Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Je intraartikulární podávání antibiotik efektivní v léčbě infekce způsobené methicillin-rezistentním stafylokokem? [Is intraarticular antibiotic administration effective in the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus?]

E. Kuyucu, H. Çabuk, Y. Güler, F. Çabuk, E. Kiliç, M. Bülbül

. 2019 ; 86 (4) : 276-280. [pub] -

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Evaluation Study, Journal Article

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Septic arthritis is an infection of joints caused by a pathogenic microorganism. Septic arthritis has a mortality rate of 11-40% when it's not treated properly. The mortality rate with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)is 5-7%, while the rate with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)is 13-20%. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of intraarticular vancomycin and teicoplanin on joint cartilage in in vivo settings and its utility in routine MRSA treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS In our study, 35 male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 28 days were used. Rats were obtained from the Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center (REMER) of Istanbul Medipol University. Rats were randomly divided into 5 groups each containing 7 rats. Joint injections were administered with isoflurane analgesia every day at 6 am. Three rats (15 rats) from each group were sacrified in seventh day and evaluated immunohistologically to evaluate acute healing in articular cartilage. All remaining rats were sacrificed on day 28 and their knees were evaluated by immunohistochemical examination. RESULTS In our study, there were no complications in any rat during injection and the study period. Hematoxylin eosin (H & E) histological staining for evaluating cartilage healing and healing levels did not show statistically significant differences between the groups at first week (p > 0.05). Matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13) staining did not show any statistically significant difference between the groups. (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION MRSAseptic arthritis, diagnosed for the first time in 1960, has recently been responsible for 6-22% of all septic arthritis and is increasing day by day. The use of systemic vancomycin or teicoplanin is the first-line treatment method in MRSA septic arthritis. Serum levels reach the desired level, especially with intravenous infusion dose. On the other hand, it has been shown that intraarticular concentration does not reach a sufficient level in studies conducted. The use of intraarticular antibiotics during treatment can lead to more effective and early disease control by turning this negative situation into favor of the patient. As a result, intraarticular vancomycin and teicoplanin maximale tolerable and maintenance doses can be safely used beside surgery and intravenous antibiotics to increase efficacy of treatment, reduction of recurrence rates and reduction of mortality in MRSAseptic arthritis. CONCLUSIONS Intraarticular vancomycin and teicoplanin maximale tolerable and maintenance doses can be safely used beside surgery and intravenous antibiotics to increase efficacy of treatment, reduction of recurrence rates and reduction of mortality in MRSA septic arthritis. Key words:arthritis, infectious; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; mortality.

Is intraarticular antibiotic administration effective in the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus?

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19042086
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191212100933.0
007      
ta
008      
191205s2019 xr f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2019/046
035    __
$a (PubMed)31524589
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Kuyucu, E. $u Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
245    10
$a Je intraartikulární podávání antibiotik efektivní v léčbě infekce způsobené methicillin-rezistentním stafylokokem? / $c E. Kuyucu, H. Çabuk, Y. Güler, F. Çabuk, E. Kiliç, M. Bülbül
246    31
$a Is intraarticular antibiotic administration effective in the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus?
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Septic arthritis is an infection of joints caused by a pathogenic microorganism. Septic arthritis has a mortality rate of 11-40% when it's not treated properly. The mortality rate with methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)is 5-7%, while the rate with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)is 13-20%. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of intraarticular vancomycin and teicoplanin on joint cartilage in in vivo settings and its utility in routine MRSA treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS In our study, 35 male Sprague-Dawley rats aged 28 days were used. Rats were obtained from the Regenerative and Restorative Medicine Research Center (REMER) of Istanbul Medipol University. Rats were randomly divided into 5 groups each containing 7 rats. Joint injections were administered with isoflurane analgesia every day at 6 am. Three rats (15 rats) from each group were sacrified in seventh day and evaluated immunohistologically to evaluate acute healing in articular cartilage. All remaining rats were sacrificed on day 28 and their knees were evaluated by immunohistochemical examination. RESULTS In our study, there were no complications in any rat during injection and the study period. Hematoxylin eosin (H & E) histological staining for evaluating cartilage healing and healing levels did not show statistically significant differences between the groups at first week (p > 0.05). Matrix metalloproteinase-13 (MMP-13) staining did not show any statistically significant difference between the groups. (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION MRSAseptic arthritis, diagnosed for the first time in 1960, has recently been responsible for 6-22% of all septic arthritis and is increasing day by day. The use of systemic vancomycin or teicoplanin is the first-line treatment method in MRSA septic arthritis. Serum levels reach the desired level, especially with intravenous infusion dose. On the other hand, it has been shown that intraarticular concentration does not reach a sufficient level in studies conducted. The use of intraarticular antibiotics during treatment can lead to more effective and early disease control by turning this negative situation into favor of the patient. As a result, intraarticular vancomycin and teicoplanin maximale tolerable and maintenance doses can be safely used beside surgery and intravenous antibiotics to increase efficacy of treatment, reduction of recurrence rates and reduction of mortality in MRSAseptic arthritis. CONCLUSIONS Intraarticular vancomycin and teicoplanin maximale tolerable and maintenance doses can be safely used beside surgery and intravenous antibiotics to increase efficacy of treatment, reduction of recurrence rates and reduction of mortality in MRSA septic arthritis. Key words:arthritis, infectious; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; mortality.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a antibakteriální látky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000900
650    _2
$a infekční artritida $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D001170
650    _2
$a kloubní chrupavka $x účinky léků $x patologie $7 D002358
650    _2
$a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
650    _2
$a zadní končetina $x účinky léků $x mikrobiologie $7 D006614
650    _2
$a injekce intraartikulární $7 D007270
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a methicilin rezistentní Staphylococcus aureus $x izolace a purifikace $7 D055624
650    _2
$a náhodné rozdělení $7 D011897
650    _2
$a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
650    _2
$a potkani Sprague-Dawley $7 D017207
650    _2
$a stafylokokové infekce $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D013203
650    _2
$a teikoplanin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D017334
650    _2
$a vankomycin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D014640
650    _2
$a hojení ran $x účinky léků $7 D014945
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Çabuk, H. $u Istanbul Okmeydani Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Güler, Y. $u Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Çabuk, F. $u Bakirkóy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Pathology Clinic, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Kiliç, E. $u Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
700    1_
$a Bülbül, M. $u Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 86, č. 4 (2019), s. 276-280
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20191205 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191210101255 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1473203 $s 1080728
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 86 $c 4 $d 276-280 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20191205

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...