-
Something wrong with this record ?
Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology
JL. Orquin, K. Holmqvist,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2005
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2011-06-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Behavioral Research methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Eye Movement Measurements instrumentation standards MeSH
- Eye Movements * MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Software MeSH
- Research Design MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Eyetracking research in psychology has grown exponentially over the past decades, as equipment has become cheaper and easier to use. The surge in eyetracking research has not, however, been equaled by a growth in methodological awareness, and practices that are best avoided have become commonplace. We describe nine threats to the validity of eyetracking research and provide, whenever possible, advice on how to avoid or mitigate these challenges. These threats concern both internal and external validity and relate to the design of eyetracking studies, to data preprocessing, to data analysis, and to the interpretation of eyetracking data.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012987
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190409161508.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3758/s13428-017-0998-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29218588
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Orquin, Jacob L $u Department of Management/MAPP, Aarhus University, Fuglesangs Alle 4, DK-8210, Aarhus V, Denmark. jalo@mgmt.au.dk.
- 245 10
- $a Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology / $c JL. Orquin, K. Holmqvist,
- 520 9_
- $a Eyetracking research in psychology has grown exponentially over the past decades, as equipment has become cheaper and easier to use. The surge in eyetracking research has not, however, been equaled by a growth in methodological awareness, and practices that are best avoided have become commonplace. We describe nine threats to the validity of eyetracking research and provide, whenever possible, advice on how to avoid or mitigate these challenges. These threats concern both internal and external validity and relate to the design of eyetracking studies, to data preprocessing, to data analysis, and to the interpretation of eyetracking data.
- 650 _2
- $a behaviorální výzkum $x metody $7 D035841
- 650 _2
- $a měření pohybů očí $x přístrojové vybavení $x normy $7 D053483
- 650 12
- $a pohyby očí $7 D005133
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a výzkumný projekt $7 D012107
- 650 _2
- $a software $7 D012984
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Holmqvist, Kenneth $u UPSET, North-West University, Vaal Triangle campus, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa. Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. Department of Psychology, Regensburg University, Regensburg, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008758 $t Behavior research methods $x 1554-3528 $g Roč. 50, č. 4 (2018), s. 1645-1656
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29218588 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190409161523 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1392297 $s 1051292
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 50 $c 4 $d 1645-1656 $i 1554-3528 $m Behavior research methods $n Behav Res Methods $x MED00008758
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405