BACKGROUND: Before arterial cannulation for invasive blood pressure monitoring, clinical decision-making depends on non-invasive blood pressure in critically ill patients. Whether non-invasive blood pressure is comparable to invasive measurement is not clearly elucidated. We address this issue as it relates to the use of norepinephrine in patients with cardiogenic shock. METHODS: We analysed invasive and non-invasive blood pressure in 85 patients admitted to the Coronary-Care Unit for cardiogenic shock. We compared initial blood pressure measurement (just after radial artery cannulation) and blood pressure taken during the first 72 hours after admission. Invasive blood pressure was used as the reference method. RESULTS: Initial invasive mean and systolic arterial pressures were in a good agreement with oscillometric blood pressure; mean differences were -0.4 ± 8.8 and +6.1 ± 14.4 mmHg with correlation coefficients of 0.76 and 0.74. Doses of norepinephrine were significant negative determinants of invasive/oscillometric blood pressure differences. The invasive/oscillometric mean arterial pressures and SBP differences were +0.1 ± 3.4 and 7.6 ± 1.6 mmHg in patients treated with nothing or a maximum norepinephrine dose of 0.6 µg/kg/min. However, treatment with very high doses of norepinephrine was associated with a steep rise in mean arterial pressures and SBP invasive/oscillometric differences (-9.5 ± 3.3 and -8.5 ± 5.2 mmHg). In a total of 967 sets of blood pressure measurements, invasive/oscillometric differences were relatively stable across blood pressure categories, with the exception of measurements assessed after very high norepinephrine doses. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive BP is a sufficient substitute for invasive measurement in cardiogenic shock patients, with the exception of those receiving very high doses of norepinephrine.

Cardiology Department University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and Faculty Hospital Charles University

Internal Department 2 University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University Pilsen Czech Republic

000      

00000naa a2200000 a 4500

001      

bmc19044545

003      

CZ-PrNML

005      

20200113101127.0

007      

ta

008      

200109s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||

009      

AR

024    7_

$a 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000393 $2 doi

035    __

$a (PubMed)31490245

040    __

$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2

041    0_

$a eng

044    __

$a xxk

100    1_

$a Hromádka, Milan $u Cardiology Department, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and Faculty Hospital, Charles University.

245    10

$a Blood pressure measurement in patients with cardiogenic shock: the effect of norepinephrine / $c M. Hromádka, P. Tůmová, R. Rokyta, J. Seidlerová,

520    9_

$a BACKGROUND: Before arterial cannulation for invasive blood pressure monitoring, clinical decision-making depends on non-invasive blood pressure in critically ill patients. Whether non-invasive blood pressure is comparable to invasive measurement is not clearly elucidated. We address this issue as it relates to the use of norepinephrine in patients with cardiogenic shock. METHODS: We analysed invasive and non-invasive blood pressure in 85 patients admitted to the Coronary-Care Unit for cardiogenic shock. We compared initial blood pressure measurement (just after radial artery cannulation) and blood pressure taken during the first 72 hours after admission. Invasive blood pressure was used as the reference method. RESULTS: Initial invasive mean and systolic arterial pressures were in a good agreement with oscillometric blood pressure; mean differences were -0.4 ± 8.8 and +6.1 ± 14.4 mmHg with correlation coefficients of 0.76 and 0.74. Doses of norepinephrine were significant negative determinants of invasive/oscillometric blood pressure differences. The invasive/oscillometric mean arterial pressures and SBP differences were +0.1 ± 3.4 and 7.6 ± 1.6 mmHg in patients treated with nothing or a maximum norepinephrine dose of 0.6 µg/kg/min. However, treatment with very high doses of norepinephrine was associated with a steep rise in mean arterial pressures and SBP invasive/oscillometric differences (-9.5 ± 3.3 and -8.5 ± 5.2 mmHg). In a total of 967 sets of blood pressure measurements, invasive/oscillometric differences were relatively stable across blood pressure categories, with the exception of measurements assessed after very high norepinephrine doses. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive BP is a sufficient substitute for invasive measurement in cardiogenic shock patients, with the exception of those receiving very high doses of norepinephrine.

650    _2

$a senioři $7 D000368

650    _2

$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369

650    _2

$a arteriální tlak $7 D062186

650    _2

$a krevní tlak $x účinky léků $7 D001794

650    _2

$a měření krevního tlaku $x metody $7 D001795

650    _2

$a katetrizace $7 D002404

650    _2

$a kritický stav $7 D016638

650    _2

$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260

650    _2

$a lidé $7 D006801

650    _2

$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297

650    _2

$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875

650    _2

$a monitorování fyziologických funkcí $7 D008991

650    _2

$a noradrenalin $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D009638

650    _2

$a oscilometrie $x metody $7 D009991

650    _2

$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446

650    _2

$a kardiogenní šok $x patofyziologie $7 D012770

650    _2

$a vazokonstriktory $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D014662

655    _2

$a časopisecké články $7 D016428

655    _2

$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888

700    1_

$a Tůmová, Pavlína $u Cardiology Department, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and Faculty Hospital, Charles University.

700    1_

$a Rokyta, Richard $u Cardiology Department, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and Faculty Hospital, Charles University.

700    1_

$a Seidlerová, Jitka $u Internal Department II, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University. Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.

773    0_

$w MED00000811 $t Blood pressure monitoring $x 1473-5725 $g Roč. 24, č. 5 (2019), s. 213-220

856    41

$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31490245 $y Pubmed

910    __

$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0

990    __

$a 20200109 $b ABA008

991    __

$a 20200113101459 $b ABA008

999    __

$a ok $b bmc $g 1482814 $s 1083218

BAS    __

$a 3

BAS    __

$a PreBMC

BMC    __

$a 2019 $b 24 $c 5 $d 213-220 $e - $i 1473-5725 $m Blood pressure monitoring $n Blood Press Monit $x MED00000811

LZP    __

$a Pubmed-20200109