• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Patient Satisfaction with General versus Local Anesthesia during Carotid Endarterectomy

J. Mracek, J. Kletecka, I. Holeckova, J. Dostal, J. Mrackova, J. Mork, V. Priban,

. 2019 ; 80 (5) : 341-344. [pub] 20190429

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19044854

Grantová podpora
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization 0066980

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Both general and local anesthesia are used in our department for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The decision as to which anesthetic technique to use during surgery is made individually. The aim of our study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and preference with the anesthesia type used. MATERIAL AND METHODS:  The satisfaction of a group of 205 patients with regard to anesthesia used and their future preferences were evaluated prospectively through a questionnaire. The reasons for dissatisfaction were assessed. RESULTS:  CEA was performed under general anesthesia (GA) in 159 cases (77.6%) and under local anesthesia (LA) in 46 cases (22.4%). In the GA group, 148 patients (93.1%) were satisfied; 30 patients (65.2%) in the LA group were satisfied (p < 0.0001). The reason for dissatisfaction with GA were postoperative nausea and vomiting (7 patients), postoperative psychological alteration (3), and fear of GA (1). The reasons for dissatisfaction with LA were intraoperative pain (9 patients), intraoperative discomfort and stress (5), and intraoperative breathing problems (2). Of the GA group, 154 (96.9%) patients would prefer GA again, and of the LA group, 28 (60.9%) patients would prefer LA if operated on again (p < 0.0001). Overall, 172 patients (83.9%) would prefer GA in the future, and 33 patients (16.1%) would prefer LA. CONCLUSION:  Overall patient satisfaction with CEA performed under both GA and LA is high. Nevertheless, in the GA group, patient satisfaction and future preference were significantly higher. Both GA and LA have advantages and disadvantages for CEA. An optimal approach is to make use of both anesthetic techniques based on their individual indications and patient preference.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19044854
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200115091142.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1055/s-0039-1688692 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31035296
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Mracek, Jan $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, University Hospital Pilsen - Pilsen, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Patient Satisfaction with General versus Local Anesthesia during Carotid Endarterectomy / $c J. Mracek, J. Kletecka, I. Holeckova, J. Dostal, J. Mrackova, J. Mork, V. Priban,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS:  Both general and local anesthesia are used in our department for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The decision as to which anesthetic technique to use during surgery is made individually. The aim of our study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and preference with the anesthesia type used. MATERIAL AND METHODS:  The satisfaction of a group of 205 patients with regard to anesthesia used and their future preferences were evaluated prospectively through a questionnaire. The reasons for dissatisfaction were assessed. RESULTS:  CEA was performed under general anesthesia (GA) in 159 cases (77.6%) and under local anesthesia (LA) in 46 cases (22.4%). In the GA group, 148 patients (93.1%) were satisfied; 30 patients (65.2%) in the LA group were satisfied (p < 0.0001). The reason for dissatisfaction with GA were postoperative nausea and vomiting (7 patients), postoperative psychological alteration (3), and fear of GA (1). The reasons for dissatisfaction with LA were intraoperative pain (9 patients), intraoperative discomfort and stress (5), and intraoperative breathing problems (2). Of the GA group, 154 (96.9%) patients would prefer GA again, and of the LA group, 28 (60.9%) patients would prefer LA if operated on again (p < 0.0001). Overall, 172 patients (83.9%) would prefer GA in the future, and 33 patients (16.1%) would prefer LA. CONCLUSION:  Overall patient satisfaction with CEA performed under both GA and LA is high. Nevertheless, in the GA group, patient satisfaction and future preference were significantly higher. Both GA and LA have advantages and disadvantages for CEA. An optimal approach is to make use of both anesthetic techniques based on their individual indications and patient preference.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a celková anestezie $7 D000768
650    12
$a lokální anestezie $7 D000772
650    _2
$a karotická endarterektomie $x metody $7 D016894
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
650    _2
$a pooperační období $7 D011184
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kletecka, Jakub $u Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, University Hospital Pilsen - Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Holeckova, Irena $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, University Hospital Pilsen - Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Dostal, Jiri $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, University Hospital Pilsen - Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mrackova, Jolana $u Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, University Hospital Pilsen - Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mork, Jan $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, University Hospital Pilsen - Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Priban, Vladimir $u Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, University Hospital Pilsen - Pilsen, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00179151 $t Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery $x 2193-6323 $g Roč. 80, č. 5 (2019), s. 341-344
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31035296 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200115091516 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483123 $s 1083527
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 80 $c 5 $d 341-344 $e 20190429 $i 2193-6323 $m Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery $n J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg $x MED00179151
GRA    __
$a Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization $p 0066980
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace