-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the presentation of virtual histology slides by students during classes. Are there any differences in approach between dentistry and general medicine students?
Z. Tauber, K. Cizkova, R. Lichnovska, H. Lacey, B. Erdosova, R. Zizka, V. Kamarad,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
PubMed
30582772
DOI
10.1111/eje.12410
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- histologie výchova MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mikroskopie metody MeSH
- pilotní projekty MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- studenti lékařství psychologie MeSH
- studenti stomatologie psychologie MeSH
- studium stomatologie metody MeSH
- učební pomůcky MeSH
- učení * MeSH
- virtuální realita * MeSH
- vyučování * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Virtual microscopy, used as a method to teach histology, has many undeniable advantages. However, the usefulness of this method is somewhat limited by the difficulties students face in finding their way through huge amounts of digital data, compounded by decreased interaction between students and teachers. We describe the results of a recent pilot project which combined the modern teaching methods of active learning, where students themselves present histological slides and make use of the virtual microscopy system. METHODS: Students' responses to a structured questionnaire and examination results were evaluated. RESULTS: We found that a combination of both electronic materials and textbooks was commonly used by students to prepare for practical teaching sessions, with electronic resources being used regularly by the majority of students. No statistically relevant differences were found between the approaches of dentistry vs general medicine students. Cooperation between students' groups during the preparation for individual presentations was seen to be beneficial by a majority of dentistry students; they reported that the introduction of student-led presentations improved their quality of preparation for practical lessons, as well as increasing their participation and activity level in the lessons themselves. These different approaches and motivations between students of dentistry and general medicine are reflected in the test results where dentistry students are more successful. CONCLUSION: We confirm that there are differences in motivation, approaches and examination results between both groups of students, which should be taken into account and which could lead to differentiation of future curricula for both study courses.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19034854
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210608143644.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2019 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/eje.12410 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30582772
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Tauber, Zdenek $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of the effectiveness of the presentation of virtual histology slides by students during classes. Are there any differences in approach between dentistry and general medicine students? / $c Z. Tauber, K. Cizkova, R. Lichnovska, H. Lacey, B. Erdosova, R. Zizka, V. Kamarad,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Virtual microscopy, used as a method to teach histology, has many undeniable advantages. However, the usefulness of this method is somewhat limited by the difficulties students face in finding their way through huge amounts of digital data, compounded by decreased interaction between students and teachers. We describe the results of a recent pilot project which combined the modern teaching methods of active learning, where students themselves present histological slides and make use of the virtual microscopy system. METHODS: Students' responses to a structured questionnaire and examination results were evaluated. RESULTS: We found that a combination of both electronic materials and textbooks was commonly used by students to prepare for practical teaching sessions, with electronic resources being used regularly by the majority of students. No statistically relevant differences were found between the approaches of dentistry vs general medicine students. Cooperation between students' groups during the preparation for individual presentations was seen to be beneficial by a majority of dentistry students; they reported that the introduction of student-led presentations improved their quality of preparation for practical lessons, as well as increasing their participation and activity level in the lessons themselves. These different approaches and motivations between students of dentistry and general medicine are reflected in the test results where dentistry students are more successful. CONCLUSION: We confirm that there are differences in motivation, approaches and examination results between both groups of students, which should be taken into account and which could lead to differentiation of future curricula for both study courses.
- 650 _2
- $a studium stomatologie $x metody $7 D004497
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a histologie $x výchova $7 D006653
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a učení $7 D007858
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a mikroskopie $x metody $7 D008853
- 650 _2
- $a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
- 650 _2
- $a studenti stomatologie $x psychologie $7 D013335
- 650 _2
- $a studenti lékařství $x psychologie $7 D013337
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 12
- $a vyučování $7 D013663
- 650 _2
- $a učební pomůcky $7 D013664
- 650 12
- $a virtuální realita $7 D000076142
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Cizkova, Katerina $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Lichnovska, Radka $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Lacey, Helena $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. $7 xx0260781
- 700 1_
- $a Erdosova, Bela $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zizka, Radovan $u Czech Educational and Dental Research Innovative Group, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kamarad, Vojtech $u Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001614 $t European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe $x 1600-0579 $g Roč. 23, č. 2 (2019), s. 119-126
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30582772 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210608143642 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1451514 $s 1073404
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 23 $c 2 $d 119-126 $e 20190129 $i 1600-0579 $m European journal of dental education $n Eur. j. dent. educ. $x MED00001614
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007