• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: translating findings to the real-world setting

PG. Richardson, JF. San Miguel, P. Moreau, R. Hajek, MA. Dimopoulos, JP. Laubach, A. Palumbo, K. Luptakova, D. Romanus, T. Skacel, SK. Kumar, KC. Anderson,

. 2018 ; 8 (11) : 109. [pub] 20181109

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19028096

Grantová podpora
P50 CA186781 NCI NIH HHS - United States

Substantial improvements in survival have been seen in multiple myeloma (MM) over recent years, associated with the introduction and widespread use of multiple novel agents and regimens, as well as the emerging treatment paradigm of continuous or long-term therapy. However, these therapies and approaches may have limitations in the community setting, associated with toxicity burden, patient burden, and other factors including cost. Consequently, despite improvements in efficacy in the rigorously controlled clinical trials setting, the same results are not always achieved in real-world practice. Furthermore, the large number of different treatment options and regimens under investigation in various MM settings precludes the feasibility of obtaining head-to-head clinical trial data, and there is a temptation to use cross-trial comparisons to evaluate data across regimens. However, multiple aspects, including patient-related, disease-related, and treatment-related factors, can influence clinical trial outcomes and lead to differences between studies that may confound direct comparisons between data. In this review, we explore the various factors requiring attention when evaluating clinical trial data across available agents/regimens, as well as other considerations that may impact the translation of these findings into everyday MM management. We also investigate discrepancies between clinical trial efficacy and real-world effectiveness through a literature review of non-clinical trial data in relapsed/refractory MM on novel agent-based regimens and evaluate these data in the context of phase 3 trial results for recently approved and commonly used regimens. We thereby demonstrate the complexity of interpreting data across clinical studies in MM, as well as between clinical studies and routine-care analyses, with the aim to help clinicians consider all the necessary issues when tailoring individual patients' treatment approaches.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028096
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210803094807.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41408-018-0141-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30413684
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Richardson, Paul G $u Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Paul_Richardson@dfci.harvard.edu.
245    10
$a Interpreting clinical trial data in multiple myeloma: translating findings to the real-world setting / $c PG. Richardson, JF. San Miguel, P. Moreau, R. Hajek, MA. Dimopoulos, JP. Laubach, A. Palumbo, K. Luptakova, D. Romanus, T. Skacel, SK. Kumar, KC. Anderson,
520    9_
$a Substantial improvements in survival have been seen in multiple myeloma (MM) over recent years, associated with the introduction and widespread use of multiple novel agents and regimens, as well as the emerging treatment paradigm of continuous or long-term therapy. However, these therapies and approaches may have limitations in the community setting, associated with toxicity burden, patient burden, and other factors including cost. Consequently, despite improvements in efficacy in the rigorously controlled clinical trials setting, the same results are not always achieved in real-world practice. Furthermore, the large number of different treatment options and regimens under investigation in various MM settings precludes the feasibility of obtaining head-to-head clinical trial data, and there is a temptation to use cross-trial comparisons to evaluate data across regimens. However, multiple aspects, including patient-related, disease-related, and treatment-related factors, can influence clinical trial outcomes and lead to differences between studies that may confound direct comparisons between data. In this review, we explore the various factors requiring attention when evaluating clinical trial data across available agents/regimens, as well as other considerations that may impact the translation of these findings into everyday MM management. We also investigate discrepancies between clinical trial efficacy and real-world effectiveness through a literature review of non-clinical trial data in relapsed/refractory MM on novel agent-based regimens and evaluate these data in the context of phase 3 trial results for recently approved and commonly used regimens. We thereby demonstrate the complexity of interpreting data across clinical studies in MM, as well as between clinical studies and routine-care analyses, with the aim to help clinicians consider all the necessary issues when tailoring individual patients' treatment approaches.
650    12
$a klinické zkoušky jako téma $7 D002986
650    _2
$a komorbidita $7 D015897
650    12
$a interpretace statistických dat $7 D003627
650    _2
$a disparity zdravotní péče $7 D054625
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mnohočetný myelom $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x mortalita $x terapie $7 D009101
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a výzkumný projekt $7 D012107
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a San Miguel, Jesus F $u Centro Investigación Medica Aplicada (CIMA), IDISNA; CIBERONC, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
700    1_
$a Moreau, Philippe $u Department of Hematology, University Hospital Hôtel Dieu, Nantes, France.
700    1_
$a Hajek, Roman $u Department of Hematooncology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Dimopoulos, Meletios A $u Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
700    1_
$a Laubach, Jacob P $u Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
700    1_
$a Palumbo, Antonio $u Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA.
700    1_
$a Luptakova, Katarina $u Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA.
700    1_
$a Romanus, Dorothy $u Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA.
700    1_
$a Skácel, Tomáš $u Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA. $7 xx0262694
700    1_
$a Kumar, Shaji K $u Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
700    1_
$a Anderson, Kenneth C $u Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
773    0_
$w MED00187996 $t Blood cancer journal $x 2044-5385 $g Roč. 8, č. 11 (2018), s. 109
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30413684 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210803094804 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433245 $s 1066556
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 8 $c 11 $d 109 $e 20181109 $i 2044-5385 $m Blood cancer journal $n Blood Cancer J $x MED00187996
GRA    __
$a P50 CA186781 $p NCI NIH HHS $2 United States
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace