-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated microbial communities from dry grassland do not improve plant growth on abandoned field soil
H. Pánková, C. Lepinay, J. Rydlová, A. Voříšková, M. Janoušková, T. Dostálek, Z. Münzbergová,
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
grant 15-11635S
Czech Science Foundation - International
- MeSH
- houby MeSH
- kořeny rostlin MeSH
- mikrobiota * MeSH
- mykorhiza * MeSH
- pastviny MeSH
- půda MeSH
- půdní mikrobiologie MeSH
- vývoj rostlin MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
After abandonment of agricultural fields, some grassland plant species colonize these sites with a frequency equivalent to dry grasslands (generalists) while others are missing or underrepresented in abandoned fields (specialists). We aimed to understand the inability of specialists to spread on abandoned fields by exploring whether performance of generalists and specialists depended on soil abiotic and/or biotic legacy. We performed a greenhouse experiment with 12 species, six specialists and six generalists. The plants were grown in sterile soil from dry grassland or abandoned field inoculated with microbial communities from one or the other site. Plant growth, abundance of mycorrhizal structures and plant response to inoculation were evaluated. We focused on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), one of the most important parts of soil communities affecting plant performance. The abandoned field soil negatively affected plant growth, but positively affected plant response to inoculation. The AMF community from both sites differed in infectivity and taxa frequencies. The lower AMF taxa frequency in the dry grassland soil suggested a lack of functional complementarity. Despite the fact that dry grassland AMF produced more arbuscules, the dry grassland inoculum did not improve phosphorus nutrition of specialists contrary to the abandoned field inoculum. Inoculum origin did not affect phosphorus nutrition of generalists. The lower effectiveness of the dry grassland microbial community toward plant performance excludes its inoculation in the abandoned field soil as a solution to allow settlement of specialists. Still, the distinct response of specialists and generalists to inoculation suggested that they differ in AMF responsiveness.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19035448
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191008113741.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00442-017-4054-6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29322323
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Pánková, Hana $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated microbial communities from dry grassland do not improve plant growth on abandoned field soil / $c H. Pánková, C. Lepinay, J. Rydlová, A. Voříšková, M. Janoušková, T. Dostálek, Z. Münzbergová,
- 520 9_
- $a After abandonment of agricultural fields, some grassland plant species colonize these sites with a frequency equivalent to dry grasslands (generalists) while others are missing or underrepresented in abandoned fields (specialists). We aimed to understand the inability of specialists to spread on abandoned fields by exploring whether performance of generalists and specialists depended on soil abiotic and/or biotic legacy. We performed a greenhouse experiment with 12 species, six specialists and six generalists. The plants were grown in sterile soil from dry grassland or abandoned field inoculated with microbial communities from one or the other site. Plant growth, abundance of mycorrhizal structures and plant response to inoculation were evaluated. We focused on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), one of the most important parts of soil communities affecting plant performance. The abandoned field soil negatively affected plant growth, but positively affected plant response to inoculation. The AMF community from both sites differed in infectivity and taxa frequencies. The lower AMF taxa frequency in the dry grassland soil suggested a lack of functional complementarity. Despite the fact that dry grassland AMF produced more arbuscules, the dry grassland inoculum did not improve phosphorus nutrition of specialists contrary to the abandoned field inoculum. Inoculum origin did not affect phosphorus nutrition of generalists. The lower effectiveness of the dry grassland microbial community toward plant performance excludes its inoculation in the abandoned field soil as a solution to allow settlement of specialists. Still, the distinct response of specialists and generalists to inoculation suggested that they differ in AMF responsiveness.
- 650 _2
- $a houby $7 D005658
- 650 _2
- $a pastviny $7 D065948
- 650 12
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 12
- $a mykorhiza $7 D038821
- 650 _2
- $a vývoj rostlin $7 D063245
- 650 _2
- $a kořeny rostlin $7 D018517
- 650 _2
- $a půda $7 D012987
- 650 _2
- $a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Lepinay, Clémentine $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. clementine.lepinay@gmail.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Rydlová, Jana $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Voříšková, Alena $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 5, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Janoušková, Martina $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dostálek, Tomáš $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Münzbergová, Zuzana $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00005783 $t Oecologia $x 1432-1939 $g Roč. 186, č. 3 (2018), s. 677-689
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29322323 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191008114157 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1452108 $s 1073998
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 186 $c 3 $d 677-689 $e 20180110 $i 1432-1939 $m Oecologia $n Oecologia $x MED00005783
- GRA __
- $a grant 15-11635S $p Czech Science Foundation $2 International
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007