• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Assessment of renal function before contrast media injection: right decisions based on inaccurate estimates

V. Ptáčník, D. Zogala, D. Skibová, H. Jiskrová, J. Trnka, V. Tesař, R. Ryšavá, M. Šámal,

. 2019 ; 29 (6) : 3192-3199. [pub] 20181109

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19034910

Grantová podpora
303/07/0950 Czech Science Foundation (Grantová Agentura České Republiky)

OBJECTIVES: Information on renal function required before specified radiological examinations with contrast agents is usually obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data. The aim of our study was to demonstrate discrepancy between poor prediction and good diagnostic accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by prediction equations. METHODS: In 50 patients, reference GFR was measured as plasma clearance of 51-chromium labeled ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic-acid (51Cr-EDTA) and compared with GFR assayed by creatinine clearance (CC) and estimated by Cockcroft-Gault prediction equation (CG). For comparisons, CC and CG were considered as continuous, categorical, and binary variables. Accuracy of the reference GFR prediction was expressed in terms of prediction errors and diagnostic accuracy indices. RESULTS: As continuous variable, CG estimated individual values of GFR with large prediction error exceeding that of CC. As categorical variable, it classified the patient stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with medium diagnostic accuracy of 74% (CKD 3) and 62% (CKD 4). As binary variable, CG classified individual patient's GFR below 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with good diagnostic accuracy of 80 and 94%, respectively. Performance of other prediction equations did not significantly differ from CG. CONCLUSIONS: Despite large variance and poor prediction accuracy of individual GFR estimates, most of them correctly classified individual patient's GFR below specified level. Results of prediction equations thus should be used and reported exclusively as binary variables, while numerical values of GFR, if required, should be measured by more accurate radionuclide or laboratory methods. KEY POINTS: • Radiological guidelines on contrast media require estimation of glomerular filtration rate to assess kidney function before specified contrast examinations. • Estimated glomerular filtration rate is obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data as predictors. • While numerical estimates of glomerular filtration rate are inaccurate (their prediction accuracy is poor), diagnostic accuracy of binary estimates (ability to classify patient's glomerular filtration rate below or above a specified level) is very good.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19034910
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191011110035.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2019 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00330-018-5753-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30413953
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Ptáčník, Václav $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Assessment of renal function before contrast media injection: right decisions based on inaccurate estimates / $c V. Ptáčník, D. Zogala, D. Skibová, H. Jiskrová, J. Trnka, V. Tesař, R. Ryšavá, M. Šámal,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVES: Information on renal function required before specified radiological examinations with contrast agents is usually obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data. The aim of our study was to demonstrate discrepancy between poor prediction and good diagnostic accuracy of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by prediction equations. METHODS: In 50 patients, reference GFR was measured as plasma clearance of 51-chromium labeled ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic-acid (51Cr-EDTA) and compared with GFR assayed by creatinine clearance (CC) and estimated by Cockcroft-Gault prediction equation (CG). For comparisons, CC and CG were considered as continuous, categorical, and binary variables. Accuracy of the reference GFR prediction was expressed in terms of prediction errors and diagnostic accuracy indices. RESULTS: As continuous variable, CG estimated individual values of GFR with large prediction error exceeding that of CC. As categorical variable, it classified the patient stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with medium diagnostic accuracy of 74% (CKD 3) and 62% (CKD 4). As binary variable, CG classified individual patient's GFR below 30 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with good diagnostic accuracy of 80 and 94%, respectively. Performance of other prediction equations did not significantly differ from CG. CONCLUSIONS: Despite large variance and poor prediction accuracy of individual GFR estimates, most of them correctly classified individual patient's GFR below specified level. Results of prediction equations thus should be used and reported exclusively as binary variables, while numerical values of GFR, if required, should be measured by more accurate radionuclide or laboratory methods. KEY POINTS: • Radiological guidelines on contrast media require estimation of glomerular filtration rate to assess kidney function before specified contrast examinations. • Estimated glomerular filtration rate is obtained through prediction equations using serum creatinine and anthropometric data as predictors. • While numerical estimates of glomerular filtration rate are inaccurate (their prediction accuracy is poor), diagnostic accuracy of binary estimates (ability to classify patient's glomerular filtration rate below or above a specified level) is very good.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a kontrastní látky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D003287
650    _2
$a kreatinin $x krev $7 D003404
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a hodnoty glomerulární filtrace $x fyziologie $7 D005919
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a injekce intravenózní $7 D007275
650    _2
$a ledviny $x diagnostické zobrazování $x metabolismus $x patofyziologie $7 D007668
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a radiografie $x metody $7 D011859
650    _2
$a chronická renální insuficience $x krev $x diagnóza $x patofyziologie $7 D051436
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Zogala, David $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Skibová, Daniela $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic. Department of Radiation Protection, General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jiskrová, Hana $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Trnka, Jiří $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic. Department of Radiation Protection, General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tesař, Vladimír $u Department of Nephrology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ryšavá, Romana $u Department of Nephrology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, U nemocnice 2, 128 08, Praha 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šámal, Martin $u Institute of Nuclear Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Salmovská 3, 120 00, Praha 2, Czech Republic. samal@cesnet.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00009646 $t European radiology $x 1432-1084 $g Roč. 29, č. 6 (2019), s. 3192-3199
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30413953 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191011110455 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451570 $s 1073460
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 29 $c 6 $d 3192-3199 $e 20181109 $i 1432-1084 $m European radiology $n Eur Radiol $x MED00009646
GRA    __
$a 303/07/0950 $p Czech Science Foundation (Grantová Agentura České Republiky)
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...