Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated microbial communities from dry grassland do not improve plant growth on abandoned field soil

H. Pánková, C. Lepinay, J. Rydlová, A. Voříšková, M. Janoušková, T. Dostálek, Z. Münzbergová,

. 2018 ; 186 (3) : 677-689. [pub] 20180110

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19035448

Grantová podpora
grant 15-11635S Czech Science Foundation - International

After abandonment of agricultural fields, some grassland plant species colonize these sites with a frequency equivalent to dry grasslands (generalists) while others are missing or underrepresented in abandoned fields (specialists). We aimed to understand the inability of specialists to spread on abandoned fields by exploring whether performance of generalists and specialists depended on soil abiotic and/or biotic legacy. We performed a greenhouse experiment with 12 species, six specialists and six generalists. The plants were grown in sterile soil from dry grassland or abandoned field inoculated with microbial communities from one or the other site. Plant growth, abundance of mycorrhizal structures and plant response to inoculation were evaluated. We focused on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), one of the most important parts of soil communities affecting plant performance. The abandoned field soil negatively affected plant growth, but positively affected plant response to inoculation. The AMF community from both sites differed in infectivity and taxa frequencies. The lower AMF taxa frequency in the dry grassland soil suggested a lack of functional complementarity. Despite the fact that dry grassland AMF produced more arbuscules, the dry grassland inoculum did not improve phosphorus nutrition of specialists contrary to the abandoned field inoculum. Inoculum origin did not affect phosphorus nutrition of generalists. The lower effectiveness of the dry grassland microbial community toward plant performance excludes its inoculation in the abandoned field soil as a solution to allow settlement of specialists. Still, the distinct response of specialists and generalists to inoculation suggested that they differ in AMF responsiveness.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035448
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191008113741.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00442-017-4054-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29322323
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Pánková, Hana $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated microbial communities from dry grassland do not improve plant growth on abandoned field soil / $c H. Pánková, C. Lepinay, J. Rydlová, A. Voříšková, M. Janoušková, T. Dostálek, Z. Münzbergová,
520    9_
$a After abandonment of agricultural fields, some grassland plant species colonize these sites with a frequency equivalent to dry grasslands (generalists) while others are missing or underrepresented in abandoned fields (specialists). We aimed to understand the inability of specialists to spread on abandoned fields by exploring whether performance of generalists and specialists depended on soil abiotic and/or biotic legacy. We performed a greenhouse experiment with 12 species, six specialists and six generalists. The plants were grown in sterile soil from dry grassland or abandoned field inoculated with microbial communities from one or the other site. Plant growth, abundance of mycorrhizal structures and plant response to inoculation were evaluated. We focused on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), one of the most important parts of soil communities affecting plant performance. The abandoned field soil negatively affected plant growth, but positively affected plant response to inoculation. The AMF community from both sites differed in infectivity and taxa frequencies. The lower AMF taxa frequency in the dry grassland soil suggested a lack of functional complementarity. Despite the fact that dry grassland AMF produced more arbuscules, the dry grassland inoculum did not improve phosphorus nutrition of specialists contrary to the abandoned field inoculum. Inoculum origin did not affect phosphorus nutrition of generalists. The lower effectiveness of the dry grassland microbial community toward plant performance excludes its inoculation in the abandoned field soil as a solution to allow settlement of specialists. Still, the distinct response of specialists and generalists to inoculation suggested that they differ in AMF responsiveness.
650    _2
$a houby $7 D005658
650    _2
$a pastviny $7 D065948
650    12
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    12
$a mykorhiza $7 D038821
650    _2
$a vývoj rostlin $7 D063245
650    _2
$a kořeny rostlin $7 D018517
650    _2
$a půda $7 D012987
650    _2
$a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Lepinay, Clémentine $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. clementine.lepinay@gmail.com.
700    1_
$a Rydlová, Jana $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Voříšková, Alena $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Janoušková, Martina $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Dostálek, Tomáš $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Münzbergová, Zuzana $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00005783 $t Oecologia $x 1432-1939 $g Roč. 186, č. 3 (2018), s. 677-689
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29322323 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191008114157 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1452108 $s 1073998
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 186 $c 3 $d 677-689 $e 20180110 $i 1432-1939 $m Oecologia $n Oecologia $x MED00005783
GRA    __
$a grant 15-11635S $p Czech Science Foundation $2 International
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...