• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Effect of dietary supplementation with Yarrowia lipolytica or Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast and probiotic additives on haematological parameters and the gut microbiota in piglets

A. Czech, A. Smolczyk, K. Ognik, Ł. Wlazło, B. Nowakowicz-Dębek, M. Kiesz,

. 2018 ; 119 (-) : 221-227. [pub] 20180614

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19028329

The objective of the study was to compare the efficiency of two species of yeast, Yarrowia lipolytica (YL) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC), with or without a probiotic supplement, added to feed for piglets, on the basis of haematological blood indices and the gut microbiota. A total of 360 piglets (the average 27-d-old) were allotted to dietary treatments: 1) the basal control(C) diet, 2) the C diet + probiotic(P) (a mixture of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis), 3) the C diet +3%YL(Y), 4) the C diet +3%YL + probiotic(YP), 5) the C diet +3%SC(S) and 6) the C diet +3%SC + probiotic(SP). The study showed that YL yeast can be used in compound feeds for piglets interchangeably with SC yeast. The effect of YL on haematological blood parameters and the microbes colonizing the gut proved to be more beneficial than the effect of SC yeast. The combined application of YL or SC with a probiotic had a more favourable effect on the gut microbiota than the use of yeast alone. It should be noted, however, that supplementation of the compound feed with YL in combination with a probiotic reduced the multiplication of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in the intestinal contents, while the feed containing SC together with a probiotic did not. The dietary study confirmed that YL in combination with a probiotic is highly suitable for feeding piglets.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028329
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190822103109.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.06.007 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30005396
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Czech, Anna $u Department of Biochemistry and Toxicology, Faculty of Biology, Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland. Electronic address: anna.czech@up.lublin.pl.
245    10
$a Effect of dietary supplementation with Yarrowia lipolytica or Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast and probiotic additives on haematological parameters and the gut microbiota in piglets / $c A. Czech, A. Smolczyk, K. Ognik, Ł. Wlazło, B. Nowakowicz-Dębek, M. Kiesz,
520    9_
$a The objective of the study was to compare the efficiency of two species of yeast, Yarrowia lipolytica (YL) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC), with or without a probiotic supplement, added to feed for piglets, on the basis of haematological blood indices and the gut microbiota. A total of 360 piglets (the average 27-d-old) were allotted to dietary treatments: 1) the basal control(C) diet, 2) the C diet + probiotic(P) (a mixture of Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis), 3) the C diet +3%YL(Y), 4) the C diet +3%YL + probiotic(YP), 5) the C diet +3%SC(S) and 6) the C diet +3%SC + probiotic(SP). The study showed that YL yeast can be used in compound feeds for piglets interchangeably with SC yeast. The effect of YL on haematological blood parameters and the microbes colonizing the gut proved to be more beneficial than the effect of SC yeast. The combined application of YL or SC with a probiotic had a more favourable effect on the gut microbiota than the use of yeast alone. It should be noted, however, that supplementation of the compound feed with YL in combination with a probiotic reduced the multiplication of coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli in the intestinal contents, while the feed containing SC together with a probiotic did not. The dietary study confirmed that YL in combination with a probiotic is highly suitable for feeding piglets.
650    _2
$a krmivo pro zvířata $7 D000821
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a dieta $7 D004032
650    _2
$a potravní doplňky $7 D019587
650    12
$a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
650    12
$a probiotika $7 D019936
650    _2
$a Saccharomyces cerevisiae $7 D012441
650    _2
$a prasata $x krev $x mikrobiologie $7 D013552
650    _2
$a Yarrowia $7 D025062
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Smolczyk, Aleksandra $u Skotan S.A., Katowice, Poland.
700    1_
$a Ognik, Katarzyna $u Department of Biochemistry and Toxicology, Faculty of Biology, Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland. Electronic address: katarzyna.ognik@up.lublin.pl.
700    1_
$a Wlazło, Łukasz $u Department of Animal Hygiene and Environment, Faculty of Biology and Animal Breeding, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland. Electronic address: lukasz.wlazlo@up.lublin.pl.
700    1_
$a Nowakowicz-Dębek, Bożena $u Department of Animal Hygiene and Environment, Faculty of Biology and Animal Breeding, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland. Electronic address: bozena.nowakowicz@up.lublin.pl.
700    1_
$a Kiesz, Martyna $u Department of Biochemistry and Toxicology, Faculty of Biology, Animal Sciences and Bioeconomy, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland.
773    0_
$w MED00158152 $t Research in veterinary science $x 1532-2661 $g Roč. 119, č. - (2018), s. 221-227
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30005396 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190822103348 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433478 $s 1066789
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 119 $c - $d 221-227 $e 20180614 $i 1532-2661 $m Research in Veterinary Science $n Res. Vet. Sci. $x MED00158152
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...