Aim:The aim of the study was to conduct content validation of selected NANDA International diagnoses foranInterdisciplinary Intensive Care Unit (IICU),and to identify the degree of diagnostic significance of their selected defining characteristics and relevant or risk factors. Design: Descriptive study. Methods:The set of NANDA International diagnoses and selected characteristics for validation was compiled using the following methods: 1) Content analysis of a form for planning nursing care at the IICU, Nový Jičín Hospital; 2) Literature search and selection of diagnoses from the studies found; and 3) Consensus between two experts. Subsequently, 32 nursing diagnoses with 100 defining characteristics, 72 related factors and 73 risk factors were included in the study (i.e.,a total of 245 characteristic signs). The sample of clinical experts conducting the validation consisted of 17 general nurses from the participating department. Fehring’s Diagnostic Content Validation (DCV)toolwas used. Results:Total DCV score >0.6 was identified in 16 nursing diagnoses, while values below 0.6 were calculated for the samenumber of validated diagnoses. The number of major characteristics of diagnoses (DCV ≥0.80) was 28. The number of minor characteristics (DCV 0.79–0.51) was 176, while 41 nursing characteristics of nursing diagnoses were considered diagnostically insignificant (DCV <0.5). Conclusion:On the basis of the validation study results, 16 nursing NANDA International diagnoses with 102 valid diagnostic characteristics were recommended for nursingdiagnostics in lucid adult patients at the IICU, Nový Jičín Hospital.

Department of Anthropology and Health Education Faculty of Education Palacký University Olomouc Czech Republic

Department of Nursing and Midwifery Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Czech Republic

References provided by Crossref.org

Literatura