INTRODUCTION: Impacted mesiodentes in the inverted position may interfere with the base of the nasal cavity or the nasal septum. They can rarely erupt into the nose as well. Traditionally they are extracted via intraoral approaches (transpalatal or vestibular). Also, an endoscopically assisted transnasal approach can be used. In this paper, the authors are the first to present a group of patients suffering from impacted mesiodentes who have been surgically treated using a modified maxillary vestibular approach with subperiostal intranasal dissection. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The prospective study was completed in the time period 12/2013-6/2017. The inclusion criteria were: 1. Mesiodens impacted in the inverted position extending to the base of the nasal cavity or into the nasal septum without concomitant pathological lesion and without eruption into the nasal cavity. 2. Localization of the mesiodens at the level of or dorsally to the roots of the upper middle incisors in the sagittal plane or ventrally to the roots of these teeth, but with the crown extending significantly posteriorly to the base of the nasal cavity.3. Indication for extraction because of clinical or orthodontic reasons. RESULTS: In total, 9 patients were enrolled into the group. In these patients, surgical extractions of 9 mesiodentes were performed using the alternative approach described above. All extractions were done according to a uniform surgical protocol. The mean age of the patients was 11.7 ± 3.1 years (age range 7-17 years). The crown's most cranial point exceeded the bone of the nasal cavity on average by2.0 ± 1.4 mm (in the range 0-5 mm). 8 mesiodentes were conical, 1 was tuberculate. Surgical procedure and postoperative healing were always without any complications. CONCLUSION: For the removal of midline supernumerary teeth, the modified maxillary vestibular approach with subperiostal intranasal dissection in comparison to the intraoral palatal approach provides less postoperative morbidity and a lower risk of complications (smaller surgical wound, minimal exposure of maxilla, minimal bone loss, reduced risk of damage to the roots of the upper incisors, lower risk of damage to the nasopalatine neurovascular bundle, good visibility in the surgical field, easier surgery, and finally no need of postoperative palatal splint). For oral and maxillofacial surgeons the presented technique represents a more traditional way of surgical tooth extraction than the endoscopically assisted transnasal approach.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Prague AlejSvobody 80 304 60 Pilsen Czech Republic

References provided by Crossref.org