Comparison of the short-term and long-term results of the Ponseti method in the treatment of idiopathic pes equinovarus
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
23917854
PubMed Central
PMC3764295
DOI
10.1007/s00264-013-2033-z
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Achillova šlacha chirurgie MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- manipulace ortopedická MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- osteotomie MeSH
- pes equinovarus chirurgie MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- sádrové obvazy MeSH
- tenotomie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- kojenec MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
PURPOSE: Congenital club foot is one of the most common birth defects involving the musculoskeletal system. At present two methods are used for the treatment of this deformity: French and Ponseti method. The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term (up to three years) and long-term (three to seven years) results of treatment with the Ponseti method. METHODS: A total of 195 consecutive infants (143 boys and 52 girls) with idiopathic club foot treated with the Ponseti method in the period of 2005-2012 were included in this study; the total number of feet was 303. The severity of the foot deformity was classified according to Diméglio. When relapse occurred up until three years of age, we started with the casting again. If conservative treatment was unsuccessful we proceeded to surgical treatment. RESULTS: Primary correction was attained in all cases. Surgical correction of relapses was performed in 30 % of patients according to the Ponseti method (re-tenotomy of the Achilles tendon and transposition of the tibialis anterior) and in 70 % by alternative techniques. The number of relapses indicated for surgery increased with increasing period of follow-up: whereas in patients where the treatment started already in 2005 relapses occurred in 72 %, in patients included in 2011 the number of recurrences only reached 3 %. CONCLUSIONS: It follows from our results that it is impossible to cure all club feet with casting, tenotomy of the Achilles tendon and transposition of the tibialis anterior only.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Wynne-Davies R. Family studies and aetiology of club foot. J Med Genet. 1965;2(4):227–232. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2.4.227. PubMed DOI PMC
Ponseti IV. Treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:448–454. PubMed
Dobbs MB, Rudzki JR, Purcell DB, Walton T, Porter KR, Gurnett CA. Factors predictive of outcome after use of the Ponseti method for the treatment of idiopathic clubfeet. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:22–27. PubMed
Kite JH. Nonoperative treatment of congenital clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;84:29–38. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197205000-00007. PubMed DOI
Yamamoto H, Muneta T, Morita S. Nonsurgical treatment of congenital clubfoot with manipulation, cast, and modified Denis Browne splint. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:538–542. PubMed
Diméglio A, Bensahel H, Souchet P, Mazeau P, Bonnet F. Classification of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4:129–136. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199504020-00002. PubMed DOI
Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. Congenital club foot: the results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:261–344.
Ponseti IV, Zhivkov M, Davis N, Sinclair M, Dobbs MB, Morcuende JA. Treatment of the complex idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;451:171–176. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000224062.39990.48. PubMed DOI
Ponseti IV. Congenital clubfoot: fundamentals of treatment. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 140.
Ponseti IV. Clubfoot management. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20:699–700. doi: 10.1097/01241398-200011000-00001. PubMed DOI
Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N. Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(4):517–521. PubMed
Dogan A, Kalender AM, Seramet E, Uslu M, Sebik A. Mini-open technique for the achilles tenotomy in correction of idiopathic clubfoot: a report of 25 cases. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008;98(5):414–417. PubMed
Iltar S, Uysal M, Alemdaroğlu KB, Aydoğan NH, Kara T, Atlihan D. Treatment of clubfoot with the Ponseti method: should we begin casting in the newborn period or later? J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49:426–431. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.06.010. PubMed DOI
Idelberger K. Die Ergebnisse der Zwillingsforschung beim angeborenen Klumpfuss. Verh Dtsch Orthop Ges. 1939;33:272–276.
Lochmiller C, Johnston D, Scott A, Risman M, Hecht JT. Genetic epidemiology study of idiopathic talipes equinovarus. Am J Med Genet. 1998;79(2):90–96. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19980901)79:2<90::AID-AJMG3>3.0.CO;2-R. PubMed DOI
Sano H, Uhthoff HK, Jarvis JG, Mansingh A, Wenckebach GF. Pathogenesis of soft-tissue contracture in club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:641–644. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B4.8526. PubMed DOI
Morcuende JA, Dolan LA, Dietz FR, Ponseti IV. Radical reduction in the rate of extensive corrective surgery for clubfoot using the Ponseti method. Pediatrics. 2004;113:376–380. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.2.376. PubMed DOI
Radler C, Manner HM, Suda R, Burghardt R, Herzenberg JE, Ganger R, Grill F. Radiographic evaluation of idiopathic clubfeet undergoing Ponseti treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1177–1183. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00438. PubMed DOI
Abdelgawad AA, Lehman WB, van Bosse HJ, Scher DM, Sala DA. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot using the Ponseti method: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16(2):98–105. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32801048bb. PubMed DOI
Yagmurlu MF, Ermis MN, Akdeniz HE, Kesin E, Karakas ES. Ponseti management of clubfoot after walking age. Pediatr Int. 2011;53:85–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2010.03201.x. PubMed DOI
Gibbons PJ, Gray K. Update on clubfoot. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013 PubMed
Proteomic analysis of the extracellular matrix in idiopathic pes equinovarus