-
Something wrong with this record ?
Assessment of renal function before contrast media injection: right decisions based on inaccurate estimates
V. Ptáčník, D. Zogala, D. Skibová, H. Jiskrová, J. Trnka, V. Tesař, R. Ryšavá, M. Šámal,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
303/07/0950
Czech Science Foundation (Grantová Agentura České Republiky)
NLK
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Renal Insufficiency, Chronic blood diagnosis physiopathology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Glomerular Filtration Rate physiology MeSH
- Injections, Intravenous MeSH
- Contrast Media administration & dosage MeSH
- Creatinine blood MeSH
- Kidney diagnostic imaging metabolism physiopathology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Radiography methods MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Information on renal function required before specified radiological examinations with contrast agents is usually obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data. The aim of our study was to demonstrate discrepancy between poor prediction and good diagnostic accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by prediction equations. METHODS: In 50 patients, reference GFR was measured as plasma clearance of 51-chromium labeled ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic-acid (51Cr-EDTA) and compared with GFR assayed by creatinine clearance (CC) and estimated by Cockcroft-Gault prediction equation (CG). For comparisons, CC and CG were considered as continuous, categorical, and binary variables. Accuracy of the reference GFR prediction was expressed in terms of prediction errors and diagnostic accuracy indices. RESULTS: As continuous variable, CG estimated individual values of GFR with large prediction error exceeding that of CC. As categorical variable, it classified the patient stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with medium diagnostic accuracy of 74% (CKD 3) and 62% (CKD 4). As binary variable, CG classified individual patient's GFR below 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with good diagnostic accuracy of 80 and 94%, respectively. Performance of other prediction equations did not significantly differ from CG. CONCLUSIONS: Despite large variance and poor prediction accuracy of individual GFR estimates, most of them correctly classified individual patient's GFR below specified level. Results of prediction equations thus should be used and reported exclusively as binary variables, while numerical values of GFR, if required, should be measured by more accurate radionuclide or laboratory methods. KEY POINTS: • Radiological guidelines on contrast media require estimation of glomerular filtration rate to assess kidney function before specified contrast examinations. • Estimated glomerular filtration rate is obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data as predictors. • While numerical estimates of glomerular filtration rate are inaccurate (their prediction accuracy is poor), diagnostic accuracy of binary estimates (ability to classify patient's glomerular filtration rate below or above a specified level) is very good.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19034910
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191011110035.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2019 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00330-018-5753-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30413953
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Ptáčník, Václav $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Assessment of renal function before contrast media injection: right decisions based on inaccurate estimates / $c V. Ptáčník, D. Zogala, D. Skibová, H. Jiskrová, J. Trnka, V. Tesař, R. Ryšavá, M. Šámal,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: Information on renal function required before specified radiological examinations with contrast agents is usually obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data. The aim of our study was to demonstrate discrepancy between poor prediction and good diagnostic accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by prediction equations. METHODS: In 50 patients, reference GFR was measured as plasma clearance of 51-chromium labeled ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic-acid (51Cr-EDTA) and compared with GFR assayed by creatinine clearance (CC) and estimated by Cockcroft-Gault prediction equation (CG). For comparisons, CC and CG were considered as continuous, categorical, and binary variables. Accuracy of the reference GFR prediction was expressed in terms of prediction errors and diagnostic accuracy indices. RESULTS: As continuous variable, CG estimated individual values of GFR with large prediction error exceeding that of CC. As categorical variable, it classified the patient stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with medium diagnostic accuracy of 74% (CKD 3) and 62% (CKD 4). As binary variable, CG classified individual patient's GFR below 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with good diagnostic accuracy of 80 and 94%, respectively. Performance of other prediction equations did not significantly differ from CG. CONCLUSIONS: Despite large variance and poor prediction accuracy of individual GFR estimates, most of them correctly classified individual patient's GFR below specified level. Results of prediction equations thus should be used and reported exclusively as binary variables, while numerical values of GFR, if required, should be measured by more accurate radionuclide or laboratory methods. KEY POINTS: • Radiological guidelines on contrast media require estimation of glomerular filtration rate to assess kidney function before specified contrast examinations. • Estimated glomerular filtration rate is obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data as predictors. • While numerical estimates of glomerular filtration rate are inaccurate (their prediction accuracy is poor), diagnostic accuracy of binary estimates (ability to classify patient's glomerular filtration rate below or above a specified level) is very good.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a kontrastní látky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D003287
- 650 _2
- $a kreatinin $x krev $7 D003404
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a hodnoty glomerulární filtrace $x fyziologie $7 D005919
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a injekce intravenózní $7 D007275
- 650 _2
- $a ledviny $x diagnostické zobrazování $x metabolismus $x patofyziologie $7 D007668
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a radiografie $x metody $7 D011859
- 650 _2
- $a chronická renální insuficience $x krev $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D051436
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Zogala, David $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Skibová, Daniela $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic. Department of Radiation Protection, General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jiskrová, Hana $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Trnka, Jiří $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic. Department of Radiation Protection, General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Tesař, Vladimír $u Department of Nephrology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Ryšavá, Romana $u Department of Nephrology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Šámal, Martin $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic. samal@cesnet.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009646 $t European radiology $x 1432-1084 $g Roč. 29, č. 6 (2019), s. 3192-3199
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30413953 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191011110455 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1451570 $s 1073460
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 29 $c 6 $d 3192-3199 $e 20181109 $i 1432-1084 $m European radiology $n Eur Radiol $x MED00009646
- GRA __
- $a 303/07/0950 $p Czech Science Foundation (Grantová Agentura České Republiky)
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007