• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Clinical Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most?

G. Ntentas, K. Dedeckova, M. Andrlik, MC. Aznar, B. George, J. Kubeš, SC. Darby, DJ. Cutter,

. 2019 ; 9 (3) : 179-187. [pub] 20190129

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19034788

Grantová podpora
MC_U137686858 Medical Research Council - United Kingdom

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) improves control of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but patients who undergo RT are at risk for late effects, including cardiovascular disease and second cancers, because of radiation doses to organs at risk (OARs). Proton therapy (PT) can reduce OAR doses compared with conventional photon RT. However, access to PT is currently limited, so referrals must be appropriately selective. We aimed to identify subgroups of patients with HL who could benefit the most dosimetrically from RT with PT based on the prechemotherapy disease characteristics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Normal tissue radiation doses were calculated for 21 patients with HL who were treated with deep-inspiration breath-hold pencil-beam scanning (PBS) PT and compared with doses from 3-dimensional conformal (3D-CRT) and partial arc volumetric modulated (PartArc) photon RT. Prechemotherapy disease characteristics associated with significant dosimetric benefits from PBS compared with photon RT were identified. RESULTS: Treatment with PBS was well tolerated and provided with good local control. PBS provided dosimetric advantages for patients whose clinical treatment volume extended below the seventh thoracic level and for female patients with axillary disease. In addition, an increasing dosimetric benefit for some OARs was observed for increasing target volume. PBS significantly reduced the mean dose to the heart, breast, lungs, spinal cord, and esophagus. Dose homogeneity and conformity within the target volume were also superior with PBS, but some high-dose measures and hot spots were increased with PBS compared with partial arc volumetric modulated photon RT. CONCLUSIONS: PBS gives good target coverage and local control while providing reductions in radiation dose to OARs for individuals who receive RT for HL compared with advanced photon RT. Our findings highlight groups of patients who would be expected to gain more dosimetric benefit from PBS. These findings facilitate the selection of patients who should be considered a priority for PT.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19034788
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240902112125.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.prro.2019.01.006 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30708133
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Ntentas, Georgios $u Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: georgios.ntentas@ndph.ox.ac.uk.
245    10
$a Clinical Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Which Patients Benefit the Most? / $c G. Ntentas, K. Dedeckova, M. Andrlik, MC. Aznar, B. George, J. Kubeš, SC. Darby, DJ. Cutter,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) improves control of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but patients who undergo RT are at risk for late effects, including cardiovascular disease and second cancers, because of radiation doses to organs at risk (OARs). Proton therapy (PT) can reduce OAR doses compared with conventional photon RT. However, access to PT is currently limited, so referrals must be appropriately selective. We aimed to identify subgroups of patients with HL who could benefit the most dosimetrically from RT with PT based on the prechemotherapy disease characteristics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Normal tissue radiation doses were calculated for 21 patients with HL who were treated with deep-inspiration breath-hold pencil-beam scanning (PBS) PT and compared with doses from 3-dimensional conformal (3D-CRT) and partial arc volumetric modulated (PartArc) photon RT. Prechemotherapy disease characteristics associated with significant dosimetric benefits from PBS compared with photon RT were identified. RESULTS: Treatment with PBS was well tolerated and provided with good local control. PBS provided dosimetric advantages for patients whose clinical treatment volume extended below the seventh thoracic level and for female patients with axillary disease. In addition, an increasing dosimetric benefit for some OARs was observed for increasing target volume. PBS significantly reduced the mean dose to the heart, breast, lungs, spinal cord, and esophagus. Dose homogeneity and conformity within the target volume were also superior with PBS, but some high-dose measures and hot spots were increased with PBS compared with partial arc volumetric modulated photon RT. CONCLUSIONS: PBS gives good target coverage and local control while providing reductions in radiation dose to OARs for individuals who receive RT for HL compared with advanced photon RT. Our findings highlight groups of patients who would be expected to gain more dosimetric benefit from PBS. These findings facilitate the selection of patients who should be considered a priority for PT.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a Hodgkinova nemoc $x farmakoterapie $x radioterapie $7 D006689
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a kritické orgány $7 D058958
650    _2
$a protonová terapie $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D061766
650    _2
$a radiační poranění $x etiologie $7 D011832
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
650    _2
$a konformní radioterapie $x metody $7 D020266
650    _2
$a radioterapie s modulovanou intenzitou $x metody $7 D050397
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Dedeckova, Katerina $u Proton Therapy Center Czech s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Andrlík, Michal $u Proton Therapy Center Czech s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0322119
700    1_
$a Aznar, Marianne C $u Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a George, Ben $u CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Kubeš, Jiří $u Proton Therapy Center Czech s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Darby, Sarah C $u Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Cutter, David J $u Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Oxford Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
773    0_
$w MED00200664 $t Practical radiation oncology $x 1879-8519 $g Roč. 9, č. 3 (2019), s. 179-187
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30708133 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240902112123 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451448 $s 1073338
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 9 $c 3 $d 179-187 $e 20190129 $i 1879-8519 $m Practical radiation oncology $n Pract Radiat Oncol $x MED00200664
GRA    __
$a MC_U137686858 $p Medical Research Council $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...