymmetrical meiosis enables recombination in bi-parentally inherited chromosomes but prevents it in maternally inherited ones. We employed fluorescent in situ hybridization, genome skimming, amplicon sequencing of genomic and cDNA as well as conventional cloning of nuclear ribosomal DNA in two phylogenetically distinct pentaploid (2n = 5x = 35) species, Rosa canina and Rosa inodora, and their naturally occurring reciprocal hybrids, Rosa dumalis (5x) and Rosa agrestis (5x, 6x). Both progenitor species differed in composition, meiotic behaviour and expression of rDNA loci: R. canina (five 18S and 5-8 5S loci) was dominated by the Canina ribotypes, but R. inodora (four 18S loci and 7-8 5S loci) by the Rubiginosa ribotype. The co-localized 5S/18S loci occurred on either bivalent-forming (R. canina) or univalent-forming (R. inodora) chromosomes. Ribosomal DNA loci were additively inherited; however, the Canina ribotypes were dominantly expressed, even in genotypes with relatively low copy number of these genes. Moreover, we observed rDNA homogenization towards the paternally transmitted Canina ribotype in 6x R. agrestis. The here-observed variation in arrangement and composition of rDNA types between R. canina and R. inodora suggests the involvement of different genomes in bivalent formation. This results supports the hypothesis that the asymmetrical meiosis arose at least twice by independent ancient hybridization events.
650    _2
$a chromozomy rostlin $x genetika $7 D032461
650    _2
$a konzervovaná sekvence $x genetika $7 D017124
650    _2
$a exprese genu $7 D015870
650    _2
$a rostlinné geny $x genetika $7 D017343
650    _2
$a geny rRNA $x genetika $7 D020459
650    _2
$a genom rostlinný $x genetika $7 D018745
650    _2
$a hybridizace genetická $x genetika $7 D006824
650    _2
$a meióza $x genetika $7 D008540
650    12
$a polyploidie $7 D011123
650    _2
$a RNA ribozomální $x genetika $7 D012335
650    _2
$a ribotypizace $7 D021521
650    _2
$a Rosa $x genetika $7 D027826
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kovařík, Aleš $u Department of Molecular Epigenetics, Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Královopolská 135, 612 65, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lunerová, Jana $u Department of Molecular Epigenetics, Institute of Biophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Královopolská 135, 612 65, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lippitsch, Susan $u Department of Ecology and Environment Protection, University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, Theodor-Körner-Allee 16, D-02763, Zittau, Germany.
700    1_
$a Groth, Marco $u Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute, Beutenbergstr. 11, D-07745, Jena, Germany.
700    1_
$a Ritz, Christiane M $u Department of Botany, Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, Am Museum 1, D-02826, Görlitz, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00003838 $t The Plant journal for cell and molecular biology $x 1365-313X $g Roč. 94, č. 1 (2018), s. 77-90
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29385286 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190412124530 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1392187 $s 1051182
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 94 $c 1 $d 77-90 $e 20180312 $i 1365-313X $m Plant journal $n Plant J $x MED00003838
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options