• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Selective prevention of cardiometabolic diseases: activities and attitudes of general practitioners across Europe

AM. de Waard, M. Hollander, JC. Korevaar, MMJ. Nielen, AC. Carlsson, C. Lionis, B. Seifert, T. Thilsing, NJ. de Wit, FG. Schellevis, SPIMEU Project Group,

. 2019 ; 29 (1) : 88-93. [pub] 20190201

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19035122

Background: Cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs) are the number one cause of death. Selective prevention of CMDs by general practitioners (GPs) could help reduce the burden of CMDs. This measure would entail the identification of individuals at high risk of CMDs-but currently asymptomatic-followed by interventions to reduce their risk. No data were available on the attitude and the extent to which European GPs have incorporated selective CMD prevention into daily practice. Methods: A survey among 575 GPs from the Czech Republic, Denmark, Greece, the Netherlands and Sweden was conducted between September 2016 and January 2017, within the framework of the SPIMEU-project. Results: On average, 71% of GPs invited their patients to attend for CMD risk assessment. Some used an active approach (47%) while others used an opportunistic approach (53%), but these values differed between countries. Most GPs considered selective CMD prevention as useful (82%) and saw it as part of their normal duties (84%). GPs who did find selective prevention useful were more likely to actively invite individuals compared with their counterparts who did not find prevention useful. Most GPs had a disease management programme for individuals with risk factor(s) for cardiovascular disease (71%) or diabetes (86%). Conclusions: Although most GPs considered selective CMD prevention as useful, it was not universally implemented. The biggest challenge was the process of inviting individuals for risk assessment. It is important to tailor the implementation of selective CMD prevention in primary care to the national context, involving stakeholders at different levels.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035122
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191011105957.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2019 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/eurpub/cky112 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30016426
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a de Waard, Anne-Karien M $u Department of General Practice, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
245    10
$a Selective prevention of cardiometabolic diseases: activities and attitudes of general practitioners across Europe / $c AM. de Waard, M. Hollander, JC. Korevaar, MMJ. Nielen, AC. Carlsson, C. Lionis, B. Seifert, T. Thilsing, NJ. de Wit, FG. Schellevis, SPIMEU Project Group,
520    9_
$a Background: Cardiometabolic diseases (CMDs) are the number one cause of death. Selective prevention of CMDs by general practitioners (GPs) could help reduce the burden of CMDs. This measure would entail the identification of individuals at high risk of CMDs-but currently asymptomatic-followed by interventions to reduce their risk. No data were available on the attitude and the extent to which European GPs have incorporated selective CMD prevention into daily practice. Methods: A survey among 575 GPs from the Czech Republic, Denmark, Greece, the Netherlands and Sweden was conducted between September 2016 and January 2017, within the framework of the SPIMEU-project. Results: On average, 71% of GPs invited their patients to attend for CMD risk assessment. Some used an active approach (47%) while others used an opportunistic approach (53%), but these values differed between countries. Most GPs considered selective CMD prevention as useful (82%) and saw it as part of their normal duties (84%). GPs who did find selective prevention useful were more likely to actively invite individuals compared with their counterparts who did not find prevention useful. Most GPs had a disease management programme for individuals with risk factor(s) for cardiovascular disease (71%) or diabetes (86%). Conclusions: Although most GPs considered selective CMD prevention as useful, it was not universally implemented. The biggest challenge was the process of inviting individuals for risk assessment. It is important to tailor the implementation of selective CMD prevention in primary care to the national context, involving stakeholders at different levels.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a postoj zdravotnického personálu $7 D001291
650    _2
$a kardiovaskulární nemoci $x epidemiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D002318
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a praktičtí lékaři $x psychologie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D058005
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010818
650    _2
$a primární zdravotní péče $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011320
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
651    _2
$a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Dánsko $x epidemiologie $7 D003718
651    _2
$a Řecko $x epidemiologie $7 D006115
651    _2
$a Nizozemsko $x epidemiologie $7 D009426
651    _2
$a Švédsko $x epidemiologie $7 D013548
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hollander, Monika $u Department of General Practice, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Korevaar, Joke C $u Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Nielen, Mark M J $u Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Carlsson, Axel C $u Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Lionis, Christos $u Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Greece.
700    1_
$a Seifert, Bohumil $u Institute of General Practice, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, The Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Thilsing, Trine $u Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark.
700    1_
$a de Wit, Niek J $u Department of General Practice, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Schellevis, François G $u Nivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands. Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
710    2_
$a SPIMEU Project Group
773    0_
$w MED00012099 $t European journal of public health $x 1464-360X $g Roč. 29, č. 1 (2019), s. 88-93
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30016426 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191011110417 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451782 $s 1073672
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 29 $c 1 $d 88-93 $e 20190201 $i 1464-360X $m European journal of public health $n Eur J Public Health $x MED00012099
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace