Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Specific properties of the SI and SII somatosensory areas and their effects on motor control: a system neurophysiological study

J. Friedrich, M. Mückschel, C. Beste,

. 2018 ; 223 (2) : 687-699. [pub] 20170915

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2007-07-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2007-07-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2007-07-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2007-07-01 to 1 year ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago

Sensorimotor integration is essential for successful motor control and the somatosensory modality has been shown to have strong effects on the execution of motor plans. The primary (SI) and the secondary somatosensory (SII) cortices are known to differ in their neuroanatomical connections to prefrontal areas, as well as in their involvement to encode cognitive aspects of tactile processing. Here, we ask whether the area-specific processing architecture or the structural neuroanatomical connections with prefrontal areas determine the efficacy of sensorimotor integration processes for motor control. In a system neurophysiological study including EEG signal decomposition (i.e., residue iteration decomposition, RIDE) and source localization, we investigated this question using vibrotactile stimuli optimized for SI or SII processing. The behavioral data show that when being triggered via the SI area, inhibitory control of motor processes is stronger as when being triggered via the SII area. On a neurophysiological level, these effects were reflected in the C-cluster as a result of a temporal decomposition of EEG data, indicating that the sensory processes affecting motor inhibition modulate the response selection level. These modulations were associated with a stronger activation of the right inferior frontal gyrus extending to the right middle frontal gyrus as parts of a network known to be involved in inhibitory motor control when response inhibition is triggered over SI. In addition, areas important for sensorimotor integration like the postcentral gyrus and superior parietal cortex showed activation differences. The data suggest that connection patterns are more important for sensorimotor integration and control than the more restricted area-specific processing architecture.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19013081
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190411094054.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00429-017-1515-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28917007
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Friedrich, Julia $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Schubertstrasse 42, 01309, Dresden, Germany.
245    10
$a Specific properties of the SI and SII somatosensory areas and their effects on motor control: a system neurophysiological study / $c J. Friedrich, M. Mückschel, C. Beste,
520    9_
$a Sensorimotor integration is essential for successful motor control and the somatosensory modality has been shown to have strong effects on the execution of motor plans. The primary (SI) and the secondary somatosensory (SII) cortices are known to differ in their neuroanatomical connections to prefrontal areas, as well as in their involvement to encode cognitive aspects of tactile processing. Here, we ask whether the area-specific processing architecture or the structural neuroanatomical connections with prefrontal areas determine the efficacy of sensorimotor integration processes for motor control. In a system neurophysiological study including EEG signal decomposition (i.e., residue iteration decomposition, RIDE) and source localization, we investigated this question using vibrotactile stimuli optimized for SI or SII processing. The behavioral data show that when being triggered via the SI area, inhibitory control of motor processes is stronger as when being triggered via the SII area. On a neurophysiological level, these effects were reflected in the C-cluster as a result of a temporal decomposition of EEG data, indicating that the sensory processes affecting motor inhibition modulate the response selection level. These modulations were associated with a stronger activation of the right inferior frontal gyrus extending to the right middle frontal gyrus as parts of a network known to be involved in inhibitory motor control when response inhibition is triggered over SI. In addition, areas important for sensorimotor integration like the postcentral gyrus and superior parietal cortex showed activation differences. The data suggest that connection patterns are more important for sensorimotor integration and control than the more restricted area-specific processing architecture.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
650    12
$a mapování mozku $7 D001931
650    _2
$a shluková analýza $7 D016000
650    _2
$a elektroencefalografie $7 D004569
650    _2
$a evokované potenciály $x fyziologie $7 D005071
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a inhibice (psychologie) $7 D007266
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a pohybová aktivita $x fyziologie $7 D009043
650    _2
$a psychomotorický výkon $x fyziologie $7 D011597
650    _2
$a somatosenzorické korové centrum $x anatomie a histologie $x fyziologie $7 D013003
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mückschel, Moritz $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Schubertstrasse 42, 01309, Dresden, Germany. MS Centre Dresden, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
700    1_
$a Beste, Christian $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Schubertstrasse 42, 01309, Dresden, Germany. christian.beste@uniklinikum-dresden.de. Experimental Neurobiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic. christian.beste@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
773    0_
$w MED00172985 $t Brain structure & function $x 1863-2661 $g Roč. 223, č. 2 (2018), s. 687-699
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28917007 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190411094111 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1392391 $s 1051386
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 223 $c 2 $d 687-699 $e 20170915 $i 1863-2661 $m Brain structure & function $n Brain Struct Funct $x MED00172985
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...