• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the presentation of virtual histology slides by students during classes. Are there any differences in approach between dentistry and general medicine students?

Z. Tauber, K. Cizkova, R. Lichnovska, H. Lacey, B. Erdosova, R. Zizka, V. Kamarad,

. 2019 ; 23 (2) : 119-126. [pub] 20190129

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19034854

INTRODUCTION: Virtual microscopy, used as a method to teach histology, has many undeniable advantages. However, the usefulness of this method is somewhat limited by the difficulties students face in finding their way through huge amounts of digital data, compounded by decreased interaction between students and teachers. We describe the results of a recent pilot project which combined the modern teaching methods of active learning, where students themselves present histological slides and make use of the virtual microscopy system. METHODS: Students' responses to a structured questionnaire and examination results were evaluated. RESULTS: We found that a combination of both electronic materials and textbooks was commonly used by students to prepare for practical teaching sessions, with electronic resources being used regularly by the majority of students. No statistically relevant differences were found between the approaches of dentistry vs general medicine students. Cooperation between students' groups during the preparation for individual presentations was seen to be beneficial by a majority of dentistry students; they reported that the introduction of student-led presentations improved their quality of preparation for practical lessons, as well as increasing their participation and activity level in the lessons themselves. These different approaches and motivations between students of dentistry and general medicine are reflected in the test results where dentistry students are more successful. CONCLUSION: We confirm that there are differences in motivation, approaches and examination results between both groups of students, which should be taken into account and which could lead to differentiation of future curricula for both study courses.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19034854
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210608143644.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2019 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/eje.12410 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30582772
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Tauber, Zdenek $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Evaluation of the effectiveness of the presentation of virtual histology slides by students during classes. Are there any differences in approach between dentistry and general medicine students? / $c Z. Tauber, K. Cizkova, R. Lichnovska, H. Lacey, B. Erdosova, R. Zizka, V. Kamarad,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Virtual microscopy, used as a method to teach histology, has many undeniable advantages. However, the usefulness of this method is somewhat limited by the difficulties students face in finding their way through huge amounts of digital data, compounded by decreased interaction between students and teachers. We describe the results of a recent pilot project which combined the modern teaching methods of active learning, where students themselves present histological slides and make use of the virtual microscopy system. METHODS: Students' responses to a structured questionnaire and examination results were evaluated. RESULTS: We found that a combination of both electronic materials and textbooks was commonly used by students to prepare for practical teaching sessions, with electronic resources being used regularly by the majority of students. No statistically relevant differences were found between the approaches of dentistry vs general medicine students. Cooperation between students' groups during the preparation for individual presentations was seen to be beneficial by a majority of dentistry students; they reported that the introduction of student-led presentations improved their quality of preparation for practical lessons, as well as increasing their participation and activity level in the lessons themselves. These different approaches and motivations between students of dentistry and general medicine are reflected in the test results where dentistry students are more successful. CONCLUSION: We confirm that there are differences in motivation, approaches and examination results between both groups of students, which should be taken into account and which could lead to differentiation of future curricula for both study courses.
650    _2
$a studium stomatologie $x metody $7 D004497
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a histologie $x výchova $7 D006653
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a učení $7 D007858
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mikroskopie $x metody $7 D008853
650    _2
$a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
650    _2
$a studenti stomatologie $x psychologie $7 D013335
650    _2
$a studenti lékařství $x psychologie $7 D013337
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    12
$a vyučování $7 D013663
650    _2
$a učební pomůcky $7 D013664
650    12
$a virtuální realita $7 D000076142
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Cizkova, Katerina $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lichnovska, Radka $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lacey, Helena $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. $7 xx0260781
700    1_
$a Erdosova, Bela $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zizka, Radovan $u Czech Educational and Dental Research Innovative Group, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kamarad, Vojtech $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001614 $t European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe $x 1600-0579 $g Roč. 23, č. 2 (2019), s. 119-126
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30582772 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210608143642 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451514 $s 1073404
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 23 $c 2 $d 119-126 $e 20190129 $i 1600-0579 $m European journal of dental education $n Eur. j. dent. educ. $x MED00001614
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...