• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of titer results obtained using immediate spin one-dilution techniques to a reference method

MH. Yazer, NM. Dunbar, CB. Bub, BE. Condict, R. Dunn, M. Janoušková, J. Kutner, L. Landová, H. Lejdarová, B. Nesvačilová, R. Pacasová, R. Procházková, L. Řehořová, JS. Raval, A. Ziman, M. Bohonĕk,

. 2019 ; 59 (S2) : 1512-1517. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19034632

BACKGROUND: Many transfusion services determine the titer of potentially incompatible plasma-containing products by performing a one-dilution titer at their selected titer threshold. This study compared the results of immediate spin (IS) one-dilution titers determined by three methods with a reference standard method. METHODS: Plasma-containing products from group A and O donors were titered using the participant's routine IS one-dilution titer method. No time or temperature incubations were performed, and antihuman globulin reagent was not used. The samples were then tested using a reference method, which was a saline tube test with a 1-hour room temperature incubation; antihuman globulin was not used in the reference method. The results of the one-dilution titer were then compared to that obtained in the reference method. RESULTS: Nine centers participated in this study. There were 698 antibodies from 374 units tested by the manual IS tube one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.92), and specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00). There were 412 antibodies from 206 units tested by the manual and automated IS buffered gel card one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and specificity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91). There were 98 antibodies from 49 units tested by an automated microplate IS one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.93), and specificity was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). All three methods had an accuracy rate of 90% or greater. CONCLUSION: The manual and automated one-dilution titer methods are suitable for screening plasma-containing units, although more evaluation of the automated microplate method might be required.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19034632
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191014120519.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/trf.15170 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30980760
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Yazer, Mark H $u Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
245    10
$a Comparison of titer results obtained using immediate spin one-dilution techniques to a reference method / $c MH. Yazer, NM. Dunbar, CB. Bub, BE. Condict, R. Dunn, M. Janoušková, J. Kutner, L. Landová, H. Lejdarová, B. Nesvačilová, R. Pacasová, R. Procházková, L. Řehořová, JS. Raval, A. Ziman, M. Bohonĕk,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Many transfusion services determine the titer of potentially incompatible plasma-containing products by performing a one-dilution titer at their selected titer threshold. This study compared the results of immediate spin (IS) one-dilution titers determined by three methods with a reference standard method. METHODS: Plasma-containing products from group A and O donors were titered using the participant's routine IS one-dilution titer method. No time or temperature incubations were performed, and antihuman globulin reagent was not used. The samples were then tested using a reference method, which was a saline tube test with a 1-hour room temperature incubation; antihuman globulin was not used in the reference method. The results of the one-dilution titer were then compared to that obtained in the reference method. RESULTS: Nine centers participated in this study. There were 698 antibodies from 374 units tested by the manual IS tube one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.92), and specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00). There were 412 antibodies from 206 units tested by the manual and automated IS buffered gel card one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and specificity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91). There were 98 antibodies from 49 units tested by an automated microplate IS one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.93), and specificity was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). All three methods had an accuracy rate of 90% or greater. CONCLUSION: The manual and automated one-dilution titer methods are suitable for screening plasma-containing units, although more evaluation of the automated microplate method might be required.
650    _2
$a ABO systém krevních skupin $x krev $7 D000017
650    _2
$a nekompatibilita krevních skupin $x krev $7 D001787
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a indikátorové diluční techniky $7 D007201
650    _2
$a isoprotilátky $x krev $7 D007518
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a odběr biologického vzorku $x metody $7 D013048
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Dunbar, Nancy M $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
700    1_
$a Bub, Carolina Bonet $u Department of Hemotherapy and Cell Terapy, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
700    1_
$a Condict, Brittany E $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
700    1_
$a Dunn, Robyn $u Wing-Kwai and Alice Lee-Tsing Chung Transfusion Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California.
700    1_
$a Janoušková, Miloslava $u Blood Transfusion Department, Regional Hospital Karlovy Vary, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kutner, Jose $u Department of Hemotherapy and Cell Terapy, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
700    1_
$a Landová, Ludmila $u Department of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lejdarová, Hana $u Blood Transfusion and Tissue Department, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Nesvačilová, Božena $u Blood Transfusion Department, Regional Hospital Karlovy Vary, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pacasová, Rita $u Blood Transfusion and Tissue Department, University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Procházková, Renata $u Department of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Řehořová, Lenka $u Department of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Regional Hospital Liberec, Liberec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Raval, Jay S $u Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
700    1_
$a Ziman, Alyssa $u Wing-Kwai and Alice Lee-Tsing Chung Transfusion Service, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UCLA Health, Los Angeles, California.
700    1_
$a Bohonĕk, Miloš $u Department of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Military University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00004547 $t Transfusion $x 1537-2995 $g Roč. 59, S2 (2019), s. 1512-1517
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30980760 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191014120943 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451292 $s 1073182
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 59 $c S2 $d 1512-1517 $e - $i 1537-2995 $m Transfusion $n Transfusion $x MED00004547
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...