Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Appropriate nonmycorrhizal controls in arbuscular mycorrhiza research: a microbiome perspective

M. Gryndler, P. Šmilauer, D. Püschel, P. Bukovská, H. Hršelová, M. Hujslová, H. Gryndlerová, O. Beskid, T. Konvalinková, J. Jansa,

. 2018 ; 28 (5-6) : 435-450. [pub] 20180621

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19028359

Establishment of nonmycorrhizal controls is a "classic and recurrent theme" in mycorrhizal research. For decades, authors reported mycorrhizal plant growth/nutrition as compared to various nonmycorrhizal controls. In such studies, uncertainties remain about which nonmycorrhizal controls are most appropriate and, in particular, what effects the control inoculations have on substrate and root microbiomes. Here, different types of control and mycorrhizal inoculations were compared with respect to plant growth and nutrition, as well as the structure of root and substrate microbiomes, assessed by next-generation sequencing. We compared uninoculated ("absolute") control to inoculation with blank pot culture lacking arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, filtrate of that blank inoculum, and filtrate of complex pot-produced mycorrhizal inoculum. Those treatments were compared to a standard mycorrhizal treatment, where the previously sterilized substrate was inoculated with complex pot-produced inoculum containing Rhizophagus irregularis SYM5. Besides this, monoxenically produced inoculum of the same fungus was applied either alone or in combination with blank inoculum. The results indicate that the presence of mycorrhizal fungus always resulted in stimulation of Andropogon gerardii plant biomass as well as in elevated phosphorus content of the plants. The microbial (bacterial and fungal) communities developing in the differently inoculated treatments, however, differed substantially from each other and no control could be obtained comparable with the treatment inoculated with complex mycorrhizal inoculum. Soil microorganisms with significant biological competences that could potentially contribute to the effects of the various inoculants on the plants were detected in roots and in plant cultivation substrate in some of the treatments.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028359
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241126150657.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00572-018-0844-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29931404
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Gryndler, Milan $u Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic. gryndler@centrum.cz. Faculty of Science, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, České mládeže 8, 400 96, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic. gryndler@centrum.cz.
245    10
$a Appropriate nonmycorrhizal controls in arbuscular mycorrhiza research: a microbiome perspective / $c M. Gryndler, P. Šmilauer, D. Püschel, P. Bukovská, H. Hršelová, M. Hujslová, H. Gryndlerová, O. Beskid, T. Konvalinková, J. Jansa,
520    9_
$a Establishment of nonmycorrhizal controls is a "classic and recurrent theme" in mycorrhizal research. For decades, authors reported mycorrhizal plant growth/nutrition as compared to various nonmycorrhizal controls. In such studies, uncertainties remain about which nonmycorrhizal controls are most appropriate and, in particular, what effects the control inoculations have on substrate and root microbiomes. Here, different types of control and mycorrhizal inoculations were compared with respect to plant growth and nutrition, as well as the structure of root and substrate microbiomes, assessed by next-generation sequencing. We compared uninoculated ("absolute") control to inoculation with blank pot culture lacking arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, filtrate of that blank inoculum, and filtrate of complex pot-produced mycorrhizal inoculum. Those treatments were compared to a standard mycorrhizal treatment, where the previously sterilized substrate was inoculated with complex pot-produced inoculum containing Rhizophagus irregularis SYM5. Besides this, monoxenically produced inoculum of the same fungus was applied either alone or in combination with blank inoculum. The results indicate that the presence of mycorrhizal fungus always resulted in stimulation of Andropogon gerardii plant biomass as well as in elevated phosphorus content of the plants. The microbial (bacterial and fungal) communities developing in the differently inoculated treatments, however, differed substantially from each other and no control could be obtained comparable with the treatment inoculated with complex mycorrhizal inoculum. Soil microorganisms with significant biological competences that could potentially contribute to the effects of the various inoculants on the plants were detected in roots and in plant cultivation substrate in some of the treatments.
650    _2
$a Andropogon $x mikrobiologie $7 D031722
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x metabolismus $7 D001419
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování $7 D059014
650    12
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a mykorhiza $x fyziologie $7 D038821
650    _2
$a fosfor $x analýza $7 D010758
650    _2
$a kořeny rostlin $x mikrobiologie $7 D018517
650    12
$a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
650    _2
$a symbióza $7 D013559
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Šmilauer, Petr $u Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Püschel, David $u Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bukovská, Petra $u Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic. $7 xx0326030
700    1_
$a Hršelová, Hana $u Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hujslová, Martina $u Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Gryndlerová, Hana $u Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Beskid, Olena $u Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Konvalinková, Tereza $u Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jansa, Jan $u Institute of Microbiology, v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180395 $t Mycorrhiza $x 1432-1890 $g Roč. 28, č. 5-6 (2018), s. 435-450
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29931404 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241126150653 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433508 $s 1066819
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 28 $c 5-6 $d 435-450 $e 20180621 $i 1432-1890 $m Mycorrhiza $n Mycorrhiza $x MED00180395
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...